Poll: Should GS draws be taken into consideration when comparing GOAT candidates? - MensTennisForums.com
View Poll Results: Should draws be taken into acount in comparing slam tallys, or is a slam a slam?
Yes, some players played much tougher opponenents in much tougher eras, it's only fair. 0 0%
Nope, a slam is a slam regardless. 4 80.00%
It's impossible to compare anything, especially with the surface homogenization. 1 20.00%
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll

LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 1 (permalink) Old 09-11-2010, 11:43 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
2003's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,501
Poll: Should GS draws be taken into consideration when comparing GOAT candidates?

I know this thread sounds like sour grapes, maybe is for all I know.

But, I know Federer didn't always beat the very best when he won his slams, and did take advantage of two occasions particulalry in 2009 when Nadal was absent, and maybe we will hear much more about those in the history books later.

But can anyone recal Federer, or anyone in recent history for that matter, that has had 3 such easy grand slam draws in a row, as Nadal has had in 2010? He has also been aided by quick semis on his part, and long semis for his eventual finalist.

I mean, regardless of seeding 1 or 2, Federer still came up against some tough guys in New York. He seemed to run into Djokovic regardless. I know it's not Nadals fault that the other seeds dropped out early, but it became a survival of the fittest in many ways. Federer was the far better of the two in New York in 2010 to have any hope of going into the final not being too tired. It's going to be a monumental task for Novak tomorrow.

I know it's not Nadals fault, he can't control that the other seeds don't win their matches.

But take 2010 FO. It turned out that it was Mahut who gave him the biggest test?!

Again in 2010 US Open, it could very well turn out that Garbagevilli in the first round would have been Rafas biggest test. I mean come on, save maybe 2010 AO, in these kind of circumstances, that just shouldn't happen.

I don't know. Im not saying it shouldn't apply to Federer too. I'm just saying that people will make such a huge deal of the 3 slams Nadal won in a row, if he wins US Open 2010. But to be honest, theyre not really worth 2 other slams in a row depending on how tough the draw is. It sounds harsh but I feel there is some truth to it.


Note, this is not a hater thread. Well done to Nadal, he deserves everything. But he has been very lucky here. Sure, Federer capitilised on Nadal being absent to win 2009 French Open. But he still had to play some very hot players, and back up a 5 set semi to win in straights in the final, vs the best player in the tournament up until that point.

"I did not play my best tennis, no? And..that is what enable him to win..to win this match no? "

- Rafael Nadal, ever so "humble", - press conference after shock 4 set loss to Robeen Soderling @ 2009 French Open 4th round.

Proud member of the Anti Dull Alliance
2003 is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome