More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet - Page 2 - MensTennisForums.com
View Poll Results: Who is more talented?
Sebastien Grosjean 41 57.75%
Richard Gasquet 30 42.25%
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #16 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 01:19 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 16,073
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

Gasquet.

Grosjean was the better player though.
philosophicalarf is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #17 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 01:23 AM
Registered User
 
Dyraise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 369
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grassquet View Post
Gasquet's serve is underrated. Pretty good shot overall. But his fragile shoulder prevent him from using the full capacity of this shot.
And talking about his forehand would be a very long story but in a nutshell his forehand was pretty good in his young years. Then he modified it (with Benhabiles) and the shot turned into a wreck. Naturally, it was a good shot and he proves it when he uses his attacking forehand (lethal weapon) but his defensive and "waiting-shot" forehand was definitely altered, it's not his natural shot. Nevertheless I agree that Federer is more gifted than Richard in the forehand side of course.
Movement is not a technical skill so irrelevant in my point.

I write in english as Nadal speaks it.


Rafa in Two or Three
Dyraise is offline  
post #18 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 03:35 AM
Registered User
 
Mystique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Age: 24
Posts: 2,727
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

Grosjean by a country mile. Gasquet is overrated.

"In my opinion he's the best player ever. When you play tennis, playing Federer is kind of a dream because you can see he does everything you would love to do on the court" - Fabrice Santoro
Mystique is offline  
post #19 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 04:34 AM
Registered User
 
Saberq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7,983
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grassquet View Post
Gasquet is more naturally talented than Federer. Hard to believe but that's true. However, in professional tennis, natural talent is just one of several factors in order to be successful. And Richard sucks big time in the others factors whereas Fed is quite excellent in all of them.


I dont know who is a bigger mug you or ossie ................
Saberq is offline  
post #20 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 04:57 AM
Registered User
 
SaFed2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 5,345
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

Two of my favorite players! I feel that overall Grosjean was more talented. He had a better serve and a much better forehand = two of the most important shots in tennis. I also feel that Grosjean had the better all around game. As amazing as Gasquet is playing from 20 feet behind the baseline is not going to get you anywhere too often. He seems to need way too much preparation time to his his shots. Even his amazing BH, he needs a lot of time to actually hit them.

PAW Singles Ranking - 396
TITLES (TMS Rome 04', Rolland Garros 04', Wimbeldon 04')
RUNNER-UP (Rosmalen 04' US Open 04')
SaFed2005 is offline  
post #21 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 05:01 AM
.
 
rocketassist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 28,693
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyraise View Post
He's right.

Movement isn't a tennis talent. It's an athletic trait.

unbiased analyst extraordinaire
rocketassist is offline  
post #22 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 05:27 AM
Registered User
 
leng jai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oxford (at heart)
Age: 28
Posts: 23,640
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketassist View Post
He's right.

Movement isn't a tennis talent. It's an athletic trait.
Tennis related body position and footwork isn't an athletic trait.

WARNING: This signature may contain extreme traces of bullying and glory hunting
TOMMY HASS
0 slams () and 0 finals
0 consecutive weeks at world no. 1
0 consecutive Laureus World Sports Awards
0 times qualified for YEC
3-13 H2H against Rogi Featherer
0-5 H2H against Rafito Nadal
Career low ranking: 1,241 (26.06.1995)
0 fake mullets flaunted in Roland Garros finals.
0 double bagels consumed against Raonic on grass
1 first name in common with Tommy Robredo
leng jai is offline  
post #23 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 05:40 AM
Registered User
 
fast_clay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: ₫ṿﻁᶫỉᾔﺍᶏ
Posts: 15,726
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

if you take court sense and overall shotmaking into account, you'd go with grosjean... grosjean actually converted his talent into results to the max pretty much...

what makes this choice reasonably hard is the fact that gasquet's talent is actively being used not to overcome his opponent, but to overcome several glaring technical deficiencies in his own game - most notably his forehand which belongs in another age... what a waste of talent...

Quote:
Originally Posted by leng jai View Post
Tennis related body position and footwork isn't an athletic trait.
yes... spacial awareness (shape around contact) is definitely not an athletic trait... and more a tennis specific (or instrument based sport) talent...

initial reaction and finding your way to that position is more athletic...

Quote:
Originally Posted by SelvenluvJo View Post
why are you so seriously
fast_clay is offline  
post #24 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 05:54 AM
Registered User
 
green25814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Age: 26
Posts: 4,302
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

Grosjean by a country mile

Gasquet has a pretty backhand and fuck all else

I love all aspects of TENNIS.

Federer - The Artist
Murray - The Tactician
Nalbandian - The Ballstriker
Llodra - The S/V
green25814 is offline  
post #25 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 06:48 AM
Registered User
 
Mystique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Age: 24
Posts: 2,727
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grassquet View Post
Gasquet of course. This kid is more talented technically than Federer but he wastes all the genius because he is mentally, tactically, physically and psychologically a massive joke.
Grosjean is the best player cause only results matter.
WTF are you smoking? Gasquet is a mental midget who is overrated by most people. He has a flashy backhand (I agree, pure joy to see that in full flight) but pretty much all else sucks most of the time.
Just coz he can run around hitting a few good looking single handers doesnt mean he is as talented as people make out of him. And dont even compare him with a guy like Federer. Federer can do more things with a tennis ball than that "kid" can dream of.

Grosjean is not only a more complete player (and even more fun to watch), he has had better results inspite of being a mental midget himself. He is better tennis player and thats the end of it.

"In my opinion he's the best player ever. When you play tennis, playing Federer is kind of a dream because you can see he does everything you would love to do on the court" - Fabrice Santoro
Mystique is offline  
post #26 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 07:59 AM
country flag n8
 
n8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 31
Posts: 7,309
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

Quote:
Originally Posted by philosophicalarf View Post
Gasquet.

Grosjean was the better player though.
Agreed. I believe results at a young age are a good measure of talent and Gasquet was one of the best juniors ever. In 2002 he won 2 boys' Grand Slams and was junior world number one. He was still young enough to play juniors in 2004. Also in 2002 he ranked in the top 200 at 16 years and 1 month. Back then a lot of people thought he would have a better career than Nadal (also a prodigy of course).

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Quote:
Originally Posted by n8 View Post
I think Kokkinakis will be the most successful player born in the 90s.
n8 is offline  
post #27 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 08:22 AM
Registered User
 
Imperfect Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 800
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

Game wise, arguably Richard but physically, Sebastian hands down.
Imperfect Angel is offline  
post #28 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 08:35 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Forehander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,403
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grassquet View Post
Gasquet's serve is underrated. Pretty good shot overall. But his fragile shoulder prevent him from using the full capacity of this shot.
And talking about his forehand would be a very long story but in a nutshell his forehand was pretty good in his young years. Then he modified it (with Benhabiles) and the shot turned into a wreck. Naturally, it was a good shot and he proves it when he uses his attacking forehand (lethal weapon) but his defensive and "waiting-shot" forehand was definitely altered, it's not his natural shot. Nevertheless I agree that Federer is more gifted than Richard in the forehand side of course.
Movement is not a technical skill so irrelevant in my point.
There is definitely technical skill involved when we talk about movement in tennis. Gasquet when watching live is very impressive and is clearly one of the most talented by miles, but he is no Federer, who seems to be on another planet when stepping onto the tennis court wielding a tennis racquet.

The BIGGEST (borderline delusional) fan of players on General Message Board according to Forehander:
Grigor Dimitrov: FedererBulgaria
Borna Coric: Crowdmaker
Nick Krygios: Dan.
Tommy Haas: Leng Jai
Sebastien Grosjean: Myself
Novak Djokovic: Chiico (Leader of the No1e Cult)
Forehander is offline  
post #29 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 08:57 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Paris
Age: 26
Posts: 6,118
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

Movement is an athletic skill. Rocketassist is right. Or at least it's 90% physical and 10% technical.
Roger is an awesome athlete, that's why his movement is so good. Almost zero technical skill involved at all.
It's all about being fast and agile. Both physical traits.
Gagsquet is offline  
post #30 of 70 (permalink) Old 12-28-2011, 09:02 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Paris
Age: 26
Posts: 6,118
                     
Re: More talented: Sebastien Grosjean or Richard Gasquet

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystique View Post
He is better tennis player and thats the end of it.
You are right. But Gasquet was a better junior by a country mile. Then he fucked it up because natural talent is not enough in professional tennis and Gasquet sucks in all the others factors whereas Fed excels in all of them.
Gagsquet is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome