Coincedence or not... - Page 2 - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #16 of 22 (permalink) Old 05-28-2012, 11:28 AM
Registered User
 
Foxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ruse
Age: 33
Posts: 2,600
                     
Re: Coincedence or not...

Fail.

Nadal - Djokovic 18:14 = 32
Nadal - Murray 13:5 = 18

Federer - Djokovic 14:11 = 25
Federer - Murray 7:8 = 15

Djokovic - Murray 8:5 = 13

It looks like Nadal has played Djokovic 7 times more than Federer played Djokovic.
Also Nadal has played Murray 3 times more than Federer played Murray and 5 times more than Djokovic played Murray.
So obviously Nadal is the one who is screwed up by the draws.

Adding to that Nadal - Federer 18:10 = 28 matches...

06.07.08 - The Resurrection Of Tennis!
01.02.09 - Resurrection Confirmed!
06.06.10 - Phoenix Rises From The Ashes!
04.07.10 - Rafa's Express Faster Than The Rest!
13.09.10 - Who is the GOAT now?!
05.06.11 - Where is clayGoat Djokovic?
11.06.12 - NoleSlam denied! 7th Heaven it is!
09.06.13 - Hi8tory!
09.09.13 - #Lucky13
08.06.14 - Unsto99able!
Foxy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #17 of 22 (permalink) Old 05-28-2012, 11:31 AM
Registered User
 
TennisOnWood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,015
                     
Re: Coincedence or not...

Please call Mulder and Scully

HIC IACET ARTHURUS REX QUONDAM REXQUE FUTURUS — "Here lies Arthur, the once and future king."
TennisOnWood is offline  
post #18 of 22 (permalink) Old 05-28-2012, 12:05 PM
Banned!
 
ServeVolley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,373
                     
Re: Coincedence or not...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxy View Post
Fail.

Nadal - Djokovic 18:14 = 32
Nadal - Murray 13:5 = 18

Federer - Djokovic 14:11 = 25
Federer - Murray 7:8 = 15

Djokovic - Murray 8:5 = 13

It looks like Nadal has played Djokovic 7 times more than Federer played Djokovic.
Also Nadal has played Murray 3 times more than Federer played Murray and 5 times more than Djokovic played Murray.
So obviously Nadal is the one who is screwed up by the draws.

Adding to that Nadal - Federer 18:10 = 28 matches...
We're talking about slam draws.
ServeVolley is offline  
post #19 of 22 (permalink) Old 05-28-2012, 12:06 PM
Registered User
 
hiperborejac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 33
Posts: 845
                     
Re: Coincedence or not...

After wining AO 2008 Average Serb would think like this: "They put Novak every time in harder half cause whole western world is against us. They don't want to see Serb winning slams so rather see Fedal final, giving Novak harder opponent in particular surface." Exception was RG 2009 when they realized that Novak came too close to Nadal (after MAdrid SF) and put Novak in Fed's half to tire him ahead of fresh Nadal. Another more realistic possibility is that uncle Tony rigged draws to give Nadal easier way to title. This year they put Novak vs Murray cause they thought that Murray will rise with Lendl and stop Novak's dominance (because Fedal weren't able to). So, everithing is clear
hiperborejac is offline  
post #20 of 22 (permalink) Old 06-22-2012, 10:58 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 23
Posts: 73
                     
Re: Coincedence or not...

Again...hahahah
Aleksa9 is offline  
post #21 of 22 (permalink) Old 06-22-2012, 10:59 AM
Proudly Exiled
 
Slade's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sun Ruler Plateau
Age: 25
Posts: 19,036
                     
Re: Coincedence or not...

It's rigged yo

Tennis Fucking Sucks


Federer was the pioneer of first-strike all-court tennis. This is the real tennis and the beautiful game. Never forget the beauty of what was tennis. Nadull and Fakervic don't win tennis matches. They simply outlast their opponent with endless grinding and stamina. That is ugly. Beautiful tennis is gone now. Never forget the good days of real tennis.


I respect Pure Tennis. First-strike, all-court, offensive tennis. Players who succeed here can succeed in both an offensive and defensive eras of tennis. Impure grinders like Nadull, Djokovic, and Murray could never win in an offensive tennis era.
Slade is offline  
post #22 of 22 (permalink) Old 06-22-2012, 11:02 AM
Registered User
 
Looner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13,143
                     
Re: Coincedence or not...

It's obviously random. Anyone who thinks there's a conspiracy is a crazy/idiot/unaware of the real world/mug .


The "Who plays tennis?" thread


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket Rod Laver
Roger is like a good red wine, he’s getting better with age.
Looner is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome