Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'? - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:20 PM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 703
                     
Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?

Nalbandian, Murray, Davydenko, Berdych...etc... all of these players are considered 'talented' by many who consider them to have the games to rival anyone when they're 'on'.

I disagree, because results (namely slam results) are the only thing that matters.

People make things too complicated by calling them 'head cases', 'chokers' etc. This leads to their 'talent' being vastly overrated.

I see it black and white.

Slam(s) = talented.

No slam = not talented.

Is Gaudio/Johansson more talented than Nalbandian/Murray/Berdych/Davydenko?

Hell yes.

You cannot even compare the talent of the former group to the second. Because the first group have the results.

And that's all that matters.
out_grinder is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:22 PM
Registered User
 
Snowwy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: A place that's too cold.
Posts: 23,318
                     
Re: Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?

Consistancy is the most underrated aspect of tennis and really sports among most observers.

Peter Polansky
Nestor - Chvojka - Pospisil - Raonic - Peliwo
Snowwy is online now  
post #3 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:28 PM
Registered User
 
Nole Rules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 23
Posts: 11,080
                     
Re: Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?

Quote:
Originally Posted by out_grinder View Post
I see it black and white.

Slam(s) = talented.

No slam = not talented.


So going by your logic, Roddick is more talented/gifted than Nalbandian?

Dirk Nowitzki Kevin Durant Kawhi Leonard
G O A T N E S S
Djokovic - Zverev - Tipsarevic - Tomic - Cilic - Sock - Lacko
Nole Rules is online now  
post #4 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:31 PM
Registered User
 
MuzzahLovah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Age: 27
Posts: 20,100
                     
Re: Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?

How many troll posts per day is the limit?

http://www.menstennisforums.com/atta...8&d=1224521470

Emperor Nishikori- King of Comeback- Slayer of Demons- Champion of Tokyo- Conquistador of Barcelona
MuzzahLovah is offline  
post #5 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:32 PM
.
 
rocketassist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 28,833
                     
Re: Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?

This is Rodre Fegassi's double account. FACT.

unbiased analyst extraordinaire
rocketassist is offline  
post #6 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:32 PM
Registered User
 
Bashak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,064
                     
Re: Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?

because of stuff like this:


Suicide Tennis Winner: Doha 2010, Basel 2009 FITD Winner: Auckland 2012, Nice 2010, London WTF 2009, Tokyo 2009, Roland Garros 2009, Paris 2008, Basel 2008 TT Finalist: Nottingham 2009, Savannah 2009, Marrakech 2011. TT Doubles Winner: Sarasota 2011 (w/ coasterman9 TT Doubles Finalist: Bergamo 2011 (w/ leoneo), Fergana 2009 (w/ catatonia) DTT Doubles Winner: Miami 2011 (w/Abollo)
Bashak is offline  
post #7 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:34 PM
Registered User
 
asmazif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,846
                     
Re: Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?

Not sure why I'm even responding to this, but they mean talent as in game/shots-wise, not talent in athleticism, consistency, physicality, mental functions and good ol' hard work. Bolelli and Cuevas are pretty talented guys, but have much, much lesser results than would be expected when contrasting games with say, Simon and Ferrer.

| Wins over 3+ of the Top 4. Players to reach all slam QFs+ in history. Hawkeye/Line Calls. QFs+ at Slams & Masters, but never Top 20.
Haas / The Fog / Tsonga / Gojowczyk / Brown / Nole / Mahut / Sijsling / Dolgo / Cuevas / Fed / Stan / Baker / Alund / Kei / Tursunov / Copil / Bolelli / Brands / Benneteau / Steps / Stakh / PHM
Rafter / Edberg / Henman / Stich / Safin / Gambill / Grosjean / Malisse / Gonzo / Llodra / Santoro / Agassi / Schalken / Nováček / Rosewall / H-T Lee / Kuerten / Boetsch / Pavel / Sundström / Björkman / Scud / El Aynaoui / Arazi / Calleri / Sampras / Nalbandian / Mosquito / Srichaphan / Pioline
asmazif is offline  
post #8 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:34 PM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sleeping in the house of my latest jumpoff.
Posts: 34,908
                     
Re: Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?

There is more to winning than talent. It's not all about that in sports in general, it takes more than that to be successful. Doesn't mean players whose results are weak don't have the talent to have better results.
Filo V. is offline  
post #9 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:37 PM
Registered User
 
Say Hey Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 565
                     
Re: Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?

So anyone who won a slam is by default more talented than someone who hasn't?

Talent has nothing to do with results, it has to do with potential. People in all aspects of life don't live up to their fullest potential, while others work their ass off and make up for their lack of talent by hard work and determination. Tennis is no different. Just because you're naturally more talented at something doesn't automatically mean you're more successful and accomplished than someone who is less talented.
Say Hey Kid is offline  
post #10 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:37 PM
Registered Fed fan
 
Kat_YYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 15,015
                     
Re: Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?


Roger Federer * Greatest Of All Time
Kat_YYZ is offline  
post #11 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:38 PM
Registered User
 
LocoPorElTenis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,603
                     
Re: Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?

Quote:
Originally Posted by out_grinder View Post
Is Johansson more talented than Nalbandian/Murray?

Hell yes.
LocoPorElTenis is offline  
post #12 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:38 PM
Registered User
 
GSMnadal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Netherlands
Age: 23
Posts: 16,533
                     
Re: Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?

They think talent = funky shots and some good clean technique.

Whereas the most important thing, what can win you slams, is probably just how hard you can consistently hit the ball, you always hear lower ranked players say that about guys like Nadal and Federer. That it's unreal how 'heavy' every ball is to cope with, due to the pace and spin.

Most of these 'talented' players don't have this kind of (consistent) weight in their shots.

RAFAEL NADAL

'Rafael Nadal is the best ever' - John McEnroe

1 AO - 9 RG - 2 W - 2 USO
GSMnadal is offline  
post #13 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:38 PM
Registered User
 
JediFed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Antonio Texas
Age: 34
Posts: 7,575
                     
Re: Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?

Quote:
So going by your logic, Roddick is more talented/gifted than Nalbandian?
Roddick has 10 GS SFs, more titles, more wins. So, yeah.

Nalbandian is talented, but he's not even in the top 10 of slamless players of all time. Only 11 titles, same as Henman.

Federer - Emperor of the Slams, King of Hard, Lord of the Australian Open, Lord of Wimbledon.

Sunset of Age
She's MY Miss MTF
Sweet, Sassy, Sophisticated

"Love has nothing to do with what you're expecting to get, only what you're expecting to give - which is everything. What you receive in return varies, but that really has no connection with why you give. You give because you love and cannot help giving." - K. Hepburn.
JediFed is offline  
post #14 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:41 PM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 703
                     
Re: Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
There is more to winning than talent. It's not all about that in sports in general, it takes more than that to be successful. Doesn't mean players whose results are weak don't have the talent to have better results.
I disagree.

I say Nalbandian is not talented. You say he is. We can go around in circles all day - there are no cold hard facts for you to say he is talented.

I say Federer is not talented. You say he is. I ask why, punk. You say he has 16 grand slam titles. I lose the argument.

Unless you have something to back it up, you can't go claiming that x player without a single grand slam is talented.

And to the guy who asked is Roddick more talented than Nalbandian?

Hell yes.
out_grinder is offline  
post #15 of 122 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 08:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 30
Posts: 14,249
                     
Re: Why do people always say certain players without results are 'talented'?

Quote:
Originally Posted by out_grinder View Post
Slam(s) = talented.
Imagine a scenario in which a player who has never won a single match in their entire career (and who has received the most bagels of anyone in tennis history) suddenly got 6 walkovers in route to a slam final....and then his opponent retired due to an illness, making him the champion.

Is that player considered "talented"?
MIMIC is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome