The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games - Page 3 - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 12:40 AM
Registered User
 
Roadmap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,236
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

I never said that Murray has the best forehand. You are the one who claimed that Djokovic is a far better returner than
Murray which is a ludicrous suggestion.
Roadmap is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 12:43 AM
Registered User
 
Roadmap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,236
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

Spindoctor What would a Nadull fan know about returning?
Roadmap is offline  
post #33 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 12:44 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sen'jin Village
Age: 32
Posts: 18,509
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadmap View Post
Spindoctor What would a Nadull fan know about returning?
About as much as Mugray fan would know about winning slams.
Topspindoctor is offline  
post #34 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 12:44 AM
Registered User
 
Roadmap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,236
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

Murray is a terrific returner and only haters would say otherwise.
Roadmap is offline  
post #35 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 12:44 AM
Registered User
 
Saberq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7,983
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadmap View Post
I never said that Murray has the best forehand. You are the one who claimed that Djokovic is a far better returner than
Murray which is a ludicrous suggestion.
never said far better ...just better ....like every non British fan and every expert says....how many set's has Novak won this year 6-0 6-1 and how many Murray?next thing you will say is that Andy is a better player
Saberq is offline  
post #36 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 12:45 AM
Registered User
 
Roadmap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,236
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

Spindoctor confirming he is a glory hunter.
Roadmap is offline  
post #37 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 12:47 AM
Registered User
 
Roadmap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,236
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

Murray could show himself to be a better player. We will not know until the end of their careers.
Roadmap is offline  
post #38 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 12:47 AM
.
 
rocketassist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 28,989
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspindoctor View Post
Mugray struggled to return Isner's serve on slow(ish) court of USO, he was struggling to break him and spent like 4 hours outlasting him physically because he couldn't do shit against his serve. Mugray is an overrated returner, sure he can return Nadal's serve like nothing (who can't), but the real test is against a BIG server and that is where Djoker is better.
it certainly wasn't the return that was the problem in that match it was the fact Isner was playing brilliant from the baseline in sets three and four and outhitting Murray, but cause he's an 'all serve clown' you won't admit that.

BTW Djoker needed 5 sets to beat him on an indoor clay court in Davis Cup.

Murray's eaten Karlovic's serve up on a few occasions, whereas Djokovic hasn't. He hasn't faced any big servers this year and his return stats are skewed by facing clown serves like Nadal's.

unbiased analyst extraordinaire
rocketassist is offline  
post #39 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 12:49 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sen'jin Village
Age: 32
Posts: 18,509
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadmap View Post
Spindoctor confirming he is a glory hunter.
Not really, I would not be still supporting Nadal had I been a glory hunter like some posters here who jumped ship (Federer's_Mater, Sokk, Careergranslam etc) - I am just pointing out, that you shouldn't be such a vicious Mugraytard when your boy can't even win a set in a slam final despite his returning prowess
Topspindoctor is offline  
post #40 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 12:54 AM
Registered User
 
Roadmap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,236
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

Murray is not exactly the mentally strongest player in the history of the sport but has fine talent.
Roadmap is offline  
post #41 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 12:57 AM
Registered User
 
Saberq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7,983
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadmap View Post
Murray is not exactly the mentally strongest player in the history of the sport but has fine talent.
that is true what you said ...you see...you can make sense...
Saberq is offline  
post #42 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 12:59 AM
Registered User
 
Saberq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7,983
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketassist View Post
it certainly wasn't the return that was the problem in that match it was the fact Isner was playing brilliant from the baseline in sets three and four and outhitting Murray, but cause he's an 'all serve clown' you won't admit that.

BTW Djoker needed 5 sets to beat him on an indoor clay court in Davis Cup.

Murray's eaten Karlovic's serve up on a few occasions, whereas Djokovic hasn't. He hasn't faced any big servers this year and his return stats are skewed by facing clown serves like Nadal's.
Djokovic broke Tsonga at will sometimes at Wimbledon 2 days after your GOAT had only 1 break point
Saberq is offline  
post #43 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 01:00 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sen'jin Village
Age: 32
Posts: 18,509
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadmap View Post
Murray is not exactly the mentally strongest player in the history of the sport but has fine talent.
Whatever helps you sleep at night, I guess. Having talent does not make you a slam winner and many clowns like Mugcelo Rios proved it in the past
Topspindoctor is offline  
post #44 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 01:10 AM
Registered User
 
fast_clay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: ₫ṿﻁᶫỉᾔﺍᶏ
Posts: 15,726
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketassist View Post

Murray's eaten Karlovic's serve up on a few occasions, whereas Djokovic hasn't. He hasn't faced any big servers this year and his return stats are skewed by facing clown serves like Nadal's.
interesting point...

nadal has been violated so much by djokovic this year that nadal packs his own lube these days... nadal's poor serve has most definitely skewed the stats for 2011, nadal shouldn't be getting troubled as much on serve by djokovic than he is this year... nadal's drop in service form is the biggest loss of faith and/or ability in any single shot in a twelve month period that i have ever seen...

cheers clydey... one great thread in an ocean of shit...

Quote:
Originally Posted by SelvenluvJo View Post
why are you so seriously
fast_clay is offline  
post #45 of 100 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 01:28 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 528
                     
Re: The Relative Importance of Hold and Return Games

Its hard to pick between Murray and Djokovic returning wise. Its very close!

I think Djokovic returns first serves a bit better (like a percentage point) and Murray might deal with 2nd serves a bit better (like a percentage point). Novak's baseline is probably a bit better this year too, so the stats will be jilted. Anyway, I think Murray deals with spinny serves better than anyone i've ever seen, whereas Djokovic's general ability to peg even very hard serves deep at the servers feet is also revolutionary.

I have seen better return of first serves before (Hewitt, Fed in his prime, a few others) and I have seen better more aggressive 2nd serve returns (Nalbandian, Agassi etc) but yea overall its hard to argue that Murray and Djokovic are a cut above right now overall.
Haelfix is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome