But he lost 23 times against you.
's right. We have to also throw into the mix. But I do not think it is currently the decisive factor. But he has achieved in my opinion too much. Maybe this is crucial if I move him even closer after major victories. But 14 or 17 Grand Slam titles is a significant difference. At the present time there is no question that he must be the greater player than me.
Nah, these right after the match interviews are always like that. After effort it's hard to think. Plus like I said, he wanted to speak through an ATP official and we had like 2 minutes alone. I have interviewed him before when I worked at the challenger in Poland and he has been very explicit there.
We should be appreciative of Federer though, because we will never see anything like him again. The fact he can still compete for slams ever after the erosion of his physical skills is really a greater testament to the natural talent he has than the period of time when he was dominating the tour.