Golden era of tennis - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-11-2012, 10:43 PM Thread Starter
The new era of SuperNovak
 
Nole fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,624
                     
Golden era of tennis

28 of 29 is proof of tennis' golden era


UPDATED JUN 11, 2012 4:22 PM ET

PARIS (AP)
While a bank of photographers took pictures for posterity and the front pages of the world, Rafael Nadal lovingly studied the champions' names - the likes of Bjorn Borg, Roger Federer and, of course, his own - engraved on the base of the French Open trophy. A huge grin dawned on his face like sunrise. He looked like the happiest person on the planet.

And yet, minutes later, down in the bowels of the Roland Garros arena where Nadal had just made history, his uncle and coach was talking not about the brilliance of the best clay-court player men's tennis has ever seen, but about his rotten luck. The point Toni Nadal was making was that his nephew's career could have been even more stellar if he had been playing in another era - one without Federer and now, increasingly, Novak Djokovic - his defeated opponent in this French Open final.

''Unlucky, unlucky, oh yes,'' uncle Toni said. ''If there wasn't Federer, perhaps Rafael would have been No. 1 for four years. But with Federer, that was impossible.''

He is right, of course. But wrong, too.

Nadal would almost certainly have more major titles by now - this record seventh French Open crown took his total to 11 - if not for Federer and Djokovic. Without those two stones in his shoes, Nadal could have ruled alone at the top of tennis for years.

But would tennis fans have cared as much about the men's game as they do now? No. And would Nadal have become such a good player if first Federer and now Djokovic hadn't forced him to improve? Probably not.

''To just watch these top players push each other, I don't think there's any much further to push,'' Steffi Graf, a 22-time major winner on the women's side, said before this latest momentous chapter in the Djokovic-Nadal-Federer rivalry. ''Men's tennis, definitely, is at the highest it has even been.''

Like musketeers, they're even more glorious as a trio. By building this golden era of tennis together, they share in its glitter. It may sometimes seem like a curse for Toni Nadal, but it is precisely because his nephew is tested so often against opponents of such high quality that we can be absolutely sure of his and their greatness.

To beat each other, they have to lift their game to the highest of standards. All three have been made bigger and stronger by their rivalry, not diminished by it. They are each other's poison, but also each other's magic potion that makes them look good. Together, they have now won 28 of the last 29 majors. So, in men's tennis, it is them on one plane, everyone else on another, and looks likely to stay that way for the immediate future, at least for Nadal and Djokovic. Both in their mid-twenties, they have more time than Federer, 30, to make even more of a mark.

''They are doing something to one another that hasn't been done before,'' said three-time French Open champion Mats Wilander. ''Borg made (John) McEnroe a better player, but Borg quit. And Federer made Nadal a better player, and Federer didn't quit. And Djokovic has beaten the hell out of Nadal, and Nadal didn't quit. So I think they're a very special three players that are not afraid of one another. They're not mentally really disturbed by one another. They just tactically, technically can't handle the other guy. It's very interesting.''

Had he won his first French Open final, Djokovic would have become the first player since Rod Laver in 1969 to hold four majors at the same time.

But Nadal, for his mental health, needed this victory more. Another loss in a major final to the world's No. 1 would have been the fourth in a row for Nadal, an unprecedented Grand Slam of losses that would done untold damage to the Spaniard's confidence.

So he came to this match talking as though he had swallowed a library of self-help motivational books - ''I will be there fighting,'' ''I can't let him feel comfortable,'' ''I have to play aggressive, I have to play my game'' - and executed his plan for the first two sets until rain Sunday made the balls play like grapefruits and take the sting off Nadal's shots.

If looks could kill, there's a patch of red clay on the Philippe Chatrier showcourt at Roland Garros that would need last rites. That was where Djokovic's backhand service return landed on the very first point of the fourth set, with the tide turning Djokovic's way after he won the third. Nadal swung his racket, missed the ball entirely and, convinced he'd had a bad bounce from the increasingly sodden clay, stared furiously at the offending spot. That captured how the wet messed with Nadal's mind and his tennis.

Nadal can count himself lucky that the referee intervened two games later, sending them home until Monday. But he doesn't owe his eventual 6-4, 6-3, 2-6, 7-5 victory to luck. He won as he often does, by soaking up pretty much everything thrown at him and returning it with interest and lashes of topspin.

Nadal is so at home at Roland Garros that the ballkids know, seemingly without being told, to lay out a towel on the red clay next to his bench so his white equipment bag doesn't get dirty. Beating him was always going to require Djokovic's very best tennis, and he only delivered that in patches. To breach Nadal's defenses, Djokovic was forced to aim for the sidelines. Often, the risk didn't pay off. But he did have some success with serve and volley and a few elegant lobs over Nadal's head - variety that may help him unlock the riddle of beating Nadal on his best surface next time.

''How much is he going to improve on clay? So much,'' said Wilander. ''After today, he's going to figure, 'OK, I could have won that match if I do this and this, and I work on my forehand and maybe come in a little more, maybe more surprise serve and volley. Three or four points makes a big difference.' He's right there. They better watch out for him on clay next year, because he'll be heading in the other direction, I think. I really do.''

What a prospect. For many, Federer is the greatest player in tennis history. His record 16 major titles give his fans a gilt-edged argument. Without Nadal, Federer would have had more. Without Federer, so might Nadal. And, without them, Djokovic would not have been forced to hone himself into the force he has become - formidable enough to still be ranked No. 1 despite this defeat.

A golden era, indeed.

''I have great rivals,'' Nadal said. ''For me, you can feel unlucky or lucky. Both.''



Novak Djokovic nº1!

The Golden Era of Novak: Australian Open * Dubai * Indian Wells * Miami * Belgrade * Madrid * Rome * Wimbledon * Montreal * US Open * Abu Dhabi * Australian Open * Miami * Toronto * China * Shanghai * World Tour Finals 2012 * Australian Open 2013 * Dubai * Montecarlo * Beijing * Shanghai * Paris * WTF * Indian Wells * Miami * Rome * WIMBLEDON 2014 * AUSSIE OPEN 2015
Federer to Nole: "Amazing year. Amazing tournament. Amazing match. You are THE BEST!"
Nole fan is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-11-2012, 10:49 PM
Registered User
 
Looner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13,127
                     
Re: Golden era of tennis

Complete BS.


The "Who plays tennis?" thread


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket Rod Laver
Roger is like a good red wine, he’s getting better with age.
Looner is offline  
post #3 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-12-2012, 12:14 AM
Registered User
 
ossie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Age: 30
Posts: 6,377
                     
Re: Golden era of tennis

this is indeed the strongest era in mens tennis. the tards on this board are the only ones who dont agree.
ossie is offline  
post #4 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-12-2012, 12:17 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Age: 39
Posts: 1,360
                     
Re: Golden era of tennis

Quote:
Originally Posted by ossie View Post
this is indeed the strongest era in mens tennis. the tards on this board are the only ones who dont agree.
I't must be with GOAT like Delpo
Jamoz is offline  
post #5 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-12-2012, 12:18 AM
Registered User
 
finishingmove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Age: 27
Posts: 22,757
                     
Re: Golden era of tennis

Good article.

And as long as they all remain on the tour they will keep forcing each other to improve.
finishingmove is offline  
post #6 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-12-2012, 12:28 AM
Registered User
 
Mark Lenders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 16,647
                     
Re: Golden era of tennis

Whether this is a golden era of tennis or not, the fact that 28 of the past 29 Slams were won by only three players proves absolutely nothing.

