So how can people argue that Federer is a better player, when Nadal has beaten him so many times? I mean even in the Sampras-Agassi rivalry sampras only beat Agassi 20-14 and everyone knows that Sampras was an overall better player but Nadal has won twice as much as Federer when they play each other!!!
Everyone knows Sampras was better because of his vastly superior achievements. When Nadal comes close to achieving what Federer has, then you may have an argument, until then, yours, and threads like yours will be pure rafatard circle-jerking.