I know this thread is not 100 % serious, i'm gonna answer anyway. CYGS, not really, but he probably would have a slam by now. On a second thought, does he beat Roger in any of those finals with a better forehand? Not sure.
The scottish dolt does have a forehand. It just sucks balls.
WARNING: This signature may contain extreme traces of bullying and glory hunting TOMMY HASS 0 slams () and 0 finals 0 consecutive weeks at world no. 1 0 consecutive Laureus World Sports Awards 0 times qualified for YEC 2-13 H2H against motivated Federer 0-5 H2H against RAFA
Career low ranking: 1,241 (26.06.1995) 0 fake mullets flaunted in Roland Garros finals. 0 double bagels consumed against Raonic on grass 1 first name in common with Tommy Robredo
Location: Sleeping in the house of my latest jumpoff.
Re: What if Murray had a forehand?
Cool joke thread, good for laughs, but seriously, the answer is no anyway. Not the French, and not Wimbledon. And even with a forehand, his mentality and overall game plan isn't conducive to winning majors. Murray is a great player, but overrated in context to where his place in the game truly is.