Federer on surface homogenisation - Page 12 - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #166 of 186 (permalink) Old 05-12-2012, 04:17 AM
Faithful Txurigorri
 
Arkulari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Age: 32
Posts: 24,903
                     
Re: Federer: "These days players have same speed everywhere"

Quote:
Originally Posted by gulzhan View Post
Has any player asked for permission to use different shoes? Come on, Madrid may be called clay but when it's so fast and slippery, it's a different surface. At least as far as the muscles are concerned
I don't think there are shoes tailor made for the surface but I believe next year it won't be as slippery, and it is still clay, not hardcourt nor grass

Rafael "The Matador of Spin" Nadal
Roger “The Magician of Precision” Federer
Del Potro, Ferrer, Haas, Zeballos


Arkulari is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #167 of 186 (permalink) Old 05-12-2012, 04:31 AM
Registered User
 
BroTree123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 18,500
                     
Re: Federer: "These days players have same speed everywhere"

It's fun to bitch and hate

Quote:
Hian about himself
Quote:
No words can describe me.
Without me, it would be just aweso.
No shit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTwEeZi View Post
Never held a racquet in my life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTwEeZi View Post
I've played the game for close to 10 years. This should come as no surprise to many.

Banned Users
BroTree123 is online now  
post #168 of 186 (permalink) Old 05-12-2012, 05:09 AM
the pirate queen.
 
Pirata.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: usa
Age: 28
Posts: 13,370
                     
Re: Federer: "These days players have same speed everywhere"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sri View Post
Let's look at it this way. For at least six years, aggressive players have been disadvantaged by slowing down of courts all through the season.

And the minute the trend reverses in just one tournament, the boycott threats and blackmailing tactics begin?
Not a single lie detected in this post.

Rafael Nadal & Novak Djokovic: The Evoulution of a Handshake
federer ferrer wawrinka raonic flopez istomin mannarino pospisil
verdasco

Quote:
Originally Posted by QuitYerWhining View Post
Ever trolled, ever failed, no matter.
Post again, troll again, troll harder.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clay Death View Post
mods drag this thread outside and have several spotted hyenas shit on it for 4 straight days. you may have to bribe the hyenas but they will shit on it.
Pirata. is offline  
post #169 of 186 (permalink) Old 11-22-2012, 02:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,524
                     
Surface homogenization discussions - what about technology?

I think court speed and surface variety rather than homogenization is great and all, but why stop there? What about the single most important factor impacting playing styles??? I'm talking, of course, about the rackets! What's under the players' feet becomes a minor issue in this context. Because the difference between a wooden racket, a 90's racket and a modern racket is SO much more meaningful than the difference between RG and Wimbledon, or the difference between Indian wells and one of those really fast, minor, february indoor tournaments that I don't watch but everyone says are the fastest courts on the tour... So, if the objective is a smorgasbord of successful playing styles, then isn't the optimal solution actually a variation in racket technology? If you want more finesse and volleying at Wimbledon, maybe we should bring back wooden rackets! Faster grass courts/balls will only mean serve-athons anyway.
Mjau! is offline  
post #170 of 186 (permalink) Old 11-22-2012, 02:41 AM
Registered User
 
GOATsol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 22
Posts: 2,910
                     
Re: Surface homogenization discussions - what about technology?

Why use a different font?

And no one is bringing wooden rackets back, so the solution is to speed the courts up.

GOATsol is offline  
post #171 of 186 (permalink) Old 11-22-2012, 02:43 AM
Registered User
 
Freak3yman84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 12,445
                     
Re: Surface homogenization discussions - what about technology?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mjau! View Post
maybe we should bring back wooden rackets!
This is almost sig-worthy!

Oh Sheesh Y'all, 'Twas A Dream

Number of Times I've Cried Over Sucking at FITD: All but seven

W Houston and Samarkand Singles W Charlottesville W Lermontov W ATP Bastad W Bol Fut W Orleans (w/MathMul) W Cordenons (w/dinkulpus) Tashkent S&D (w/ Mr Brightside)

Quote:
Originally Posted by @Sweet Cleopatra View Post
I like how you make me appreciate my life by comparing it to yours then I take a deep breath and say: Thank God..
Freak3yman84 is offline  
post #172 of 186 (permalink) Old 11-22-2012, 02:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,524
                     
Re: Surface homogenization discussions - what about technology?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOATsol View Post
Why use a different font?
The standard one is boring.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOATsol View Post
And no one is bringing wooden rackets back, so the solution is to speed the courts up.
Not with that attitude!
Mjau! is offline  
post #173 of 186 (permalink) Old 11-22-2012, 02:50 AM
Registered User
 
GOATsol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 22
Posts: 2,910
                     
Re: Surface homogenization discussions - what about technology?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak3yman84 View Post
This is almost sig-worthy!
You say that about everything but never put anything fun in your sig.

GOATsol is offline  
post #174 of 186 (permalink) Old 11-22-2012, 02:51 AM
Registered User
 
End da Game's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,523
                     
Re: Surface homogenization discussions - what about technology?

modern rackets helps produce more attacking tennis, allowing true talents to flourish so this isn't a problem at all

the grindfest court surfaces on the other hand......
End da Game is offline  
post #175 of 186 (permalink) Old 11-22-2012, 02:53 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,524
                     
Re: Surface homogenization discussions - what about technology?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak3yman84 View Post
This is almost sig-worthy!
I think it's a GREAT idea... You're just afraid to think outside the box!
Mjau! is offline  
post #176 of 186 (permalink) Old 11-22-2012, 02:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,524
                     
Re: Surface homogenization discussions - what about technology?

Quote:
Originally Posted by End da Game View Post
modern rackets helps produce more attacking tennis, allowing true talents to flourish so this isn't a problem at all

the grindfest court surfaces on the other hand......
No, they help eliminating true attacking tennis and significantly devalues several historically important shots (slice, volley). Thus hurting both attacking tennis and true talent.
Mjau! is offline  
post #177 of 186 (permalink) Old 11-22-2012, 11:04 AM
Registered User
 
Sophocles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Age: 42
Posts: 8,991
                     
Re: Surface homogenization discussions - what about technology?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mjau! View Post
No, they help eliminating true attacking tennis and significantly devalues several historically important shots (slice, volley). Thus hurting both attacking tennis and true talent.
This is in fact true.

"There is no such thing as 'the world'." - Enoch Powell.
Sophocles is offline  
post #178 of 186 (permalink) Old 11-22-2012, 11:25 AM
Banned!
 
heya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,580
                     
Re: Federer on surface homogenisation

It didn't bother Federer until he
lost to real champions.

Only Safin beat the number 1
(the most infamous inflated slam winner) - Safin faced 4 match points vs. Flukerer

Roddick is the only number 1 in history who couldn't beat top 10 opponents in Olympics & Davis Cup ties.

Roddick & Hewitt never beat the top 2 seeds in Slams.

Djoker, Nadal, Murray, Ferrer & Del Potro beat top 2 players in Slams.

Djoker beat all top 3 seeds in a Masters Series event.
Federer never did.
heya is offline  
post #179 of 186 (permalink) Old 11-22-2012, 01:14 PM
Registered User
 
manadrainer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 33
Posts: 2,214
                     
Re: Federer on surface homogenisation

Quote:
Originally Posted by heya View Post
It didn't bother Federer until he
lost to real champions.

Only Safin beat the number 1
(the most infamous inflated slam winner) - Safin faced 4 match points vs. Flukerer

Roddick is the only number 1 in history who couldn't beat top 10 opponents in Olympics & Davis Cup ties.

Roddick & Hewitt never beat the top 2 seeds in Slams.

Djoker, Nadal, Murray, Ferrer & Del Potro beat top 2 players in Slams.

Djoker beat all top 3 seeds in a Masters Series event.
Federer never did.
Fed is a talentless mug. He fluked 17 slams, 6 WTF, 302 weeks at #1. His luck is disgusting.

8th day of July 2012: 7-time Wimbledon champion!

Once upon a time there was a myth about strong and weak eras. On this glorious day the clownery was eventually unmasked: 30 y.o. past-prime daddy Fed became #1 once again in the supposed strong "Spartan" era with his rivals at their peak.
And they all lived happily ever after.
Long live King Federer!


17 Grand Slam titles
7 Wimbledon titles
302 weeks at #1
Legend
manadrainer is offline  
post #180 of 186 (permalink) Old 11-22-2012, 02:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,004
                     
Re: Roger admitted that surface homogenization helped him and Rafa

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadruple Tree View Post
19 year old Federer beat Sampras on the old Wimbledon grass playing serve and volley when Pete was on a 30 match winning streak. It was the match of 2001, so you are either like 10 years old or just being a willful idiot. Since you've heard of Laver, I'm going with the latter.
Roger then lost to a much lesser player than Pete in the following round. Yes, Roger did play great that day, which I am sure Pete was not expecting in an early round match. Sort of like Rosol beating Nadal. He played way above his normal level for a whole match. Unlike Roger, however, it seems that Rosol has had his only day in the sun. If a lesser player is going to beat a top player, especially in a slam, an early round match is usually the time to do it.
thrust is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome