Isn't the point of the poll to discuss who will definitively not win a slam? I.e you'd bet your life on it.
Firstly, the poll includes slam finalists, so no. Secondly, if that really was the case, then the poll would only be about guys outside of the top 50 - and the thread would be even more pointless than it is now.
we're talking of the never-win-a-slam guys in a career. so, yes, Baggy, Ritchie, Sammy, they all qualify
As does Ty Dilello, myself, world #809 Oliver Marach... and Andy Murray
, seeing how these guys have never won a slam. [/discussion]