Tennis is about more than three players and taken in isolation it could also mean that the rest of the field isn't up to mark, which does not constitute a golden era.
Mark Lenders is offline  
post #7 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-12-2012, 12:28 AM
Blown Out On the Trail
 
star's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 62,738
                     
Re: Golden era of tennis

Thanks, Nole Fan. That was an interesting article.
star is offline  
post #8 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-12-2012, 12:29 AM
Registered User
 
TBkeeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Age: 20
Posts: 4,291
                     
Re: Golden era of tennis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Lenders View Post
Whether this is a golden era of tennis or not, the fact that 28 of the past 29 Slams were won by only three players proves absolutely nothing.

Tennis is about more than three players and taken in isolation it could also mean that the rest of the field isn't up to mark, which does not constitute a golden era.
T H I S
TBkeeper is offline  
post #9 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-12-2012, 12:31 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,506
                     
Re: Golden era of tennis

I almost think it would be a good idea if the "era" arguments were permanently banned from MTF because they are just so boring now. Soon we will have SetSampras on to say that the 1990s were the only true golden era (yes, the 1990s, the era when Rusedski almost got to no 1).
Fed=ATPTourkilla is offline  
post #10 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-12-2012, 12:36 AM
Registered User
 
tektonac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,066
                     
Re: Golden era of tennis

toni having a crush on federer or just psyching him for SW19

ASI Director-General Gautam Sengupta said the list of India's treasures held abroad was "too long to handle" and there was a need for a "diplomatic and legal campaign" for their restitution from institutions, including the British Museum, the Royal Collection and the Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery.
tektonac is offline  
post #11 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-12-2012, 12:38 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 24,266
                     
Re: Golden era of tennis

Golden era of tennis like the golden era of baseball. lol. What a fucking joke. I am sick and tired of people shitting their pants and not talking about the big elephant in the room

SheepleBuster: Nikola Tesla of MTF ...Jesus of America - the Capitalist Crusader.. the Morning Star ... the Bringer of Light.

My Black List: InfiDULL, Gutless Federer

Suarez & Nadal : True Trailblazers in Sports
*Proud hater of the neo-L.Ron Hubbard of Espana, the fake Pharaoh without clothes ... cult leader extraordinaire and ...

Fact: George Washington did not lose to Nole in Wimbledon final
SheepleBuster is offline  
post #12 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-12-2012, 12:40 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10,825
                     
Re: Golden era of tennis

The #1 is a cheater and a faker, the #2 has gamesmanship issue. Not that golden...
BigJohn is offline  
post #13 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-12-2012, 12:43 AM
Registered User
 
LaFuria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,999
                     
Re: Golden era of tennis

The golden era of mugginess perhaps. When you only have 2 guys who can win slams, both of whom can barely serve, it's not a good sign.
LaFuria is offline  
post #14 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-12-2012, 12:44 AM
Registered User
 
Mark Lenders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 16,647
                     
Re: Golden era of tennis

Quote:
Originally Posted by SheepleBuster View Post
Golden era of tennis like the golden era of baseball. lol. What a fucking joke. I am sick and tired of people shitting their pants and not talking about the big elephant in the room
Doping is definitely an issue to consider and one that does cross the mind when watching neverending grindathons with Nadal, Murray, Ferrer and others, essentially unbelievably physical matches.

But let's not accuse anyone without evidence. For all we know, they are just supreme athletes with supreme fitness. Unfortunately the doping control in tennis is horrible to put it mildly so it's easy to be suspicious, but until proof in contrary I'll believe the sport is clean.

Stricter doping control should be enforced though, to make sure there are no clouds of suspicion.

Last edited by Mark Lenders; 06-12-2012 at 01:43 AM.
Mark Lenders is offline  
post #15 of 110 (permalink) Old 06-12-2012, 12:47 AM
Registered User
 
GOAT = Fed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 9,975
                     
Re: Golden era of tennis

brb past year has seen only two players appear in slams
brb no.3 rank is a player who is 31 in 2 months and making SF of slams with relative ease
brb 28 of the past 29 slams have been won by 3 players
brb somehow 2 player making the finals of all slams constitutes a strong era
brb what about the other 126 players in the draw?
brb brb
GOAT = Fed is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome