Regarding the idea that federer/nadal have surpassed agassi in that department, i want to say they haven't.
on top of the fact that today's era sucks, it should also be taken into account two objective factors:
1- when tennis wasnt so muggy, some ATP masters had 5-set finals
2- byes for the top players in their first rounds are also a muggy invention of the recent years.
i think it's fair to say that both federer and nadal could have less ATP 1000 if the conditions would have been without byes in the first round and with best of 5-set finals in some of the tourneys.
and yes, this point has been raised many times but it's still worthy to bring it again given that many tards are already making improper comparisons.
I wish the same. It was definetely better to watch best of 5 finals than these lame 40 minute matches. Many posters think those were of worse quality and lower level but it's not true. The last great final was the Federer-Nalbandian 2005.
The text in bold is true.