good point... agassi being GS relevant in 2005 also screams 'weak era' to some...
If it is 1 player & that player being an all-time great it doesn't change the senario that much.
Rosewall won the AO @ 37 years
Laver won the GS @ 30/31 years.
Connors won last slam USO @ 31 years played a high level till 34/35 years in 1987..(NO GS post 31)
Agassi won last slam @ AO 03 @ 32 years. High level 34 /35. 2005(No GS past 32 only 1 final since)
Both connors & agaasi had interuption/played @ a low level during their PRIME years.
In fact connors was better because he was overshadowed by borg/Mc enroe.
Agassi just didn't go deep in slams ,very inconsistent from 93-98.
The law of nature,only the strong survive.
THE GREAT TACTICAL RIVALRY OF THE OPEN ERA
FEDERER 10 VS TONI NADAL 20
ADVANTAGE TONI NADAL
RAPHEAL NADULL,A PRETTY FACE & MUSCLE
Fed 2 nadull 13 fed is nadull CLAY TURKEY. THE REAL ERA 2003-2010.