Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion - MensTennisForums.com
Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 03:45 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
FairWeatherFan's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 970
Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

I believe that Rafael Nadal is very probably the most fortunate champion in the history of tennis. The conditions in which the sport has been played through the period of Nadal’s career have largely conspired to inflate his achievements to a level which he would not have attained had he been playing in an earlier era - the 90s, for instance. There are really four conditions that I would say constitute Nadal’s good fortune.

The first is the overall slowing down of the tennis surfaces, and the slowing of Wimbledon in particular. It has been well-publicised that in response to the ‘ace-fests’ of the 1990s, tennis administrators have seen it as necessary to slow down the surfaces generally in an attempt to make the sport more ‘watchable’. As a result, the previous lightning-quick surfaces that were seen in the 1990s such as carpet and fast grasscourts, have all but disappeared. It is of course patent that Nadal’s game-style is much more suited to slower surfaces and this overall slowing of the game has hence worked in his favour.

The most striking example of this is of course Nadal’s victory at Wimbledon, a tournament which has traditionally been dominated by serve-volleyers but in recent years has become to be dominated by baseline players. Certainly baseline players have won Wimbledon in the past – Agassi, Borg and Hewitt being the primary examples. However, when Borg and Agassi won Wimbledon, they both serve-volleyed a very high proportion on their first serves, taking them outside of their traditional game-style. Lendl completely altered his game to a serve-volley style during Wimbledon in an ultimately failed attempt to win the tournament. These players’ efforts should be contrasted to that of Nadal. Because of the slow condition of the grasscourts in this era, it was not necessary for Nadal to adopt serve-volley or other elements of traditional grasscourt strategy to any great extent in order to win the tournament. Nor did he need to face any great serve-volley players in his path to winning Wimbledon. The great majority of players Nadal has faced at Wimbledon play to his strengths – that is, engaging with him in baseline rallies, as the conditions at the tournament render attacking the net an unsound option.

Some people would raise Hewitt in rebuttal to this point, saying that he too did not adopt a serve-volley style in order to win Wimbledon. This is of course true, but Hewitt grew up on grasscourts and utilises a flat-ball counterpunching style, a style much more suited to the fast courts at Wimbledon than Nadal’s game-style. Moreover, the 2002 Wimbledon was an anomaly for many other reasons aside from Hewitt’s victory.

Some might argue that if Wimbledon has been slowed down, then Roland Garros has been sped up, and this has worked against Nadal. This is of course a valid argument. My response to it is, yes, Roland Garros may have sped up, but the competition on clay is nevertheless so slight, that this has really not had much of an impact upon Nadal’s utter domination of the surface.

This lack of competition on clay is really the second condition in today’s tennis environment that has led to the inflation of Nadal’s achievements. This issue has been canvassed in-depth recently on this board, so I don’t want to beat a dead horse so to speak by going too in-depth in discussion. Suffice to say, myself, and many other people, are of the opinion that the current level of play on clay is of a significantly lower standard than that which has been seen in previous eras of the sport. The tactical standard displayed by today’s players on clay is significantly less than, for instance, the greats of the 90s and early 00s – the quality of Muster, Kuerten, Bruguera, Mantilla, and even Courier is not seen anymore, except of course, in Nadal himself. He is undoubtedly the only player on clay today who measures up to those greats of years past. No one can deny that Nadal is indeed a superb clay-court player, and would undoubtedly have won Roland Garros in any era. However the title of ‘GOAT on clay’ which has been foisted on him by some has been attained by inflation of his achievements resulting from an overall lack of quality on the surface from his competitors.

The third condition which I would believe has contributed to Nadal’s being the most fortunate champion in tennis history is racquet technology. Nadal, more than any other player, has benefitted from the increases in racquet power that are now present in recent years. Take, for example, players such as Federer, Hewitt and Murray. All these players are so technically sound that it would be possible for them to still play with probably some degree of success with a wooden racquet. It would, on the other hand, be almost impossible for anyone to hit Nadal’s forehand, his most lethal shot, with a wooden racquet, and the effectiveness of his counterpunching game, relying as it does on his hitting powerful strokes from deep behind the baseline, would of course be significantly reduced. Of course, we do not know what game-style Nadal would have developed with less modern equipment. Nevertheless, we can say that his current game-style is largely dependent upon newer racquet technology – more so, undoubtedly, than the majority of modern-day tennis players. I’m not saying that this is illegitimate or wrong – all sports are of course dependent on technology. Nevertheless, it is a condition which has contributed to Nadal’s success.

And the final piece of good fortune running through Nadal’s career is that, time and time again, he has been able to meet Roger Federer in the finals of grand slam tournaments. It might be argued that it is silly to suggest that meeting the supposed GOAT in the finals of grand slams is good luck. However, even the most casual of tennis fans should be able to recognise that tennis is essentially a game of match-ups, and that Nadal is a bad match-up for Federer. Playing Federer in 7/8 of his grand slam finals has, quite simply, been a piece of good fortune for Nadal. He has only had to play one other player in all the many grand slam finals he has reached, a highly unlikely statistic in tennis history. Indeed, it is worth noting that Mariano Puerta – Nadal’s only other opponent in a grand slam final – tested Nadal more in that Roland Garros final than Federer ever did Nadal in any of their own French Open finals.

Now, one rebuttal which I have seen raised to such arguments as the above is, ‘Why do you only attribute this supposed good fortune to Nadal and not Federer?’ For example, I have often seen people argue, ‘Federer won most of his Wimbledons on “slow grass”, so why is that not lucky for him?’
I will say, firstly, that to some extent Federer has been fortunate as well. In particular, I think it unlikely that Federer would have won Roland Garros in the 1990s with the level of competition on clay back then. However, the other conditions mentioned above certainly do not operate in Federer’s favour. Federer, an attacking player with a game well-suited to traditional grasscourts, would likely prefer Wimbledon to be faster than it is now. Indeed, in 2003 he proved that he can win the tournament whilst serve-volleying on his first serve. His game would likely increase in effectiveness on a faster court. Of course, he would have to contend with other players playing better at the net, but would be less threatened by ‘slower-court’ players such as Nadal. Moreover, Federer would prefer Roland Garros to be slower. His success at Hamburg in the past evidences that slow clay is more suitable for his game.

Another rebuttal that might be made is that Nadal has been unlucky, particularly with injuries. However, I would refute such an argument out of hand. Obviously, there are different kinds of injuries – some caused by bad luck, some by lack of fitness, and some simply by an unsustainable game-style. Nadal’s injuries are clearly an example of the latter. They should not be classed as unfortunate.

I do not mean this post to suggest that Nadal is not a superb tennis player. Of course he is – after all, you can only play in the conditions which you are given. However, his achievements have undoubtedly been largely inflated by the fortunate conditions in which he has played. There have been other striking examples of good fortune for legendary players in tennis history – for example, Agassi’s draw in the 1999 French Open. However, never before have so many factors conspired together to produce great achievements as has happened in the case of Nadal. Out of all the many great players in along whom he will stand in tennis history, he is, for me, “The Accidental Champion”. And I hope that some discerning tennis fans will indeed recognise him as such.
FairWeatherFan is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 04:08 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 44
Posts: 2,443
Re: Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

r2473 is offline  
post #3 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 04:09 AM
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,563
Re: Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

1. Homogenization of the surfaces has benefitted Nadal but so it has beneffitted other players so what gives...

2- Disagree completely with that point. People are always saying here that we're having a weak grass era or a weak clay era and I never buy it as it is most often than not an idealization of the past. People like Mantilla, Moyá and Ferrero were good back in their prime days but they were certainly not that good as people around here would like you to believe.

3- Probably so but what gives? Everyone has benefitted from racquet technology so the question you're posing is one of degrees.

4- Would Nadal have less titles if he hadn't faced Federer in so many finals? It's really imposible to say... Maybe he would have more.
andy neyer is offline  
post #4 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 04:20 AM
Registered User
DJ Soup's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,049
Re: Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

a very well presented topic. I salute you for that.
DJ Soup is offline  
post #5 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 05:47 AM
Registered User
Forehander's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,645
Re: Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

Nicely written

The BIGGEST (borderline delusional) fan of players on General Message Board according to Forehander:
Grigor Dimitrov: FedererBulgaria
Borna Coric: Crowdmaker
Nick Krygios: Dan.
Tommy Haas: Leng Jai
Sebastien Grosjean: Myself
Novak Djokovic: Chiico (Leader of the No1e Cult)
Forehander is offline  
post #6 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 06:08 AM
Faithful Txurigorri
Arkulari's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2008
Age: 32
Posts: 24,903
Re: Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

I might not agree with what's written, but you present a very sound and respectful point in here

Rafael "The Matador of Spin" Nadal
Roger “The Magician of Precision” Federer
Del Potro, Ferrer, Haas, Zeballos

Arkulari is offline  
post #7 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 06:45 AM
Registered User
tennizen's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 27,276
Re: Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

The OP and the responders

“For life be, after all, only a waitin' for somethin' else than what we're doin'; and death be all that we can rightly depend on.” - Bram Stoker, Dracula
tennizen is offline  
post #8 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 06:48 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 34
Posts: 1,562
Re: Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

Next thread should be Roger Federer: The Accidental GOAT. lol
Topspin Forehand is offline  
post #9 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 06:51 AM
Registered User
acionescu's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: junk store
Posts: 56,000
Re: Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

Can't wait to read the appreciation posts of madmax, piggygotroasted and djokovicgonzalez
acionescu is offline  
post #10 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 07:00 AM
Registered User
CyBorg's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,166
Re: Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

There's nothing accidental about Nadal's achievements. This thread sucks.

'This isn't right. This isn't even wrong'.
- Wolfgang Pauli upon seeing a paper by a young physicist

'A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand.'
- Bertrand Russell
CyBorg is offline  
post #11 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 07:17 AM
country flag n8
n8's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 33
Posts: 7,545
Re: Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

Nicely written FairWeatherFan. I have actually thought the same (basic point that Nadal has been fortunate) for a couple of years. However, I'd be careful using the word 'accidental'.

Originally Posted by n8 View Post
I think Kokkinakis will be the most successful player born in the 90s.
n8 is offline  
post #12 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 07:44 AM
Registered User
jazar's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: On Her Majesty's Secret Service
Age: 29
Posts: 7,354
Re: Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

for once someone making a coherent argument
jazar is offline  
post #13 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 08:06 AM
Mais Oui
-Valhalla-'s Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Asgard
Posts: 778
Re: Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

A highly biased and long-winded premise full of distortions. Marginalizing Nadal’s accomplishments [or 'Mugboar' as you like to call him] and then positing that he’s somehow lucky to be in the same era as Federer [the most dominant player the game has ever witnessed], is truly bizarre. This is a classic case of twisting facts to fit one’s own hypothesis/agenda and the mental gymnastics necessary to write a piece like this must truly be breathtaking.

Originally Posted by FairWeatherFan View Post
Out of all the many great players in along whom he will stand in tennis history, he is, for me, “The Accidental Champion”. And I hope that some discerning tennis fans will indeed recognise him as such.
Pompous, pretentious bullshit of the highest order.

.. ..

"He who endures, conquers."
- Persius
-Valhalla- is offline  
post #14 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 08:20 AM
Registered User
Just like heaven's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,586
Re: Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

Originally Posted by -Valhalla- View Post
Pompous, pretentious bullshit of the highest order.
So true.
Just like heaven is offline  
post #15 of 115 (permalink) Old 04-25-2010, 08:32 AM
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 17,155
Re: Rafael Nadal: The Accidental Champion

Utter bullshit from "I" to "." One must be a total idiot to sit down and write such a piece of stinky crap.
JolánGagó is offline  
Closed Thread

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome