The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP level. - Page 6 - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #76 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 04:44 AM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sleeping in the house of my latest jumpoff.
Posts: 34,908
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Quote:
Originally Posted by hyperren View Post
It's tough being a Challenger-level player. I got to chat with a few folks over at the Singapore CH. Basically, most of these guys can't travel with a permanent coach... they simply don't earn enough to do so. So when you've got a bunch of players grinding it out on the Challenger Tour, they kinda stay on the same level if they don't get enough coaching, particularly during a tournament. Which I'm sure doesn't help when we're talking about AAAA-level players.
I 100% agree about this, if you get stuck at the challenger level for long enough, you're overall level gets dragged down to that of challengers because that's what you're used to playing against, you don't have the experience of playing better players with better balls, and that experience is needed to give an insight of what a players needs to improve to reach that level. And when you don't have the coaching there with you to keep your game improving from week to week, you stagnate. But again, the true top flight talents don't get stuck at the challenger level because they're just that much above it, it's basically a test, and some guys pass it and others fail.
Filo V. is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #77 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 04:51 AM
Registered User
 
wildemu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Age: 30
Posts: 7,713
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

What about the situation where a player is grinding out qualis for ATP 250's, 500's, etc but bombs out in the first round main draw most of the time? Is that valuable experience learned or should he be gaining confidence in challengers?

From what we have been describing it, challenger tour sounds like the twilight zone that only a select few can escape forever.
wildemu is offline  
post #78 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 04:52 AM
Registered User
 
hyperren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,635
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

I think if you succeed enough on the CH level, then you can possibly hire a coach who can travel with you and help you during tournaments, which ups your level, which helps the transition into higher level tournaments. But then you get CH level players (who don't have regular coaches) who'll probably fall to the same players (the upper tier CH players, who probably have coaches). Etc. etc.


HUEY/INGLOT FTW!
TEAM PHILIPPINES: ARCILLA. ALCANTARA. GONZALES. HUEY. PATROMBON.
DJOKOVIC. NADAL. DEL POTRO.
Garcia-Lopez. Monaco. Nieminen.

Berta. Dzumhur. Baluda. Fernandes.


FITD: Current: 42/178 (18.02.13). Peak: 23/178 (08.10.12).
Suicide Tennis: Current: 67/190 (17.03.13). Peak: 53/186 (08.10.12).
hyperren is offline  
post #79 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 04:56 AM
Registered User
 
hyperren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,635
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennisfan856 View Post
What about the situation where a player is grinding out qualis for ATP 250's, 500's, etc but bombs out in the first round main draw most of the time? Is that valuable experience learned or should he be gaining confidence in challengers?

From what we have been describing it, challenger tour sounds like the twilight zone that only a select few can escape forever.
Never mind the confidence; he probably won't be earning enough points if he keeps grinding through just to qualify at ATP-level events. Then he'd be forced back into the CH circuit anyway, to gain enough points to even make it to the qualies draw.


HUEY/INGLOT FTW!
TEAM PHILIPPINES: ARCILLA. ALCANTARA. GONZALES. HUEY. PATROMBON.
DJOKOVIC. NADAL. DEL POTRO.
Garcia-Lopez. Monaco. Nieminen.

Berta. Dzumhur. Baluda. Fernandes.


FITD: Current: 42/178 (18.02.13). Peak: 23/178 (08.10.12).
Suicide Tennis: Current: 67/190 (17.03.13). Peak: 53/186 (08.10.12).
hyperren is offline  
post #80 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 05:02 AM
A happy person
 
Sonja1989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Loveland <3
Age: 26
Posts: 44,764
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Quote:
Originally Posted by StatRacket View Post
Takao Suzuki

Challenger titles: 16 (more than any other player I think)
Career high ranking: 102

Never ever give up
Sonja1989 is offline  
post #81 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 06:53 AM
Registered User
 
feuselino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 807
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Wow, what is happening? We are already on page 6, and nobody has mentioned two certain players yet?! And people having an interesting, calm discussion? Is ist 2003 again?

Thanks for the enlightening read, everyone!

Release the Stanimal!!
feuselino is offline  
post #82 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 07:31 AM
Banned!
 
GlennMirnyi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: I'm in Porto Alegre, bitch!
Posts: 42,099
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I think that's pretty true, you can also say that the top players (basically the top 4 now) are just way better than everyone else, and that the field has not weakened but that everyone outside of the top 4 are close to equal in ability and Albert has improved.

But, he's not the only example. Melzer was right around .500 in his career before 2009. Soderling was below .500 outside of indoor events, and then by 2008 and especially 2009, he became a top 5-10 player. GGL, Verdasco, Simon, Monaco, are all guys who were long term average to below average and then they have now become top 30 players. Is it all their improving or the field weakening, I think a combination perhaps?
Field becoming weaker for sure.
GlennMirnyi is offline  
post #83 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 07:38 AM
Registered User
 
DanaKz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,330
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Ahem? And here we are calling Joburg, Moscow and Newport "freaking challengers"? If they are too good for CH, they must play ATP-250.

THERE IS NO SIGNATURE HERE.
DanaKz is offline  
post #84 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 08:02 AM
Registered User
 
Renaud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,055
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Quote:
Originally Posted by GlennMirnyi View Post
Field becoming weaker for sure.
Every era had late bloomers

~♠ Lisnardaire(s) ~
un pour un, un pour un

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
"Je peux simplement vous dire que Jean-René Lisnard aime beaucoup les Chocapics" Benjamin Balleret
Renaud is offline  
post #85 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 08:10 AM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,507
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Quote:
Originally Posted by Renaud View Post
Every era had late bloomers
Different game now mate. It's a lot more physical and with tennis being a speed endurance event, the physical peaks take a lot longer to hit, look at how the average age where players are having breakthroughs definitely more in the late 20s then previously.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
post #86 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 08:38 AM
Registered User
 
Renaud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,055
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Quote:
Originally Posted by Action Jackson View Post
Different game now mate. It's a lot more physical and with tennis being a speed endurance event, the physical peaks take a lot longer to hit, look at how the average age where players are having breakthroughs definitely more in the late 20s then previously.
I totally agree with that and i also think the density of the field is more impressive nowadays which make things harder for youngsters. I know most of people here desagree (or pretend desagreeing) with that and there is no reliable way to demonstrate this point.

~♠ Lisnardaire(s) ~
un pour un, un pour un

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
"Je peux simplement vous dire que Jean-René Lisnard aime beaucoup les Chocapics" Benjamin Balleret
Renaud is offline  
post #87 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 09:24 AM
Registered User
 
Li Ching Yuen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Down Low.
Posts: 5,250
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

The Tennis season is not too long.

I guessit depends on how good you are: if you are struggling and you are in between levels, winning challengers but can't catch a break on the tour then yes, maybe, since you have to play a whole lot of matches but for guys that are at a certain level where they can perform consistently (hell even if it's winning a match a losing the other) it's pretty ok.

Let's remember that, for example, for a top top player, there are at least 2 months that are 100% dead in the calendar: February and July. You don't have to play anything that happens in those months.

The Clay-season-Wimbledon run is perhaps the most exhausting but that's it, the rest of the season is 100% manageable.
Li Ching Yuen is offline  
post #88 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 09:54 AM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,507
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

The tennis season is too long, but that's going to impact differently depending on where they are on the food chain.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
post #89 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 11:01 AM
Registered User
 
AnnaK_4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,350
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

What about Dimitrov?
AnnaK_4ever is offline  
post #90 of 176 (permalink) Old 04-19-2011, 11:27 AM
Registered User
 
Li Ching Yuen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Down Low.
Posts: 5,250
                     
Re: The dilemma of being too good for challengers and not good enough at the ATP leve

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnnaK_4ever View Post
What about Dimitrov?
He can't be classified yet. He has had some decent wins at tour level quite awhile ago and in the challengers he has beaten the toughest competition at that level.

His results are reflective of his playing style. He relies a lot on groundies with not such a good movement and his serve needs a lot of work.

He needs some indoor faster courts to string some wins and then maybe we'll have a new Dimitrov.
Li Ching Yuen is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome