The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP level. - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 09:51 PM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sleeping in the house of my latest jumpoff.
Posts: 34,908
                     
The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP level.

In baseball in the states, there are certain levels to designate what a player is in their career. You have MLB, then AAA league, AA league, and A league. In the AAA league, it's a mix of young upcoming players and older veterans who have never had a shot, or bounced around the MLB/AAA level and looking for an opportunity. You also have guys who have had a cup of coffee in MLB after doing good in AAA, and failed and been downgraded back to the AAA level, where they usually perform well again. Those guys are considered AAAA players, not good enough for MLB, but too good for AAA.

Tennis is very similar, in that you have the high level ATP's (1000, 500, strong 250s), you have low level ATP's and challengers, and then you have futures. And it's similar in that you have guys who are either working their ways up, or are rediscovering lost form or coming back from injuries. Then you have guys who have made it to the ATP level but failed.

So, my question is, which players in recent memory are the most classic cases of AAAA players, too good for challengers, but not good enough for ATP events consistently?
Filo V. is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 09:52 PM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sleeping in the house of my latest jumpoff.
Posts: 34,908
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

BTW, I made this thread because of the things people have said about Grigor. That he's not good enough for the ATP level. I personally think that's ridiculous to state so early in his development, but it's something that others debate, so...............
Filo V. is offline  
post #3 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 09:54 PM
Registered User
 
out_here_grindin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cedar City,Utah
Posts: 11,874
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

A lot of Amricans can fit into this category. Kendrick,Young,Russell.

Paradorn Srichaphan
Kei Nishikori, Donald Young, Somdev Devvarman, Dustin Brown, Steve Johnson, Yannick Maden
Robert Farah, Clement Reix, Alexander Dolgopolov, Nathan Thompson


Follow college tennis here.. (I am the user Clemson_tennis)
out_here_grindin is online now  
post #4 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 09:55 PM
Registered User
 
Li Ching Yuen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Down Low.
Posts: 5,250
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Just look at the rankings and most guys that have their career highs for more than 2 seconds at around 80 are the correct answer.

Soeda is the perfect example of a good challenger level guy and a useless tour player.
Li Ching Yuen is offline  
post #5 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 09:56 PM
A happy person
 
Sonja1989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Loveland <3
Age: 26
Posts: 44,764
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Yeah, there are a few tournament what is 250s even so isn't too strong. But it's quite few. Sadly. I'm thinking about Bucharest or Casablanca.

Which players do you think anyway? Because I thing there are lot of player who isn't good enought in ATP level but Challenger tournament can he hard for them.

Never ever give up
Sonja1989 is offline  
post #6 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 09:58 PM
Registered User
 
Li Ching Yuen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Down Low.
Posts: 5,250
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonja1989 View Post

Which players do you think anyway? Because I thing there are lot of player who isn't good enought in ATP level but Challenger tournament can he hard for them.
Has anyone ever told you that you sound like Nadal sometimes?

I find it endearing.
Li Ching Yuen is offline  
post #7 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 09:58 PM
A happy person
 
Sonja1989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Loveland <3
Age: 26
Posts: 44,764
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
BTW, I made this thread because of the things people have said about Grigor. That he's not good enough for the ATP level. I personally think that's ridiculous to state so early in his development, but it's something that others debate, so...............
Well Grigor... he should improve yet but he is interesting one, because he plays much better in CH event. I think he has mental problem in ATP tournaments or I don't know. But something weird reason.

Never ever give up
Sonja1989 is offline  
post #8 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 09:59 PM
Registered User
 
Snowwy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: A place that's too cold.
Posts: 23,466
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Prodon is the equivalent but between futures and challengers

Peter Polansky
Nestor - Chvojka - Pospisil - Raonic - Peliwo
Snowwy is offline  
post #9 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 10:01 PM
Banned!
 
GlennMirnyi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: I'm in Porto Alegre, bitch!
Posts: 42,099
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Daniel, to some extent.
GlennMirnyi is offline  
post #10 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 10:03 PM
country flag JMG
Registered User
 
JMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24,839
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

If a player is too good for challengers, he won't be not good enough for the ATP level. That's not really possible.
JMG is offline  
post #11 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 10:03 PM
Registered User
 
sheva07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,783
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowwy View Post
Prodon is the equivalent but between futures and challengers
Or Middelkoop. Useless in challengers, but too good for futures.

Tsonga - Wawrinka - Del Potro - Gasquet - F.Lopez - Monfils - Haas - Janowicz - Youzhny - Tomic - Hewitt - Gulbis - Mahut - Haase - Schoorel - Sijsling - Huta Galung - De Bakker - Van der Duim - Westerhof - Middelkoop - Koolhof - Lootsma - S&T. Griekspoor - Sels - Van Rijthoven

All time: Safin - Schalken - Krajicek - Sluiter - Verkerk - Henman - Ivanisevic - Nalbandian - Ferrero - Philippoussis - Sampras - Siemerink - Blake - F.Gonzalez - Ancic - Haarhuis/Eltingh

Still supporting all the Dutchies despite their great choking skills
Looking forward to the Dutch Futures and Challengers this summer!
sheva07 is offline  
post #12 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 10:04 PM
Registered User
 
Renaud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,055
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowwy View Post
Prodon is the equivalent but between futures and challengers
Prodon won few Challengers including 3 during the last 12 months, so i don't think he fits into this definition. He is a good challenger player.

~♠ Lisnardaire(s) ~
un pour un, un pour un

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
"Je peux simplement vous dire que Jean-René Lisnard aime beaucoup les Chocapics" Benjamin Balleret
Renaud is offline  
post #13 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 10:05 PM
Registered User
 
LocoPorElTenis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,605
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Zeballos, Scwhank are prime examples.
LocoPorElTenis is offline  
post #14 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 10:05 PM
Registered User
 
Li Ching Yuen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Down Low.
Posts: 5,250
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMG View Post
If a player is too good for challengers, he won't be not good enough for the ATP level. That's not really possible.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_Soeda
Li Ching Yuen is offline  
post #15 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-18-2011, 10:09 PM
Registered User
 
Li Ching Yuen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Down Low.
Posts: 5,250
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

If you follow the challenger tour you'll see that the level of play is significantly slower than in the tour. Basically most consistent players have a lot to gain from collecting the remains in matches against guys that actually have weapons but are inconsistent or/and headcases.

Clay is clay, most challengers on clay are won by specialists, guys that have played their whole life on the surface.

And on the faster surfaces, big servers always win. In a way, the challenger tour is a bit of a mirror of the 90's when the range in playing styles from winner to winner of tournaments was drastically different.

It's pretty interesting.
Li Ching Yuen is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome