Why Isn't Gambill Selected for DC? - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-17-2002, 04:28 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Chloe le Bopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,276
                     
Question Why Isn't Gambill Selected for DC?

I don't even mean just for this tie - I mean ever.

I realize he's been selected in the past, and he certaintly isn't going to play singles over Roddick or Blake at the moment.

But surely he is every bit the doubles player that Todd is, and even more so than Mardy?

The guy won a doubles masters series title this year - did they even consider him?

Did he have a rift with the USTA?

I lack direction.

Chocking makes me sad.
Chloe le Bopper is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-17-2002, 04:32 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Chloe le Bopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,276
                     
Unless they are playing James-Todd in doubles...but I doubt they'd put that much stress on James

Even still, that doesn't explain Mardy over Jan Michael.

I lack direction.

Chocking makes me sad.
Chloe le Bopper is offline  
post #3 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-17-2002, 02:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 117
                     
They need Todd around for his experience and stablizer for the team. Besides the fact he is quite a good doubles player. He also has more experience and better record on clay than any of them. He can step in as a singles player or play doubles. Gambill is no where near the doubles player that Todd is. Todd is 8-3 for this year in doubles while Gambill is 21-16.

As for Fish over Gambill, Fish and Blake has already won a doubles match in DC this year, just as Blake and Todd has. Fish is better on clay than Gambill. Fish has a 13-10 record for doubles.

It probably didn't help that Pat Mc remembered the USA's dismal performance on clay against Spain in 2000. Gambill was a part of that team.
kalforpete is offline  
post #4 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-17-2002, 04:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 82
                     
Man, wouldn't it be cool if JMG played in the DC too? That'd just make my day... Todd Martin (as well as Pete in the next 2 years) is bound to be done with tennis soon so be sure that JMG will probably play one day soon! But now would be a great time, wouldn't it? Andy, James, Mardy, AND JMG? The new, hip, young, and next generation of American Men's tennis- NOW! LOL! That'd be so cool...
~Mindy

*ANDY RODDICK IS #1 BABY!*
"One day, I'm gonna hit that forehand down the line and everything is gonna come together"
roddicktennisbabe is offline  
post #5 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-17-2002, 05:45 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Chloe le Bopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,276
                     
Gambill has played doubles with a number of partners, and found success with a few, while a number didn't work out.

I wasn't suggesting he should play over Todd, I know why Todd is there.

I was suggesting he should play over Mardy, who still makes no sense to me.

Mardy has won a doubles match in DC< because he had the opportunity. Another time I didnt' understand why he was selected.

A 13-10 record, is no more impressive than 21-16.

Furthermore, Gambill won a Masters Series on clay this year in doubles. Where the hell was Patty mac?

I lack direction.

Chocking makes me sad.
Chloe le Bopper is offline  
post #6 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-17-2002, 07:15 PM
Registered User
 
the cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 4,625
                     
Good point Becca. But if Blake or Roddick pull up lame with an injury, you're going to have to have Martin or Fish play singles in their place in a best of five set match on clay!

The American team better win the doubles and hope for a split in singles, because Roddick and Blake are relatively inexperienced and they're up against it.

Egalite!
the cat is offline  
post #7 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-17-2002, 08:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 117
                     
Becca,

No, 13-10 isn't anymore impressive than 21-16. Neither one is that impressive but I think it all boils down to Fish is better on clay than Gambill.

Pat Mac was there when Gambill and Bhupathi won Hamburg. Pat Mac was also there when Fish/Roddick won Houston's doubles on clay. I think where the difference comes in is Fish has played much better on clay than Gambill. Seems like I remember Fish saying he liked playing on clay. Gambill doesn't.

As I said earlier, Pat Mac was also there when Gambill lost in DC on clay to Spain.

If I had to choose between Todd, Gambill and Fish, my choice would be Todd anyday in doubles or singles. After having watched both Gambill and Fish play, I'd be more inclined to go with Fish over Gambill, too.

Last edited by kalforpete; 09-17-2002 at 08:57 PM.
kalforpete is offline  
post #8 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-17-2002, 08:32 PM
Registered User
 
TheBoiledEgg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: in Woop Woop Land
Posts: 17,684
                     
Todd Martin might be 32 but he is 100 times better than Gambill on clay
TheBoiledEgg is offline  
post #9 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-17-2002, 09:13 PM
Registered User
 
AtPGiRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: safinland
Posts: 424
                     
Because Gambill SUCKS!!! lol!

Marat....Keep the Balance Baby!




Safinator.com
AtPGiRL is offline  
post #10 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-17-2002, 09:30 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Chloe le Bopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,276
                     
I should really stress this again, this isn't about WHY Todd was picked, it is about WHY Mardy was picked over Gambill.

And not just this tie.,..

What about the tie against Spain on grass? Why was Mardy picked over Jan Mike for that?

I am willing to accept the explanation that Mardy is more at home on clay than Jan Mike (though he hasn't proved anything on it either, has he?), but on grass?

This isn't an attack on Mardy by the way. It is just be confused about why someone appears to be getting the cold shoulder.

I lack direction.

Chocking makes me sad.
Chloe le Bopper is offline  
post #11 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-17-2002, 09:50 PM
Registered User
 
Gonzo Hates Me!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Age: 32
Posts: 3,591
                     
I personally think Gambill is not reliable and no where near as good as some of the other Americans: Roddick, Agassi, Blake...

With each passing season, I discover new reason
SAMPRAS --> Rios --> KUERTEN --> Kafelnikov -->
Federer --> Hewitt --> RODDICK --> GONZALEZ -->
NALBANDIAN --> Benneteau --> Davydenko --> Mathieu -->
TURSUNOV --> Mantilla --> KIEFER --> NADAL -->
Karlovic --> Odesnik --> Stepanek --> Monfils -->
??


Oliver Cromwell lay buried and dead. Hee-haw. Buried and dead.
Gonzo Hates Me! is offline  
post #12 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-17-2002, 09:57 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Chloe le Bopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,276
                     
I don't think that Gambill is as good as Agassi, Blake, or Roddick either.

But that doesn't explain getting shafted for Mardy, twice this year

I lack direction.

Chocking makes me sad.
Chloe le Bopper is offline  
post #13 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-17-2002, 11:47 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 117
                     
Becca,

I think, but am not sure without backtracking information, that Gambill was still having problems with his shoulder when Pat Mac picked the team in January for the first tie in February. That was when James Blake and Fish played partners. In the second tie against Spain, it was Todd and James that played doubles. I'm not even sure Fish was on the team the second time. If he was, it was as a hitting partner.

Last edited by kalforpete; 09-18-2002 at 01:28 AM.
kalforpete is offline  
post #14 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-18-2002, 12:06 AM
country flag Pea
Registered User
 
Pea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,938
                     
How about WHY the Bryans wasn't picked?!?!?!

GoOD luCk iN 2004:
{{{Alex Corretja}}}
{{{Roger Federer}}}
{{{Janko Tipsarevic}}}
{{{Andreas Vinciguerra}}}
{{{Mikhail Youzhny}}}
(Agustin Calleri)(Hicham Arazi)(Nicolas Kiefer)(Sebastien Grosjean)(Rafael Nadal)
(Tommy Robredo)(Xavier Malisse)(Gustavo Kuerten)(Rainer Schuettler)(Fernando Gonzalez)
(Mark Philippoussis)(Gaston Gaudio)(Albert Montanes)(Ivan Ljubicic)(Mariano Zabaleta) & Many More...

FoRevEr:
{{{STEFAN EDBERG}}}
Pea is offline  
post #15 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-18-2002, 02:47 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Chloe le Bopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,276
                     
kalforpete - thanks for all the info It makes a little more sense now

Pea - I think the Bryans aren't picked, because they aren't as strong as back up singles players as Todd would be.

I lack direction.

Chocking makes me sad.
Chloe le Bopper is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome