Yes you did. You say fed4ever is biased, then so are you. Truth is no one can objectively quantify the quality of an era. You can always put your own spin on things the way you want them to look like. You can say Sampras faced tougher competition and Federer fans can say he had tougher competition. But you're shit out of luck because you don't have any substantial way to prove your weak era business but 16 > 14 is pretty hard to disprove. Good luck with that.
I'm not biased.. I say it the way it is... Agassi from 92 or 93 on a threat EVERYWHERES. Nadal, either not around, just a pup on grass, and 0 SF hardcourt slam APPEARANCES as the main rival.. Agassi even though up and down was still more of a threat then that Nadal during that time period.. You can't dispute that at all.
Roddick>>> Goran on grass?? Don't make me laugh? Safin who shows up only in 2000 and 2005 to play slam tennis? Hewitt broken down after 2005.. Agassi geratric with a bad back showing how muggish the 00's is. Rafter in his prime more of a threat then A-MUG
People trying to say Pete plays old Edberg past his peak ( yet hes still #2 in the wold in the early 90s? Becker>>> ANY Roddick on grass. Baghaditis, Phillipousis, First time slam finals Gonzales are the equivalent of Pioline and others etc. I could go on.