Ha ha .. Fail .. He HAS won the most number of slams as well!
What's the point that you're trying to make ? The greatness of the record would diminish if he had lost most of those SF's ? Let's say it would. Did he lose most of those SF's ? No he did not. Therefore, the greatness of the record is not diminished.
I mean, what kind of twisted reasoning is this ? "The greatness would diminish if the accomplishments weren't as great"... BIG F*CKING DUH !
You may argue that his SF record PLUS
his results in those SFs and Fs, as a single achievement, is great. But I am referring to the greatness of the SF record ALONE
. Ignore his results in those SFs and Fs, does the SF record ALONE
still look as great as what it looks with the consideration of Roger's results in those SFs and Fs.