ATP-ITF Calendar/Schedule Suggestions, Shorter Season - Page 59 - MensTennisForums.com
View Poll Results: Which of these compulsory 1000 level events would you drop
05.03.2012 - Hard - BNP Paribas Open, Indian Wells, USA 10 7.09%
23.03.2011 - Hard - Sony Ericsson Open, Miami, USA 16 11.35%
01.05.2011 - Clay - Mutua Madrid Open, Madrid, Spain 14 9.93%
08.05.2011 - Clay - Internazionali BNL d'Italia, Rome, Italy 10 7.09%
08.08.2011 - Hard - Rogers Cup, Montreal, Canada 6 4.26%
14.08.2011 - Hard - Western & Southern Open, Cincinnati, USA 20 14.18%
09.10.2011 - Hard - Shanghai Rolex Masters, Shanghai, China 48 34.04%
07.11.2011 - Hard - BNP Paribas Masters - Paris, France 17 12.06%
Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #871 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 09:08 PM
Registered User
 
Castafiore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,954
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horatio Caine View Post
The Tour shouldn't be shortened (in weeks) anymore than it has been, though. Many of the lower-ranked players enter 28+ events per year and need the opportunity to appear in main tour events in order to survive financially.
One doesn't exclude the other, though.

One of the suggestions I've seen was that the tour as such should not be shortened so if they lower ranked players want to play from January to December in order to survive financially, they could.
But the obligatory season should be shorter with a proper off season.
Castafiore is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #872 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 09:13 PM
1,000 Baby!
 
nobama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jony Ive's design cave
Posts: 19,906
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt01 View Post
Doesn't mattter if it makes sense or if it benefits Fed or not..Paris Bery is evidence enough for me.
Yes it does because why would a player advocate something that most likely wouldn't benefit them? And Paris isn't that slow now so if anything the request at the time was probably to make it similar to Masters Cup in Shanghai vs. advocating a general slow down of all the surfaces. But since the general public and general tennis fan are used to 20-30 shot rallies and think that's how tennis should be played I don't see the surfaces speeding up anytime soon.

nobama is offline  
post #873 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 09:14 PM
Registered User
 
Looner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13,128
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt01 View Post
Doesn't mattter if it makes sense or if it benefits Fed or not..Paris Bery is evidence enough for me.
Are you some kind of super-mentally challenged person? Federer has been HURT multiple times by slow surfaces. It is Nadalito's uncle that has been lobbying hard to get the perfect events for his runt to play. Case in point, moving Rome after Madrid and having Madrid as a Masters 1000 before Hamburg (one of the oldest tournaments EVER). What about slowing down the AO and stupidly slow courts in the US this year coupled with slower balls. And do not even try mentionin the French this year as it's obvious people in France know a bit about tennis and are aware people are sick of stupid long and boring rallies which is why Paris-Bercy has been sped up and why they used balls that fly through the air faster (by Nadalito's racket sponsor btw). Wimbledon has been an all-together different atrocity in the past years.

I usually can't be arsed to answer such stupid posts but your deserves an award for being the stupidest of them all.
Looner is offline  
post #874 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 09:18 PM
Registered User
 
Matt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,773
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Looner View Post
Are you some kind of super-mentally challenged person? Federer has been HURT multiple times by slow surfaces. It is Nadalito's uncle that has been lobbying hard to get the perfect events for his runt to play. Case in point, moving Rome after Madrid and having Madrid as a Masters 1000 before Hamburg (one of the oldest tournaments EVER). What about slowing down the AO and stupidly slow courts in the US this year coupled with slower balls. And do not try talking about the French this year as it's obvious people in France know a bit about tennis and are aware people are sick of stupid long and boring rallies which is why Paris-Bercy has been sped up and why they used balls that fly through the air faster (by Nadalito's racket sponsor btw).

I usually can't be arsed to answer such stupid posts but your deserves an award for being the stupidest of them all.



If you knew anything about tennis you would know that Hamburg is actually SLOWER than Madrid and that these tournaments don't have anything to do with "Nadalito's uncle lobbying" which is only a prodict of your imagination.

And your argumentation re: Federer is so useless that I won't even bother further. If you don't have any arguments, just be quiet.

And YOU are asking me if I'm mentally challenged?
Matt01 is offline  
post #875 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 09:27 PM
Registered User
 
Looner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13,128
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

^^^
Typical answer from someone who has O (that is ZERO) arguments in his favour and conducts NO analysis whatsoever. Hamburg suits Roger Federer (his first big title is here) and Madrid is in Spain (that's too hard for you to see, I guess). Your statement that you don't need any evidence (as you provided NONE) is also enough to make me give up before starting because no amount of common sense is going to defeat your TARD logic.

Have nice wet dreams about Nadal.
Looner is offline  
post #876 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 09:31 PM
Registered User
 
Matt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,773
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Looner View Post
^^^
Typical answer from someone who has O (that is ZERO) arguments in his favour and conducts NO analysis whatsoever. Hamburg suits Roger Federer (his first big title is here) and Madrid is in Spain (that's too hard for you to see, I guess). Your statement that you don't need any evidence (as you provided NONE) is also enough to make me give up before starting because no amount of common sense is going to defeat your TARD logic.

Yeah, and the fact that Nadal beat Fed in the last Hamburg final and that Fed beat Nadal in the first Madrid final totally proves your point that replacing Hamburg with Madrid was a move of the eville Spanish Mafia to help Nadal


Quote:
Originally Posted by Looner View Post
Have nice wet dreams about Nadal.

Thanks, I will
Matt01 is offline  
post #877 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 09:31 PM
Registered User
 
guga2120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,148
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Looner View Post
Are you some kind of super-mentally challenged person? Federer has been HURT multiple times by slow surfaces. It is Nadalito's uncle that has been lobbying hard to get the perfect events for his runt to play. Case in point, moving Rome after Madrid and having Madrid as a Masters 1000 before Hamburg (one of the oldest tournaments EVER). What about slowing down the AO and stupidly slow courts in the US this year coupled with slower balls. And do not even try mentionin the French this year as it's obvious people in France know a bit about tennis and are aware people are sick of stupid long and boring rallies which is why Paris-Bercy has been sped up and why they used balls that fly through the air faster (by Nadalito's racket sponsor btw). Wimbledon has been an all-together different atrocity in the past years.

I usually can't be arsed to answer such stupid posts but your deserves an award for being the stupidest of them all.


Thanks, that was funny.
guga2120 is offline  
post #878 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 09:41 PM
1,000 Baby!
 
nobama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jony Ive's design cave
Posts: 19,906
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Castafiore View Post
For me, there are too many hardcourt events, whatever the pace, and not enough events on natural surfaces, esp. grass.


What evidence do any of you offer about what which players pushed for exactly and what not?
It's just a speculation at the moment.
Exactly it's just speculation.

nobama is offline  
post #879 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 09:45 PM
1,000 Baby!
 
nobama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jony Ive's design cave
Posts: 19,906
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Looner View Post
Are you some kind of super-mentally challenged person? Federer has been HURT multiple times by slow surfaces. It is Nadalito's uncle that has been lobbying hard to get the perfect events for his runt to play. Case in point, moving Rome after Madrid and having Madrid as a Masters 1000 before Hamburg (one of the oldest tournaments EVER). What about slowing down the AO and stupidly slow courts in the US this year coupled with slower balls. And do not even try mentionin the French this year as it's obvious people in France know a bit about tennis and are aware people are sick of stupid long and boring rallies which is why Paris-Bercy has been sped up and why they used balls that fly through the air faster (by Nadalito's racket sponsor btw). Wimbledon has been an all-together different atrocity in the past years.

I usually can't be arsed to answer such stupid posts but your deserves an award for being the stupidest of them all.
Paris Bercy is faster now so if players lobbied to slow it down they weren't very effective.

nobama is offline  
post #880 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 09:51 PM
Registered User
 
Looner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13,128
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

^^^

My point was that Paris-Bercy and the FO are one of the few that actually get it ie that spectators prefer a bit quicker points. The French took the step to speed up Paris-Bercy considerably (contrary to what's happening around them) to a point where Paris-Bercy is probably the fastest court on tour right now or at least its 2010 version. It was meant to show that the players' prayers were ignored here as opposed to listened to.
Looner is offline  
post #881 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 09:54 PM
Registered User
 
Matt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,773
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by nobama View Post
Paris Bercy is faster now so if players lobbied to slow it down they weren't very effective.

IIRC they made the court slower after the player's complaints and then made it faster again.
Matt01 is offline  
post #882 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 10:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,695
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by nobama View Post
Change DC to be every 2 or 4 years.
This (can't believe I agree with a poster named "nobama") but yes DC sort of looses it's importance when held every year. Could spread it out also - 2 rounds a year over 2 years instead of 4 rounds jammed in one year, none during the Olympics year.

Then make another one or two less mandatory 1000s - with maybe some requirement for court surface.

If tennis wants to attract more than just a few elitist athletes and fans there needs to be a lot of different tournaments in cities all over the world and at different levels of competition - broaden it's reach instead of cutting back.

Shortening the calendar just hurts the guys trying to move up, get points and make a few dollars to get to the next tournament. If ATP/ITF reduces slightly the number of mandatory tournaments, the top players can select to not play as much but guys trying to claw their way up still have opportunities.

Blaming the slower court surface is might as well blame the new racket and string technology that enables players to hit so hard or with more spin .

Last edited by Schu; 09-19-2011 at 10:06 PM.
Schu is offline  
post #883 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 10:08 PM
♥ eve ♥
 
bokehlicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lausanne
Posts: 40,775
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

Nadal is a sucker. Djokovic is a sucker. Murray is a sucker.
bokehlicious is offline  
post #884 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 10:24 PM
1,000 Baby!
 
nobama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jony Ive's design cave
Posts: 19,906
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schu View Post
Blaming the slower court surface is might as well blame the new racket and string technology that enables players to hit so hard or with more spin .
You could blame that too. But it's not like slower surfaces are some sort of technological evolution like strings or racquets. Unless there's something new & unique about the paint and sand they use to cover the courts.

nobama is offline  
post #885 of 1470 (permalink) Old 09-19-2011, 11:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,695
                     
Re: Player union call as injuries mount, scheduling issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by nobama View Post
You could blame that too. But it's not like slower surfaces are some sort of technological evolution like strings or racquets. Unless there's something new & unique about the paint and sand they use to cover the courts.
There probably is some new ultra high-tech compound in that stuff but yes have to agree with you again - I've had some nasty tennis elbow/shoulder from new rackets and strings. But back to the issue, it's the back to back to back matches and training for months at a time that take a toll on the body (and mind) more than court speed so cut back on mandatory schedule not worry about making points shorter with faster courts.

On the completely other hand - no one is forcing these guys to train and play non-stop, that's the price you pay for wanting to be at the top. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen... or at least out of the top 10.
Schu is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome