Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-18-2010, 01:19 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 526
                     
Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

Hi. My articles are now published on two sites: The Bleacher report and an Australian website called the Big Tip

http://www.thebigtip.com.au/tennis/8...-win-wimbledon

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/4...-win-wimbledon

Hope you like the article: Read on.....

With Wimbledon fast approaching, it would be interesting to take a look at some of the best players who excelled at Wimbledon but never managed to lift the trophy in the last 30 years

.

Ivan Lendl

Ivan had a very good grass court record. He made it to two finals in 1986 and 1987, plus the semifinals in 1983, 1984, 1988, 1989, and 1990.



You won’t get a much better record than that. Plus, there have been players who have won Wimbledon with nowhere near as good an overall record of wins. Lendl lost in straight sets to a brilliant Boris Becker in 1986 and Pat Cash in 1987.

Lendl had many attributes to win Wimbledon, including a big serve plus athleticism, but the criticism was that he changed his game for the grass by serving and volleying when he should have played his natural game instead.

This critique is tough because back then everyone came to the net, and the grass courts weren’t as playable for baseline tennis as they are now.



Pat Rafter

Pat Rafter did not have his best results at Wimbledon until towards the end of his career.

A contemporary of Sampras and Ivanisevic , Rafter took to the grass courts from 1998 onwards—up until that point, Rafter was a hard court player due to the big kick serve and even bounce hard courts offered his game.

One can argue Rafter was unlucky; in 1999 he lost in the semifinal to an inspired Andre Agassi.

In 2000, Rafter played the best match of his career beating Agassi in five sets in the semifinal but came up against Sampras in the final. Even though Rafter won the first set in a tiebreak, Sampras was always threatening to run away with the match by persistently returning well, and he eventually did after turning around the second set tiebreak.

In 2001, Rafter came from behind twice to defeat Agassi in a five-set thriller in the semifinal and then played one of the best matches of the Open era against Ivanesivic in an amazing five set final with both players desperate to win after Sampras’ demise.

Both players deserved to win, but Goran came through 9-7 in the fifth to avoid being included in this discussion.

Rafter had all the physical and mental attributes to win Wimbledon but maybe just didn’t have the little bit of luck needed at the highest level to pull it off.



Andy Roddick

Perhaps I’m too quick to include Andy here because he’s still on the Tour and not yet 30 years old.

But you wonder if his last chance has gone after blowing the second set tiebreak last year against Federer in the final.

Roddick has been to three finals, each time losing to Roger Federer, so one can argue that he has been slightly unlucky.

However, I can also argue that out of everyone in this list, Roddick is the least talented and relies too much on his serve. He doesn’t possess the athleticism of the other players mentioned, and his return game is the least effective.

The media is always focused on the serve, but if you cannot return serve well, winning Wimbledon is impossible.

As Sampras has always said, it’s the return of serve that wins Wimbledon—otherwise we would see Karlovic and Rusesdki win Wimbledon were it just about the serve.

Roddick still has time so lets see what happens.



Tim Henman

Henman is an interesting choice because he never actually made a final. But he did make it to four semi finals from 1998 to 2002.

Henman had a lot going for him. He was very athletic, he had fanatical home support, and had a very nice return game.

His best chance came in 2001 when he had Ivanesivic on the rack in the third set, but the rain came and changed everything.

He also gave Sampras a good match in 1999, taking the first set, but Sampras’ experience proved too much in the end.

In my view the reason Henman never won Wimbledon was he simply did not have the power to go with his athleticism.

His serve wasn’t strong enough consistently, and he was never able to serve many aces or unreturnables, so he always had to work hard, and eventually that takes its toll against the best players—in other words, Henman wasn’t able to intimidate the opposition into mistakes.



Mark Phillippoussis

Mark made it to the final in 2003, losing to Roger Federer, who won his first Wimbledon.

Roger was the better player that day, and even though there were two tiebreaks, Roger’s return game made the difference.

Mark had many gifts—he was physically imposing and had one of the biggest and best serves in the game.

Unfortunately Mark had many injury issues, and the word is that he didn’t have the discipline to work hard enough on his game to get the best out of himself.

Therefore you can argue that Mark was a wasted talent—unfortunately for him.



Justine Henin

Like Roddick, Justine is still on the tour, having come out of retirement with the goal of trying to win Wimbledon.

Justine has been to two finals and one semifinal, losing to Venus Williams in three sets in 2001 and Amelie Mauresmo in three sets in 2006.

Justine has a beautiful game for grass, she’s athletic, and she's not afraid to attack the net or serve and volley. Plus Justine can use the slice to keep the ball low against the many two-handers out there on the backhand side.

What has prevented Henin winning Wimbledon up to now?

In my view Justine has the same issue as Henman. Her lack of power so far has made the difference and prevented her from being able to able to conquer Wimbledon.

Lets see what happens this year.



Arantxa Sanchez Vicario

Arantxa has a record similar to Lendl—finalist twice and semifinalist on a few occasions.



Arantxa faced Steffi Graf in 1995 and 1996. In 1995, Arantxa gave everything, but there was an incredible ninth game in the third set which lasted almost 25 minutes, andSteffi was bale to eventually break and serve out for the title. In 1996 Steffi was always in control.

Arantxa was a crafty and intelligent player who was tactically aware. She won the French Open three times and the US Open once, beating Graf in a great final in 1994.

But again, at Wimbledon, Arantxa just lacked the power and athleticism of her rivals, including Graf, Novotna, and Navratilova.



I would like to finish the article with a few honourable mentions who had the game to win Wimbledon and managed to win after coming so close on many occasions.



Honorable Mentions (winners)

Goran Ivanesivic, Jana Novotna, and Amelie Mauresmo.

Last edited by laurie-1; 06-18-2010 at 07:38 PM.
laurie-1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-18-2010, 02:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 578
                     
Re: Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by laurie-1 View Post
Hi. My articles are now published on two sites: The Bleacher report and an Australian website called the Big Tip

http://www.thebigtip.com.au/tennis/8...-win-wimbledon

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/4...-win-wimbledon

Hope you like the article: Read on.....

With Wimbledon fast approaching, it would be interesting to take a look at some of the best players who excelled at Wimbledon, but never managed to lift the trophy in the last 30 years.

Ivan Lendl – Ivan had a very good grass court record. He made it to two finals in 1985 and 1986 plus semi finals in 1983, 1984, 1988, 1989 and 1990. You won’t get a much better record than that plus there have been players who have won Wimbledon with nowhere near as good an overall record of wins. Lendl lost in straight sets to a brilliant Boris Becker in 1986 and Pat Cash in 1987.

Lendl had many attributes to win Wimbledon including a big serve and athleticism but the criticism was that he changed his game for the grass by serving and volleying and should have played his natural game instead. Tough because back then everyone came to the net and the grass courts weren’t as playable for baseline Tennis as they are now.


Pat Rafter – Pat Rafter did not have his best results at Wimbledon until towards the end of his career. A contemporary of Sampras and Ivanesivic, Rafter took to the grass courts from 1998 onwards – up until that point, Rafter was a hard court player due to the big kick serve and even bounce hard courts offered his game.

One can argue Rafter was unlucky; in 1999 he lost in the semi final to an inspired Andre Agassi. In 2000 Rafter played the best match of his career beating Agassi in 5 sets in the semi final but came up against Sampras in the final. Even though Rafter won the 1st set on a tiebreak, Sampras was always threatening to run away with the match with persistent good returning, which he eventually did after turning around the 2nd set tiebreak.

In 2001, Rafter came from behind twice to defeat Agassi in a 5 set thriller in the semi final and then played one of the best matches of the Open era against Ivanesivic in an amazing 5 set final with both players desparate to win after Sampras’ demise. Both players deserved to win but Goran came through 9-7 in the 5th to avoid been included in this discussion!

Rafter had all the physical and mental attributes to win Wimbledon but maybe just didn’t have the little bit of luck needed at the highest level to pull it off.

Andy Roddick – Perhaps I’m too quick to include Andy here because he’s still on the Tour and not yet 30 years old. But you wonder if his last chance has gone after blowing the 2nd set tiebreak last year against Federer in the final. Roddick has been to three finals, each time losing to Roger Federer so one can argue that he has been slightly unlucky.

However, I can also argue that out of everyone in this list, Roddick is the least talented and relies too much on his serve. He doesn’t possess the athleticism of the other players mentioned, and his return game is the least effective. The media is always focused on the serve but if you cannot return serve well, winning Wimbledon is impossible.

As Sampras has always said, it’s the return of serve that wins Wimbledon – otherwise we would see Karlovic and Rusedski win Wimbledon if it was just about the serve.

Roddick still has time so lets see what happens.


Tim Henman – Henman is an interesting choice because he never actually made a final. But he did make it to four semi finals from 1998 to 2002.

Henman had a lot going for him. He was very athletic, he had fanatical home support and had a very nice return game. His best chance came in 2001 when he had Ivanesivic on the rack in the 3rd set but the rain came and changed everything. He also gave Sampras a good match in 1999, taking the 1st set but Sampras’ experience proved too much in the end.

In my view the reason Henman never won Wimbledon was he simply did not have the power to go with his athleticism. His serve wasn’t strong enough consistently, he was never able to serve many aces or unreturnables, so he always had to work hard, and eventually that takes its toll against the best players – in other words, Henman wasn’t able to intimidate the opposition into mistakes.

Mark Philippoussis – Mark made it to the final in 2003, losing to Roger Federer who won his first Wimbledon. Roger was the better player that day, and even though there were two tiebreaks, Roger’s return game made the difference.

Mark had many gifts, he was physically imposing and had one of the biggest and best serves in the game. Unfortunately Mark had many injury issues, and the word is that he didn’t have the discipline to work hard enough on his game to get the best out of himself. Therefore you can argue that Mark was a wasted talent – unfortunately for him.


Justine Henin – Like Roddick, Justine is still on the tour, having come out of retirement with the goal of trying to win Wimbledon. Justine has been to two finals and one semi final, losing to Venus Williams in 3 sets in 2001 and Amelie Mauresmo in 3 sets in 2006.

Justine has a beautiful game for grass, she’s athletic and not afraid to attack the net or serve and volley. Plus Justine can use the slice to keep the ball low against the many two handers out there on the backhand side. What has prevented Henin winning Wimbledon up to now? In my view Justine has the same issue as Henman, her lack of power so far has made the difference and prevented her from being able to able to conquer Wimbledon.

Lets see what happens this year.

Arantxa Sanchez Vicario – Arantxa has a record similar to Lendl, finalist twice and semifinalist on a few occasions. Arantxa faced Steffi Graf in 1995 and 1996. In 1995 Arantxa gave everything but there was an incredible 9th game in the 3rd set which last almost 25 minutes, Steffi was bale to eventually break and serve out for the title. In 1996 Steffi was always in control.

Arantxa was a crafty and intelligent player who was tactically aware. She won the French Open 3 times and the US Open beating Graf in a great final in 1994. But again, at Wimbledon, Arantxa just lacked the power and athleticism of her rivals including Graf, Novotna and Navratilova.

I would like to finish the article with a few honourable mentions who had the game to win Wimbledon and managed to win after coming so close on many occasions. They are Goran Ivanesivic, Jana Novotna and Amelie Mauresmo.
Sabatini without a doubt should be up there. Gaby even has more SF (3-1) showings at Wimbledon than Sanchez Vicario, and was just 2 points away from winning it in 1991 in the final..

I would not certainly include Philipoussis, the guy just reached past the QF round at Wimbledon just once. That would be similar to saying that Nalbandian should have a Wimbledon title by now. Hmm. Mark had the serve and power, he really lacked the physical atheticism to win at Wimbledon. He got to two slam finals though, probably i can understand why you choose him.

Nice work btw, great job!

A service notice for Pete..

Little FEDERER, Roger (SUI) Versus Defending Wimbledon Champ Pete SAMPRAS (USA)
Year Tournament Round Surface Winner Score
2001 Wimbledon 16 Grass (O) R.FEDERER 7-6(7) 5-7 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5


Does he really believes this is the same Federer of then?

Last edited by spencercarlos; 06-18-2010 at 02:12 PM.
spencercarlos is offline  
post #3 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-18-2010, 02:25 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 526
                     
Re: Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

Spencer

Sabatini is a good choice.

I must admit I didn't think of Nalbandian because he got to the final in 2002 but never did anything at Wimbledon after that.

David should have done better everywhere than he has done, a pity but he still has time to make something happen.
laurie-1 is offline  
post #4 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-18-2010, 03:05 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 578
                     
Re: Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by laurie-1 View Post
Spencer

Sabatini is a good choice.

I must admit I didn't think of Nalbandian because he got to the final in 2002 but never did anything at Wimbledon after that.

David should have done better everywhere than he has done, a pity but he still has time to make something happen.
Actually Nalbandian reached QFs in 2005, much better than Mark´s post RU result at Wimledon. I choosed Nalbandian because he has a similar record to Mark.. 1 RU 3QFs to 1 RU 1QFs.

Sure David still has time it seems but at the same time, the clock is ticking we´ll see. I hope he wins any slam.

A service notice for Pete..

Little FEDERER, Roger (SUI) Versus Defending Wimbledon Champ Pete SAMPRAS (USA)
Year Tournament Round Surface Winner Score
2001 Wimbledon 16 Grass (O) R.FEDERER 7-6(7) 5-7 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5


Does he really believes this is the same Federer of then?
spencercarlos is offline  
post #5 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-19-2010, 03:45 AM
Registered User
 
Mimi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 22,045
                     
Re: Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

henin is not lack of power

Rafa! Rafa! Rafa!

Epic movies, like brokeback mountain, are seldom found in the industry or worthy for the mainstream viewer. As often as I have watched the clips of this movie, I always find something more to it. For one, the gay stuff doesn't enter the picture for me, only the dimension of the highest love I have ever witnessed in life or on film.
Mimi is offline  
post #6 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-19-2010, 04:05 AM
Registered User
 
allpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,264
                     
Re: Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

Lendl - too bad he played on '80s grass and balls.

Rafter - too bad he played during the Sampras era.

Roddick - too bad he played during the Fed era.

Henman, Scud - too bad they played during the Sampras AND Fed era

What is the real game?
It is a game in which the heart is entertained,
the game in which you are entertained.
It is the game you will win.

MAHARAJI
allpro is offline  
post #7 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-19-2010, 09:40 AM
Registered User
 
Certinfy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,867
                     
Re: Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

Great article

Berdych | Murray | Tsonga | Monfils | Raonic | Soderling
Certinfy is offline  
post #8 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-19-2010, 09:42 AM
Registered User
 
flip_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 32
Posts: 1,249
                     
Re: Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by spencercarlos View Post
Actually Nalbandian reached QFs in 2005, much better than Mark´s post RU result at Wimledon. I choosed Nalbandian because he has a similar record to Mark.. 1 RU 3QFs to 1 RU 1QFs.

Sure David still has time it seems but at the same time, the clock is ticking we´ll see. I hope he wins any slam.
I think you need to consider Mark prior success to 2003 at Wimbledon, not post 2003 because that's when he was healthy and active on tour.

2003 - Final
2002 - 4th rd
{knee surgery}
2000 - QF (andre)
1999 - QF (pete).. retired hurt
1998 - QF (pete)

I think overall Mark's results are substantially better then Nalbandian's at Wimbledon.

