Federer and Nadal : two different ways of thinking what they control in a match - Page 2 - MensTennisForums.com
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #16 of 18 (permalink) Old 02-15-2012, 02:14 PM
When You're On The Poster
Johnny Groove's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Earth
Age: 27
Posts: 43,077
Re: Federer and Nadal : two different ways of thinking what they control in a match

Great analysis, duong.

Follow my Youtube Channel for all my matches
Follow me on IG for the latest news, vids, pics, and memes
Originally Posted by Rod Laver
We all choke. That’s all right. We’re not machines. What you have to learn is to accept that fact and not panic. It’s the panic that loses the matches, not the nerves.
Originally Posted by Gary Player
The harder you try, the luckier you get.
Johnny Groove is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #17 of 18 (permalink) Old 02-15-2012, 03:07 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 12,100
Re: Federer and Nadal : two different ways of thinking what they control in a match

Originally Posted by MaxPower View Post
Some people work twice as hard after a setback. Federer is definitely one of those guys. Many times in his career he raised his level in the very next tournament after a bad loss not because he didn't care but probably just because he cared so much. I think people on MTF often make the mistake of taking press conferences and his public persona a bit too seriously. What do we really know about what's going on in his head? Maybe the very fact that he tries to act like he doesn't care after certain losses means he cares even more than your average player. Some people build a wall and hide everything in themselves because it's too painful to deal with it directly and they could get emotional or say things they regret. I think there is a big difference between Federers public persona and the real Federer. Maybe there isn't but it's just a hunch I have. Hopefully he will open up more after his career.
I understand what you think, but I have another opinion : I wondered a lot about this difference between the public persona and what he thinks inside, especially about Nadal, because he was harder to understand for me than Federer,
but I came to the conclusion (at least temporarily ) that these constant ways they did analyze their matches really expressed their thoughts (I often say that people shouldn't cut every interview's word too thinly, but when some points are constant in many interviews, that's different imo).

That's the main point of my long post : making a link between what they constantly say to analyze their matches in interviews and their attitude during these matches, as I said not necessarily "natural" attitude" but an "attitude which has been learnt to win".

I also tried that because I felt that if it was so unnatural for me to understand Nadal's way of thinking of his matches, it must also be as unnatural for other fans to understand what I feel about the way Federer analyses his matches. I'm upset when Nadal says he's not the favourite, other people are upset when Federer says his opponent was "lucky" or, as you say, when he says that he played a good match when he lost.

My point was mostly about these interviews : I can't go much further in analysing what each player should do, if Federer should be "more natural" or else.

I think they both learnt this attitude which for both has some negative points :
- Federer may lack some "rebellion attitude", he may also not be able to adapt enough during a match ;
- Nadal said himself that what his uncle had told him about his opponents being so much better than him has created an anxiety inside him (he said that in his autobiography)... and from what he said during last Roland-Garros especially, I had the impression that it was especially the case about Djokovic. It may be harder for him to get back confidence quick than for Federer.

I don't really think like you that Federer works much harder after his defeats than other players : he may work more than usually but I don't think more than other players. He has always insisted on being constant "if it has worked before, it can work again". That's rather the message of saving confidence which I kept from his words.

useless old guy

Last edited by duong; 02-15-2012 at 03:14 PM.
duong is offline  
post #18 of 18 (permalink) Old 02-15-2012, 05:38 PM
Time Violation's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mount Sharp
Age: 38
Posts: 17,690
Re: Federer and Nadal : two different ways of thinking what they control in a match

Lol, just listened Fed's interview at Rotterdam, the last question was what he can do about Nadal/Djokovic this year to make it happen... he said he just needs to do what he has been doing, and maybe to push more luck, something like that. Really spot on topic

?There?s so many athletes, tennis players around the world,? he continued, trying to put his life into some kind of perspective, ?they want to be the best in what they do. They want to succeed. Many of them, they don?t succeed in the end. I?m fortunate to have this opportunity and succeed.?
Time Violation is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome