Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic? - Page 3 - MensTennisForums.com
View Poll Results: Was Courier a greater claycourter than Fed/Nole?
Courier 2 RGs>FedNole 1 RG/case closed. 11 17.46%
FedNole>Courier, the Nadal factor has limited their success 18 28.57%
Federer>Courier>Nole, Nole has to win an RG to be in that cathegory 23 36.51%
Nole>Courier>Federer, Nole can still win 2 RGs, Fed cant. 11 17.46%
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-30-2012, 09:22 PM
Registered User
 
FairWeatherFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 969
                     
Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Yes, and Courier is also a greater claycourter than Nadal.
FairWeatherFan is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-30-2012, 09:22 PM
Registered User
 
Jimnik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 20,927
                     
Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Only 1 RG title for Fedbot but he was also runner-up 4 times. Plus he has more clay masters.

Federer > Courier > Djokovic

Until proven otherwise.
Jimnik is offline  
post #33 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-30-2012, 11:14 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
sexybeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,633
                     
Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by latso View Post
Borg, Lendl, Courier, Muster, Kuerten, Nadal

Those are the ultimate clay monsters from the 70s up.

Djokovic and Federer are like the McEnroe, Agassi, Stich, Coretja or Ferrero of their time, not even Bruguera.

So no comparison is even possible. Even if Federer wins one more RG he'd be a Bruguera.


So, Courier is a "clay monster" and on another cathegory than Bruguera? Up there with Nadal, Borg and Muster. You know they all won +30 clay titles and that Courier won only 5 titles, right?

From the 70s up you also have Nastasse and Vilas who were way superior to Courier on clay and won 70 clay titles between them, so I really dont know where you got in your mind that Courier is one of the 5 giants of this surface? Wouldnt have him in my top 15 list.

You rank Agassi in another cathegory, but they were not far from equals on clay during Courier's prime. Courier just had a slight edge against Agassi when they were young but arguably you could say Agassi in the long run catched up with Courier and achieved almost as much as Courier on clay.

Also, if Federer won another RG I would put him somewhere close to Lendl on clay.

All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.

Last edited by sexybeast; 01-31-2012 at 12:58 AM.
sexybeast is offline  
post #34 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-30-2012, 11:15 PM
Registered User
 
SetSampras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 32
Posts: 3,274
                     
Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Courier at his peak in the early 90s? Yes he was a better clay courter then Nole and Fed. But he went downhill fast.
SetSampras is offline  
post #35 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-30-2012, 11:25 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
sexybeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,633
                     
Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SetSampras View Post
Courier at his peak in the early 90s? Yes he was a better clay courter then Nole and Fed. But he went downhill fast.
Well, I cant expect you to say anything else about anyone playing in Sampras' era. I would love to hear some reasoning and not only statements.

All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
sexybeast is offline  
post #36 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-31-2012, 08:48 PM
Registered User
 
Uncle Latso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Age: 38
Posts: 11,879
                     
Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sexybeast View Post


So, Courier is a "clay monster" and on another cathegory than Bruguera? Up there with Nadal, Borg and Muster. You know they all won +30 clay titles and that Courier won only 5 titles, right?

From the 70s up you also have Nastasse and Vilas who were way superior to Courier on clay and won 70 clay titles between them, so I really dont know where you got in your mind that Courier is one of the 5 giants of this surface? Wouldnt have him in my top 15 list.

You rank Agassi in another cathegory, but they were not far from equals on clay during Courier's prime. Courier just had a slight edge against Agassi when they were young but arguably you could say Agassi in the long run catched up with Courier and achieved almost as much as Courier on clay.

Also, if Federer won another RG I would put him somewhere close to Lendl on clay.
Ask the Mods to make your opinions sticky.

Clearly you consider your opinion as the very truth and others opinions are laughable, so why even having other opinions

Courier was rulling RG for some years and he was as dominant as the guys i mention.

That's my impression and that's what i know for myself.

Your stats are just stats.

Federer winning RG was a fluke and this comes from a fan of the guy. Everybody knows this.
If Rafa doesn't participate Roger might snatch another one somewhere in case he pulls some magic inside outs again against mediocre competition to save his life...and he'd still be near Bruguera category, coz the ruller of this time, on clay is Nadal and that's it.

Just as Courier was absolutely dominant in his time. Agassi never was. He's like Federer a player who adjusted his huge talent for all other kinds of courts to be competitive enough on clay, but that's not a great clay courter.

He's a Milky Way distance better player, but not a greater clay courter.

IMO
Uncle Latso is offline  
post #37 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-31-2012, 10:49 PM
Registered User
 
bouncer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,255
                     
Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophocles View Post
It's far enough to say Fed's a greater clay-courter. Djokovic, no - not yet.
not yet LOL who else did won back to back Rome and Madrid over the greatest claycourter ever in only 14 days LOL

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloren View Post
Fraud's luck is absolutely disgusting.

FEDAL RIVALRY = >>>CLICK<<<
bouncer7 is offline  
post #38 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-31-2012, 10:52 PM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5,509
                     
Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bouncer7 View Post
not yet LOL who else did won back to back Rome and Madrid over the greatest claycourter ever in only 14 days LOL
2 RG > Madrid,Rome
LawrenceOfTennis is offline  
post #39 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-31-2012, 10:59 PM
Registered User
 
bouncer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,255
                     
Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LawrenceOfTennis View Post
2 RG > Madrid,Rome
no matter that, he said djoker is not great claycourter. And probably will finish career with 4x or more clay titles than Courier

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloren View Post
Fraud's luck is absolutely disgusting.

FEDAL RIVALRY = >>>CLICK<<<
bouncer7 is offline  
post #40 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-31-2012, 11:54 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
sexybeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,633
                     
Cool Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by latso View Post

Just as Courier was absolutely dominant in his time. Agassi never was. He's like Federer a player who adjusted his huge talent for all other kinds of courts to be competitive enough on clay, but that's not a great clay courter.

He's a Milky Way distance better player, but not a greater clay courter.

IMO
Courier was dominant like Nadal but won only 5 titles on clay?

So, Federer "just adjusted" to clay but the american Courier was born on red claycourts like Nadal in Mallorca?

How is Federer like Agassi? Agassi never played a full clay season, he prepared for RG relaxing on the Miami beaches just hoping he could go in with his flat shots and taking the ball on the rise like on hardcourt.

All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
sexybeast is offline  
post #41 of 61 (permalink) Old 02-01-2012, 12:01 AM
country flag HKz
Hakeem
 
HKz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mesa
Posts: 5,234
                     
Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bouncer7 View Post
no matter that, he said djoker is not great claycourter. And probably will finish career with 4x or more clay titles than Courier
Gee, another Djokotard trying to jump any comment that doesn't say "Novak is #1"

Sophocles didn't say Djokovic wasn't great on clay, clearly it was just a comparison to Courier. Either way, in truth, Djokovic doesn't deserve to be in the same sentence, he has yet to even reach one RG final, who cares about those MS events right now.

Sure, Nadal has prevented Novak from reaching the final of RG several times, but to even make the final was not guaranteed those years he made the SFs against Nadal. Even if he made the final those two years, he would of played against Federer and I doubt Federer would have lost if they met in 2007. 2008 could have gone either way, but I would still give the edge to Federer. Then of course we all know Djokovic hasn't met Nadal since 2008 at RG.

Federer / Haas / Safin / Gaudio / Kuerten / Youzhny / Nadal / Gonzalez / Ljubicic / Hewitt / Soderling / Wawrinka / Coria / Nalbandian / Kohlschreiber
HKz is offline  
post #42 of 61 (permalink) Old 02-03-2012, 03:50 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10,825
                     
Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SetSampras View Post
Courier at his peak in the early 90s? Yes he was a better clay courter then Nole and Fed.
I have to agree with SSS here.

Peak Courier would cream both Nole and Fed on clay, he would not even lose a set if the played doubles against him.

But of course, Courier, Fed and Nole would lose against Sampras in his fabled Rome 94 form, the pinnacle of clay court tennis. Sampras would make it competitive playing against the 3 on the other side of the net at the same time.

Nole and Fed benefit from a weak era. If they played in Sampras era, they would both be slamless, and they would both be Sampras's turkeys.
BigJohn is offline  
post #43 of 61 (permalink) Old 02-03-2012, 03:58 AM
Registered User
 
Roddickominator's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Age: 31
Posts: 1,962
                     
Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJohn View Post
I have to agree with SSS here.

Peak Courier would cream both Nole and Fed on clay, he would not even lose a set if the played doubles against him.

Nole and Fed benefit from a weak era. If they played in Sampras era, they would both be slamless, and they would both be Sampras's turkeys.
You are absolutely right. Peak Courier, which unfortunately lasted not very long at all, was an elite clay courter. Better than Roger and Novak for sure. If you're looking at sustained excellence then he obviously isn't your guy, but peak form you will find few better.
Roddickominator is offline  
post #44 of 61 (permalink) Old 02-03-2012, 03:59 AM
Registered User
 
TennisGrandSlam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hong Kong SAR, China
Age: 36
Posts: 1,662
                     
Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Courier is strong forehand,

and also play well in baseline,

but he is not clay expert (like Chang).
TennisGrandSlam is offline  
post #45 of 61 (permalink) Old 02-03-2012, 04:21 AM
Registered User
 
fast_clay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: ₫ṿﻁᶫỉᾔﺍᶏ
Posts: 15,726
                     
Re: Does anyone believe Jim Courier was a greater claycourter than Federer/Djokovic?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sexybeast View Post
Lets look at Courier's final opponents in his 5 big clay finals:

Won against:

Agassi 1991 RG final, Korda in 1992 RG final, Carlos Costa in Rome final 1992, Goran Ivanisevic in Rome final 1993.

Lost against: Sergi Bruguera in 1993 RG final.

So, his only though claycourter in a big clay tournament final was the one he lost to?

Compare with Federer:

Won against: Safin in Hamburg 2002 final, Coria in Hamburg 2004 final, Gasquet in Hamburg 2005 final, Nadal in Hamburg 2007 final, Nadal in Madrid 2009, Soderling in RG 2009.

Lost to: Nadal x 10 between 2006-2011 RG and master series finals and Mantilla 2003 Rome.

Djokovic won against: Nadal in ROme and Madrid 2011, Wawrinka in Rome 2008

Lost to: Nadal x2 (and Nadal x6 in SFs of RG and master series)

I dont know what though opponents Courier was playing on clay, but Ivanisevic, Korda and Agassi in big clay finals doesnt compare to what Djokovic and Federer is facing.
i'm sorry but carlos costa is a high quality finalist at the age... solid top tenner built on clay results

Quote:
Originally Posted by SelvenluvJo View Post
why are you so seriously
fast_clay is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome