so fed would not beat nadal at RG in 100 tries when he had 4 years out of 5 when he had a chance to take it to 5 sets? and rome 2006 when he took it to match points?
need to work on math seriously.
You need to work on your tennis knowledge, Federer winning 3/5 sets against Nadal on clay, not going to happen. You mention Rome 06, when Fed was in his absolute peak, and Nadal was just a kid. And even then Nadal clutched it out.
He couldn't beat him then, he can't beat him now, he won't beat him later.