Oh? So Rafa has beaten Roger 6 times on non clay surfaces whilst Roger has only beaten him twice on clay ? Interesting.
So what? Rafa is dominant on clay like nobody else including Federer ever was, on any surface. And still, this turkey-like H2H doesn't really show what this match-up is about. Please don't bring statistics into this argument, because you are just embarrassing yourself: Nadal did reach almost every final in the last two years, but what about 2004-2008? He dominated on clay since 2005 and reached Wimby finals, but unlike Fed who was always a close second even on his worst surface
, Nadal was nowhere to be found on HC. There is no reason to claim that Nadal is as solid on fast surfaces as Federer is on clay. They play 3 clay events a year together, and at least 10 off clay, yet 14 of their 28 meetings were on clay.
BOOM, the fedtards get burnt whenever this issue pops up
Fuck off Murray fan.