poor Fumus- must be awful to be so consumed with the need to disparage one person's achievements at every turn
- and to know in the end, that whatever you postulate here isn't a) reaching Fed's ears and b) will make absolutely no difference to his achievements or other people's perceptions of him and his career
I don't care what Federer thinks...LOL. I mean, you think I post this stuff because I want him to read it. I post my opinion here for the same reason everyone else does, I want to voice my point of view. I don't care if you agree with me or not.
I think that the Olympics are a joke event for professional tennis players and shouldn't even be held.
the more Roddick has declined, the more of a trolling parrot Fumus is. Coincidence or?
Well I guess, you'll be dealing with "trolling parrot Fumus" until I die then. It's really been about this forum and as I've increased with my knowledge about this sport, I get more sick of reading the stupid crap that's posted here. I'm here to liberate readers of this board from the tyrannical postings of crazy fan boys and trolls. I'm giving you a better class of poster.
Hahaha. Wow. Less meaningful, really... because his greatest rival is not good enough to reach the final?
This gets into a whole new dimension of retardation.
Of course it is....are you joking me? Those wins are tainted. It's like the 1987 NFL season...with scab players.
if nadal is beated by the nº100 it`s not federer fault.....
nadal never defeated federer in slam with the exception of roland garros when federer was in his peak , when nadal started with his peak and roger started his decline , nadal could beat him in wimbledon and australia , both slams in an more slower surface than before and he needed 5 very hard sets to defeated past peak federer.
nobody said nothing when nadal is winning very much in clay in a most weak era on clay of all times , I mean where are the greatest clay specialist of this era?????
his main rivals , are two fast courts specialists , nole and federer
Huh? Nadal has owned Fed forever...since he came on the scene. Pure PWNERSHIP.
Anyway it's just IF, no ? WHAT IF is the endless debate. For example, what happened if this era has more high-quality clay court specialists ?
You are correct....IF debates are pointless. I will say however, that winning RG and Wimbledon by dodging your main rival is definitely less meaningful.
Also, I am right about Federer never winning RG if he kept having to play Nadal in the final...and also never winning another GS if he had to play Nadal to win it.
Is it a coincidence. Fumus, tangy , n star are very active in this thread lol.
This is a classy thread, we are just a bunch of classy posters. Also, I'm awesome and any thread I post in becomes instantly better and more interesting. You should be thankful for the knowledge I am imparting on you. It's like pure tennis gold.
Fumus jumping on the clay courters back . Z zzzzzzzz wake me up when he wins a 250 off clay he he.
Last year he was Novaks BITCH , losing 7 in a row. Even fed never put up those numbers against his greatest rival .Fed destroyed roddicks career nothing u can do about it now Fumus.
The Olympics in tennis are meaningless + Murray being a choker + Federer's tainted GOAT status = Roddick sucks? Wait what?!
LOL, I love posting in the GM. I can really say anything...like I enjoy Macoroni and cheese and posters will say "Roddick sucks, get out of here!". Jeesh! I don't see how Roddick is relevant in this matter, except that you want to say hurtful things about my favorite. That just makes me sad. Really your words are like daggers that cut me to my very core. OUCH!