Mark Philippoussis news follow: twitter.com/flipfocus
flip_fan is offline  
post #9 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-19-2010, 12:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,866
                     
Re: Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Certinfy View Post
Great article
Well, they forgot Rosewall who reached 2 finals before age 21 and 2 more after age 33. For 11 years before 33, he was banned from playing Slams because he was a Pro. He was a great grass court player, as he won 4 Aussie and 2 US championships on grass many years apart.
thrust is offline  
post #10 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-19-2010, 07:40 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 526
                     
Re: Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by thrust View Post
Well, they forgot Rosewall who reached 2 finals before age 21 and 2 more after age 33. For 11 years before 33, he was banned from playing Slams because he was a Pro. He was a great grass court player, as he won 4 Aussie and 2 US championships on grass many years apart.
I didn't forget Rosewall but the article clearly states from the last 30 years.
laurie-1 is offline  
post #11 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-19-2010, 07:45 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 526
                     
Re: Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by mimi View Post
henin is not lack of power
Precisely the opposite. A consistent lack of power due to her physical frame has so far prevented Henin wining Wimbledon. Grass is different to clay and Henin's serve is not big enough to win cheap points easily to conserve her energy for the big players in the later rounds. Henin admitted herself in interviews that she's intimidated by the power of Venus Williams on grass. Hard courts and clay courts are more of a leveller for her.

Its not a case of rolling your eyes, it's a case of explaining why you think Henin has the power on grasscourts.
laurie-1 is offline  
post #12 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-20-2010, 10:39 AM
Registered User
 
Sean.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 396
                     
Re: Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by laurie-1 View Post
Precisely the opposite. A consistent lack of power due to her physical frame has so far prevented Henin wining Wimbledon. Grass is different to clay and Henin's serve is not big enough to win cheap points easily to conserve her energy for the big players in the later rounds. Henin admitted herself in interviews that she's intimidated by the power of Venus Williams on grass. Hard courts and clay courts are more of a leveller for her.

Its not a case of rolling your eyes, it's a case of explaining why you think Henin has the power on grasscourts.
Because she's one of the few WTA players with the ability to hit 90+ mph ground strokes, her serve's never going to be consistent but she does get cheap points of it.

Watch her match against Sharapova at YEC 07, Justine overpowered her.

Andy Murray * Richard Gasquet * Fernando Gonzalez
Grigor Dimitrov * Andrey Kuznetsov
Sean. is offline  
post #13 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-20-2010, 11:53 AM
Registered User
 
LeChuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,081
                     
Re: Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

With Justine, it's not that she can't generate power. It's that she's requires a considerable amount of effort and has to put her body under a lot of strain generate it, unlike the likes of Venus, Serena, Sharapova etc who can generate it more easily/naturally.

She has a very diminutive frame, not just height-wise but with her very thin and slender build, compared to the likes of Clijsters and Kuznetsova etc who aren't that much taller than her but have much bigger builds. Even players like Cibulkova and the recently retired Sugiyama who are shorter than her have bigger builds.
LeChuck is offline  
post #14 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-20-2010, 12:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,310
                     
Re: Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

Roddick's unarguably the best grass courter never to win one, at least in the modern era, anybody who says otherwise is an hater. Plus he's got the most finals out of those who haven't won it.
Obviously Lendl's the best player not to win one, but he wasn't a grass court specialist.
Selby is offline  
post #15 of 24 (permalink) Old 06-20-2010, 12:35 PM
Registered User
 
oranges's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 13,564
                     
Re: Article - A look at the Best players never to win Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Selby View Post
Roddick's unarguably the best grass courter never to win one, at least in the modern era, anybody who says otherwise is an hater.
Obviously Lendl's the best player not to win one, but he wasn't a grass court specialist.
Ahead of Rafter, I don't think so.
oranges is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome