People forgetting nalbandian will win atleast 3 slams.
nalbandian will never win a slam.
it's preposterous to suggest he can still win one
You are the most biased poster I have seen on this board. Del Potro is in another class from Murray. He stepped up in his only grand slam final and won against Federer because of his aggressive, no fear game. What has Murray done in his finals to suggest he wins all these majors? Nothing. I think he could win 1 or 2 slams when his career is all said and done but let's not get carried away here..
murray faced jesusfed in both those finals, and he never had a chance.
had he been facing other players he would have 2 slams already.
federer isn't jesusfed anymore
therefore murray will have more chances on hardcourt slams and he'll take them.
If they're the future, tennis has lost a fan.
oh dear, one of the tens of millions of fans
uber negative and plain wishful thinking.......murray was ripped apart like a banana leaf just a couple weeks ago and del potro is still not back on the tour.......
he lost 6-4 7-6 6-4, and was up a break in the third.
is that what you call being ripped apart?
nadal is the one who has won 8 slams already and knows how to do it.......we are in the nadal era and they will have to fight like no other day to snatch even 1 slam from him in the next 1 year.......deal with it.......
nadal era? maybe for the next year or so, but we're entering a new era.
at his 14(not a proper teen yet)sapeod/daniel/dirthless/twiglight_vista a.k.a "i'm so stupid,ban me 12th time please" rides again.
i'm 15, not 14. and that isn't a proper teen? i do believe it's spelled fifteen
now are you gonna discuss the topic at hand, or just spew hatred towards me like you usually do?
Blah blah.. Nadal wasn't even playing well int he Wimb SF and it was still NID.
Glory, you so delusional.
i'm sorry, but you're even more delusional than i am. aren't you the poster that said serena williams would win against top 100 atp players?
that says it all
doesn't seem to say anything to me.
Little one, where are you getting this JesusDelPo on clay from? Has he even a final let alone a title on clay?
he has 2 titles on clay
his power will help him against anybody on clay.
only player that can really withstand his power is murray, but murray isn't good enough on clay.
nadal will find it hard to beat him on clay
Didn't you say something like this before he won Wimbledon?
i'm not sure.
i'm very confident he won't win any slams off clay every again though
Roger's gonna be winning his 17th.
of course, he'll win wimbledon next year, or maybe another one.
he has 2 slams left in him
sorry who is winning on grass if not Federer and Nadal?
after federer is not at slam winning level anymore, and nadal starts to decline as well, murray will take over on grass.
what do you find so funny?
again, what is so funny?
You've been saying this for the last 10 non clay slams
so i've been saying this since wimbledon 2007?
i joined here at the beginning of 2009.
I think Nadal is going to win AT LEAST one more HC slam, maybe not USO, but quite possibly AO. Australian Open is earlier in the season, and his knees won't bother him too much. He has already won one AO. He has the chance to win another IMO. He will quite possibly win two or three more RG's and maybe one or two more Wimbly's. That'll leave him with like 12-14 slams.
i don't think he'll win a hardcourt slam every again, or wimbledon either.
obviously he'll win some more at rg.
he'll end up with 10 slams, 2 more at rg.