Navratilova said he would never be N°1 again...but her comments offensed his majesty who replied that he won Master
this question was asked by a journalist, not by Martina, and came after another one which was about him "sinking", etc. ... I'm impressed how the journalists actually want to bury him now, that he's finished, done, he has lost all motivation (read Bodo), etc :
what's the pleasure about burying a man ?
what's the journalist's honor or "feeling of job done" for that ?
Bodo said that once a journalist questioned Sampras's sincerity when he said that he thought he could still win a slam : he says that Sampras wanted to punch the journalist out (and he says Fed is too calm comparing to that)
And yes he won another grand slam. Because life and sport are like that : it's not all or nothing, it's not the favorite who always wins, and the other ones who are spectators, it's uncertainty
. And it's challengers having some hope to make better.
I really wonder : aren't there other topics than Federer in tennis ?
once they have buried him, what are they going to talk about ?
I'm impressed about all that, the topic now should be "Nadal or Djokovic" but ... no it seems