Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great" - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 12:54 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
sexybeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,633
                     
Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

Sampras is confident about his chanses against this generation and why wouldnt he be confident? But to me he is opening his mouth a little bit too much here. Whats your take on this Sampras interview?


Mats Wilander recently stirred the pot when he inferred that, while on paper and in the record books, Roger Federer may be the best player of all time, the 16-time Slam champ hasn’t necessarily been challenged the way elite players of the past were. Said the Swede: “You have to say that the era when he played was the worst of all time. That’s why he was winning so much…His era had the worst Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5 we’ve had‚ the Nalbandians, Roddicks, Hewitts. That’s one of the reasons why Roger dominated so much…That’s the only way I can see it. How can you be that dominant in this day and age? It’s impossible.”

Hall of Famer Pete Sampras, who’s prepping for a Feb. 7 exo match against Frenchman Gael Monfils at the HP Pavilion in San Jose, Calif., concurs. To a point, that is.

“What’s happening to the game is that there’s only a handful of great players,” Sampras told Inside Tennis. “There’s a lot of really good players, but there’s only a number of guys who have won majors. In Mats’ generation, in my generation, there were a lot more major winners — Becker, Edberg, Stich, Courier, Agassi, you can go down the list. With Rafa and Roger being so dominating over the years, there’s not anyone else who really believes they can win majors. If it’s a Soderling or a Robredo, they’re really good players, but I’m not sure they believe.” (haha, if only Robredo believed he certanly would beat Federer and Nadal, what is Sampras smoking?)

“As to how dominant Roger has been, how great he’s been; the competition hasn’t necessarily been as great,” Sampras continued. “I’ve never seen two guys dominate as much as Roger and Rafa have. The competition is the competition — there’s nothing Roger can do about it. If he plays [fellow Swiss Stanislaus] Wawrinka like he did the other night [in the Australian Open quarterfinals], 1, 3 and 3 in an hour and 20 minutes, it’s not his fault. He’s that much better. Guys are pretty content now just getting to the quarters and are not believing in themselves as far as being able to beat Roger and Rafa. They’re clearly the best players in the world, but they’ve mentally got a really big edge on these guys.”

Sampras’ mid-’90s run of six years as the world No. 1 remains an unparalleled streak. That he pulled it off against the likes of nemesis Agassi, Becker, Courier, Chang, Kafelnikov, Rafter, Safin, Ivanisevic, Krajicek, etc., only makes it more remarkable.

“As far as styles of play, I felt in my day there were some players who were dangerous, who had big serves, who could serve you off the court,” Sampras explained. “I’d play one of those guys one day and the next day play a great returner, versus Roger, who never feels scared out there. He doesn’t feel like he’s under that much pressure. Everyone sort of plays the same; it’s just that Roger and Rafa are just better at it. They just move better. They’re better from the backcourt. It’s very clear to me that no major threat comes through like a Krajicek, an Ivanisevic, guys who could potentially blow you off the court with their serve. You have to admire what these guys have been able to do. It’s incredible. That’s the way I look at it. I don’t look at it like, ‘Wow, they’re not playing anybody.’ They’re playing the competition of their generation and they’re dominating. That’s enough for me.”

And how would an in-his-prime Pete Sampras fare against Federer and Nadal today?

“When you get the top guys from your generation, if it’s me or Andre or Becker, I was going to win my fair share of big ones, they were going to win their fair share of big ones. It’s hard to compare the decades. That said, I think we all would have been pretty even depending on the surface. I don’t think one guy would have been 10-1 against someone. It would be pretty even. My game would certainly hold up I believe in any generation, with the serve-and-volley game. Everyone talks about that game being extinct, but I still think it’s an effective way to play. It would have been exciting, and we all want to compare generations, what I’d do against Borg or McEnroe or Laver, for that matter. It’s hard to compare. The game has changed, technology has changed, but in my prime I felt unbeatable, as does Roger, as did Lendl, as did Laver. That’s the way we look at our decades. To say that one is better than the other? It’s hard to compare, but I felt I came out of a generation that was very, very strong, and I feel proud about that.”

With Nadal on the verge of owning all four major titles at once, Sampras said that while it wouldn’t be a calendar year Slam al la Laver (the last man to sweep all four majors in a single year), there would be no taking away from the accomplishment.

“If he does it, it’s incredible,” he said. “It’s one of the greatest achievements in all of sports in this day and age when the competition is a lot more fierce than it was back when Laver was doing it. It’s hard to believe, honestly, that he’s so close to doing it. He very well could do it. It’s mind-boggling to be that consistent, to win on all those surfaces in a day when the competition is very tough. You’ve got to put him right up there with Laver. Like I said, technically, it’s not January through the [U.S.] Open, but in my eyes he’s going to hold all four of them at one time. No one’s done that.”

(Sampras contradicts himself saying competition is very tough for Nadal on all surfaces, Sampras sounds like a Nadal fan)

Of course, Federer may just be the last man standing between the Spaniard and that seemingly superhuman feat. What advice would Pistol Pete give his big-dollars exo counterpart should the Swiss meet Nadal in the final?

“I’ve always felt playing lefties, Nadal especially…you have to use the whole court, you can’t get it just to his backhand. You have to go wide to Rafa’s forehand, open it up, get it to the backhand. That’s something Roger might try. He isn’t going to do it every game, but second serve, run around and smack forehands and chip and charge a little bit. What Roger doesn’t want to get involved in is long, grinding rallies that are tough to recover from that will take its toll over a five-set match. And Rafa can keep doing that. He has to take his chances, serve and volley occasionally, even on the second serve, because Rafa stands so far back. Just giving different looks. And I know that’s a little uncomfortable for Roger just to get out of that. But against Rafa, he’s forced to do some things that he doesn’t have to against other players. Rafa is that tough for him.”

And Federer will need to avoid being pinned down on his weaker side, his oft vulnerable one-handed backhand, by Nadal’s unrelenting, more-than-formidable forehand.

Easier said than done.

“It’s very tough. It’s what makes Rafa as great as he is,” Sampras concluded. “It’s tough to get control at that point. And once Rafa gets that ball to his backhand, it’s hard. I can tell you from one-handers, it’s the hardest shot in the game for us. What can you do? You’ve just got to try to get it back deep and wait for your forehand, and you can try to chip it, but it’s got to be a good chip. He’s returning Rafa’s serve and being pretty aggressive with it. Once you get one short ball, you have your track shoes on and he’s going to get it to your backhand…It’s an uphill battle once those points happen.”


http://www.insidetennis.com/2011/01/...ld-generation/

All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
sexybeast is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 12:58 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 16,071
                     
Re: Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

Yeah, Federer has been lucky not to have been stretched by titans like Washington, Bjorkman and Rusedski.

Sampras won all but 3 of his slams in 94-02, when most of the big names he mentions had faded hard.
philosophicalarf is offline  
post #3 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 12:58 AM
When You're On The Poster
 
Johnny Groove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Age: 26
Posts: 40,898
                     
Re: Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

Sampras giving this interview after he ripped the bong.

He does live in California after all.

What is with Sampras and Laver takin' shots at this generation?

Follow my Youtube Channel for all my matches
Follow me on IG for the latest news, vids, pics, and memes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novak Djokovic
Obviously, you play a lot of mind games with yourself, but it is important to always believe that you can play your best, perform your best, and in the end, your convictions are stronger than your doubts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
If I took the time to respond to every criticism that came across my desk, there would be no time for constructive work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humphrey Bogart
The only thing you owe the audience is a good performance
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niccolo Machiavelli
There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things.
Johnny Groove is offline  
post #4 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 12:59 AM
Anastasia Komananov, KGB
 
scoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 37
Posts: 53,509
                     
Re: Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

It's the same old debate, over and over.

Is there a lack of competition because the top 2 are just much better than the rest and better than the competition even in other eras, or were the dominant players in other eras just not as good so the competiton was comparatively stronger?

Or, if you dropped Federer and Nadal down in Sampras's era, would they still have 16 and 9 slams?

This is a question that can never be satisfactorily answered, everyone has an opinion, even Sampras. Some feel this is a weaker era and that's why Federer and Nadal are so dominant. Others feel that this is the best era of tennis competition ever and that Federer and Nadal are just THAT good that even if this best era ever they are still able to dominatetheir peers.
scoobs is offline  
post #5 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 01:01 AM
Faithful Txurigorri
 
Arkulari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Age: 31
Posts: 24,903
                     
Re: Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

Rafa >>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippoussis + Pioline + Martin + Ivanisevic + Moyá put together
And I'm not counting Hewitt, Safin, Kuerten...

Sampras came in the 90's when Becker/Edberg/Lendl were past their primes, Agassi was his main contender but the guy was not consistent enough to be a threat week in, week out.

The same competition he's criticizing, Hewitt and Safin was the competition that beat him at the USO two straight years when he was Roger's current age.

He and Wankander are such sore losers, they can't stand the fact that their records are being pulverized by someone.

Being a nostalgiatard is one of the saddest things, if you don't like this era then you shouldn't watch the sport

Rafael "The Matador of Spin" Nadal
Roger “The Magician of Precision” Federer
Del Potro, Ferrer, Haas, Zeballos


Arkulari is offline  
post #6 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 01:02 AM
Registered Fed fan
 
Kat_YYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 14,667
                     
Re: Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

jealous haters

Roger Federer * Greatest Of All Time
Kat_YYZ is offline  
post #7 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 01:02 AM
Banned!
 
GlennMirnyi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: I'm in Porto Alegre, bitch!
Posts: 42,099
                     
Re: Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

I like Sampras when he's candid.

I don't like him when he starts saying anything just to get press attention.

I abhor anyone who thinks Nadull has a "more-than-formidable" forehand. It's just a leftie moonball.
GlennMirnyi is offline  
post #8 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 01:03 AM
Registered User
 
ballbasher101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Age: 28
Posts: 4,893
                     
Re: Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

Sampras, I like you but you have no idea what u are talking about. Tennis is much more professional these days. Do us a favour and retire in peace. Federer has a better record than you, accept it and move on.
ballbasher101 is offline  
post #9 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 01:05 AM
Banned!
 
GlennMirnyi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: I'm in Porto Alegre, bitch!
Posts: 42,099
                     
Re: Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

Anyone saying Sampras competition was weaker than today is just making things up.
GlennMirnyi is offline  
post #10 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 01:09 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Age: 29
Posts: 72
                     
Re: Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

sampy is as stupid as people who thinks just cos other people were not allowed to win slams by the GOAT necessarily makes them suck. according to them if they were allowed to win slams then it would be a great era :retard:

Last edited by Snowwy; 01-27-2011 at 03:07 AM.
mgasol is offline  
post #11 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 01:11 AM
Banned!
 
GlennMirnyi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: I'm in Porto Alegre, bitch!
Posts: 42,099
                     
Re: Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgasol View Post
sampy is as stupid as people who thinks just cos other people were not allowed to win slams by the GOAT necessarily makes them suck. according to them if they were allowed to win slams then it would be a great era :retard:
Frauderer dominated clowns and mugs.

The first left-handed moonballer who showed up manhandled him in every freaking GS match they have played. Even in the matches Frauderer won, he was embarrassed at times.

Last edited by scoobs; 01-27-2011 at 03:14 AM.
GlennMirnyi is offline  
post #12 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 01:11 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Age: 37
Posts: 64
                     
Re: Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

The game evolves.. Players get better. Think about how many slams roddick would have if fed was not around? He would be considered a better player for sure. Federer and Nadal would crush the likes of pete's day. The game evolves and the players get better.
tennismaster1978 is offline  
post #13 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 01:11 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
sexybeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,633
                     
Re: Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

I really dont know what Sampras would have done with the Nadal forehand up his backhand, you cant slice it against Nadal so Sampras is right about the problems onehanders without incredible power (ala Gasquet, Wawrinka) face when playing Nadal. I think Sampras would still most often have won by sheer will power and great serve and volleying on grass and US hardcourt, all sets tiebreaks. Sampras was more clutch than Federer, that would have been the deciding factor.

All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
sexybeast is offline  
post #14 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 01:13 AM
When You're On The Poster
 
Johnny Groove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Age: 26
Posts: 40,898
                     
Re: Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

Sampras Slam Final opponents

Agassi- Win
Edberg- Lose
Courier- Win
Pioline- Win
Todd Martin- Win
Ivanisevic- Win
Agassi- Lose
Chang- Win
Moya- Win
Pioline- Win
Ivanievic- Win
Agassi- Win
Rafter- Win
Safin- Lose
Hewitt- Lose
Agassi- Win

Federer slam final opponents

Philippoussis- Win
Safin- Win
Roddick- Win
Hewitt- Win
Roddick- Win
Agassi- Win
Baghdatis- Win
Nadal- Lose
Nadal- Win
Roddick- Win
Gonzalez- Win
Nadal- Lose
Nadal- Win
Djokovic- Win
Nadal- Lose
Nadal- Lose
Murray- Win
Nadal- Lose
Soderling- Win
Roddick- Win
Del Potro- Lose
Murray- Win

Follow my Youtube Channel for all my matches
Follow me on IG for the latest news, vids, pics, and memes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novak Djokovic
Obviously, you play a lot of mind games with yourself, but it is important to always believe that you can play your best, perform your best, and in the end, your convictions are stronger than your doubts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
If I took the time to respond to every criticism that came across my desk, there would be no time for constructive work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humphrey Bogart
The only thing you owe the audience is a good performance
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niccolo Machiavelli
There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things.
Johnny Groove is offline  
post #15 of 88 (permalink) Old 01-27-2011, 01:13 AM
Registered User
 
ballbasher101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Age: 28
Posts: 4,893
                     
Re: Sampras interview "Roger's competition hasn't been as great"

Quote:
Originally Posted by GlennMirnyi View Post
Anyone saying Sampras competition was weaker than today is just making things up.
Almost all players these days can serve big. The level of fitness is better. The coaching is better. To turn around and say this generation is weak is just offensive. Agassi has gone on record as saying Federer is the best player he has ever faced and he has played a lot of the greats of the game. Seems as if Sampras fears that Nadal might even reach and surpass his 14 majors.
ballbasher101 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome