So you are using RG performances as the sole criterion for judging a players career? Because you just said a moment ago that you were calling out Mcenroe and Samprass because they failed to adopt, yet I just countered your argument by using you God and you've gone back to using RG performances.
And lettuce beef real tea here, winning a career GS has lost it's aura since all the courts play at pretty much the same speed.
Also u aware?
I am calling out the so called all time greats failure to adapt to a particular surface. In both of their cases it happens to be RG. If Sampras won RG 10 times but didn't win wimby or USO, I would present exactly the same argument.
Career GS has lost no meaning. Only clueless nostalgia tards think otherwise. If it's so easy, why have only 2 players (both all time greats) managed to do it?