Do all players find this, that if they do well at Roland Garros they will do well at Wimbledon? Seemed to work for Agassi and Nadal. 99 Agassi won Roland Garros and then looked brilliant at Wimbledon. Nadal, same thing for 3 years in a row.
Also, I heard Hingis and Agassi both say that the longer they played on grass the worse their groundstrokes became.
look at Mauresmo and Henin.Yes Mauresmo might have never won Roland Garros due to choking but she was a fine clay court player having won Rome in 2005;2004 and was a finalist there in 2003;2001;2000.Won Berlin in 2004;2001 and 2000 and was a finalist in 1998 and won Warsaw;Nice;Amelia Island amongst other clay court tournaments beating the likes of Williams;Capriati etcLshrug: she might not have done well in Paris but she always did well at Wimbledon by making 3 semis before winning it in 2006
Henin made it to 2 finals and 3 semis so I agree that clay makes you a finer grass court player but Del Potro and Davydenko are worthless on grass
and maybe it's not fair to compare the WTA and ATP