The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-17-2011, 03:24 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
LiamMFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 97
                     
The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

Firstly, I just want to put myself forward as the next in a line of millions of people to congratulate Djokovic on his achievements this year, and on his overall level of play. Both have been nothing short of extraordinary.

However, I just want to ask what the significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon are for him.

Clearly, if he wins them he'll ensure he goes down as a legend of the game overnight. To go unbeaten until after Wimbledon will be something I don't think could ever be matched.

But is it the case that he has to win at least one of them? Does he go back to square one if Nadal and/or Federer emerge victorious on both occasions?

I can imagine many of the posts on here would state that if that was the case once all is said and done after Wimbledon, but it would be a valid question. After all, how much of this run is down to confidence? Or has everything just clicked seemingly overnight as it once did with Federer?

I'm undecided. Midway through this run, I'd imagine he'd really only have seen the middle two grand slams as a bonus should he win them, given Nadal's dominance. But he's proven capable of blowing Nadal out the water, with his uncanny hitting from either side. It's literally been impossible for Nadal to get him on the backfoot for more than a couple of shots, if even that, before he muscles back into the dominant role in the rallies. Yet, if he can't do that on the biggest stage of all, what will that do to him? He's yet to have been put in that position during this run, and at sometime or another he is going to be. And if it's now, when he must feel that he's surely got the best chance ever of winning, he could crumble very quickly. Or he could genuinely be a new breed of Djokovic.
LiamMFC is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-17-2011, 03:31 PM
When You're On The Poster
 
Johnny Groove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Age: 27
Posts: 42,266
                     
Re: The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

If he wins both, he'll be on his way to the CYGS. The Holy Grail.

Follow my Youtube Channel for all my matches
Follow me on IG for the latest news, vids, pics, and memes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod Laver
We all choke. That’s all right. We’re not machines. What you have to learn is to accept that fact and not panic. It’s the panic that loses the matches, not the nerves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Player
The harder you try, the luckier you get.
Johnny Groove is offline  
post #3 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-17-2011, 03:35 PM
Registered User
 
Dougie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,907
                     
Re: The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

He doesn´t NEED to win either one this year, he´ll get many more chances. But I´m sure he´s really hoping his next GS will be some other than AO.
Dougie is offline  
post #4 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-17-2011, 04:41 PM
Registered User
 
hiperborejac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 34
Posts: 845
                     
Re: The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

He has momentum. If he is ever to take that double now it's the time. Fedal are in bad form (to their standards) and there's no match in mentality for him atm. The only question I think is, will he be able to pull it out physically. I don't think that he won't take both of W/RG some time in the future, but as a double pack it's now or never. And that would be the spark that will put him amongst the legends of sport and probably the only CYGS in Open Era.
hiperborejac is offline  
post #5 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-17-2011, 04:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 938
                     
Re: The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

He definitely needs to win at least one of them to really cement his status as the current #1. When you think of how good a top player's year was the first stat you look at is how many Slams did he win. If it's just one, then it wasn't an amazing season, 40+ win streak or not.
Kworb is offline  
post #6 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-17-2011, 08:22 PM
Registered User
 
ballbasher101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Age: 29
Posts: 4,894
                     
Re: The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dougie View Post
He doesn´t NEED to win either one this year, he´ll get many more chances. But I´m sure he´s really hoping his next GS will be some other than AO.
He definately needs a major outside the OZ open. He has the game to win at wimbledon which he truly wants this year. I expect him to win at least one more major this year. If he does not burn out he might just win the grandslam. He is that good this year.
ballbasher101 is offline  
post #7 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-17-2011, 10:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,928
                     
Re: The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by ballbasher101 View Post
He definately needs a major outside the OZ open. He has the game to win at wimbledon which he truly wants this year. I expect him to win at least one more major this year. If he does not burn out he might just win the grandslam. He is that good this year.
Neither he nor Nadal has "the game" to win at Wimbledon. Ten years ago they would be both be R1-R3 casaulties.

In todays tennis, not many people know how to play grass court tennis, and the courts are obviously slower. When the grass dwindles away and gets even slower and higher bouncing, they can obviously stand their grand though. I would not be surprised if one (or both) of these guys finds themselves in a big hole early on.

If Nadal changes his grip on his serve again he will probably be as dangerous as earlier years. Djokovic needs a good draw, but I still don't see him beeting Nadal, Fed, Söderling and Murray. A lot of dark horses like Malisse, Llodra, Karlovic and Lopez will also be difficult IMO.
Agrajag is offline  
post #8 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-17-2011, 10:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 43
Posts: 2,443
                     
Re: The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

I think winning RG and Wimbledon would be a strategic disadvantage.
r2473 is offline  
post #9 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-17-2011, 10:58 PM
Registered User
 
Alex999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kanata
Posts: 11,676
                     
Re: The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agrajag View Post
Neither he nor Nadal has "the game" to win at Wimbledon. Ten years ago they would be both be R1-R3 casaulties.

In todays tennis, not many people know how to play grass court tennis, and the courts are obviously slower. When the grass dwindles away and gets even slower and higher bouncing, they can obviously stand their grand though. I would not be surprised if one (or both) of these guys finds themselves in a big hole early on.

If Nadal changes his grip on his serve again he will probably be as dangerous as earlier years. Djokovic needs a good draw, but I still don't see him beeting Nadal, Fed, Söderling and Murray. A lot of dark horses like Malisse, Llodra, Karlovic and Lopez will also be difficult IMO.
Excuse me. What are you smoking? Nadal won W 2 times (he was a runner up in 2007) and Nole reached 2 semis and your opinion is that they don't have "the game" to win . This is MTF at it's best... I feel suicidal when I have to read something so stupid ...PLEASE HELP ME OUT, I CAN'T TAKE IT ANY MORE
Alex999 is offline  
post #10 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-17-2011, 11:25 PM
Banned!
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 9,577
                     
Re: The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex999 View Post
Excuse me. What are you smoking? Nadal won W 2 times (he was a runner up in 2007) and Nole reached 2 semis and your opinion is that they don't have "the game" to win . This is MTF at it's best... I feel suicidal when I have to read something so stupid ...PLEASE HELP ME OUT, I CAN'T TAKE IT ANY MORE

I think he means that their play styles aren't suited for "traditional" Wimbledon, which is big serve and focus on volley instead of all baseline.

Correct me if I'm wrong though.
SerialKillerToBe is offline  
post #11 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-17-2011, 11:34 PM
Registered User
 
DrJules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,594
                     
Re: The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by hiperborejac View Post
He has momentum. If he is ever to take that double now it's the time. Fedal are in bad form (to their standards) and there's no match in mentality for him atm. The only question I think is, will he be able to pull it out physically. I don't think that he won't take both of W/RG some time in the future, but as a double pack it's now or never. And that would be the spark that will put him amongst the legends of sport and probably the only CYGS in Open Era.
Rod Laver 2009 in 2nd year of open era.

The current greatness league of active players in order of achievements to date (a factual comparison rather than fan biased assessment):

Federer 17 GS, 6 Year End Masters, 24 Master Series.
Nadal 14 GS, 27 Master Series, 1 Olympic Gold.
Djokovic 9 GS, 4 Year End Masters, 24 Master Series.


DrJules is offline  
post #12 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-17-2011, 11:42 PM
Registered User
 
Alex999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kanata
Posts: 11,676
                     
Re: The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by hipolymer View Post
I think he means that their play styles aren't suited for "traditional" Wimbledon, which is big serve and focus on volley instead of all baseline.

Correct me if I'm wrong though.
um, nobody is playing S&W on grass any more (they slowed down W courts long time ago), it's all baseline play nowadays - "traditional Wimbledon" is a thing of the past.
Alex999 is offline  
post #13 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-17-2011, 11:50 PM
Banned!
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 9,577
                     
Re: The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex999 View Post
um, nobody is playing S&W on grass any more (they slowed down W courts long time ago), it's all baseline play nowadays - "traditional Wimbledon" is a thing of the past.
That's his point...
SerialKillerToBe is offline  
post #14 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-18-2011, 12:05 AM
Registered User
 
MaxPower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Age: 32
Posts: 7,805
                     
Re: The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

He should consider tanking them so he doesn't have to defend so many point...ohh wait.

Yes if Djokovic wins them he would have a shot at the most amazing season ever. But we will know this in a few months won't we? For all I know it is likely his shot at both the CYGS and going unbeaten all season will be over in 2 weeks or so. He has never been to the RG final before amazing shape or not. Rafa has also done only marginally worse season starts and then crashed and burned in some tournaments later. Also I seriously doubt he can win Wimbledon which is the slam I give the Djoker the worst odds to win. Right now many people in this forum is guilty of this:

MaxPower is offline  
post #15 of 18 (permalink) Old 05-18-2011, 12:11 AM
Registered User
 
ballbasher101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Age: 29
Posts: 4,894
                     
Re: The Significance of Roland Garros and Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agrajag View Post
Neither he nor Nadal has "the game" to win at Wimbledon. Ten years ago they would be both be R1-R3 casaulties.

In todays tennis, not many people know how to play grass court tennis, and the courts are obviously slower. When the grass dwindles away and gets even slower and higher bouncing, they can obviously stand their grand though. I would not be surprised if one (or both) of these guys finds themselves in a big hole early on.

If Nadal changes his grip on his serve again he will probably be as dangerous as earlier years. Djokovic needs a good draw, but I still don't see him beeting Nadal, Fed, Söderling and Murray. A lot of dark horses like Malisse, Llodra, Karlovic and Lopez will also be difficult IMO.
He reached the semis last year so he can play on green clay . He is a better player compared to last year. He has the best return of serve on tour at the moment which is a good advantage especially on grass were its tougher to break.
ballbasher101 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome