For those who think ATP has a problem... - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 05:13 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Vera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: We'll build it, they'll come. 2010
Posts: 3,580
                     
For those who think ATP has a problem...

If you haven't read this yet, here's from CNNSI Jon Wertheim's column:
---------------------------------------------------------------

What's up with the media criticizing men's tennis? It seems like every day there was a new story bashing the guys. Then I would turn on my television and the men's matches would be great!
—S. Fairchild, Dallas

A number of writers ought to be saying mea culpas and sending their apologies to the ATP Tour about now. The Williams story is an unbelievable modern-day fairy tale that, as far as I'm concerned, still hasn't gotten its due. But let's face it: Ultimately, the men's matches carried the Open. Neither the men's game nor the ATP are immune from faultfinding. The merits of the Champions Race, the debacle that was the ISL deal, the failure of unquestionably talented players like Marat Safin and Roger Federer to step up -- those issues are fair game for criticism.

But it's unfortunate when writers and columnists who are clearly watching the sport for the first time all year swoop into New York for a day and write a lazy piece about how lame the men's game has become. A particularly untenable column that ran in a newspaper of record opined: "Most of the top men on the tour are faceless. Costa, Cañas, Ferrero and Moya sounds like a law firm in Spain, but they are four of the top six money-winners this year. Ever heard of them? Stop fibbing. Unless you watch tennis regularly, and most sports fans do not, you couldn't identify them if they cranked one of their 125-mile-an-hour serves over your head." Huh? The implication that the players are faceless because they have foreign names is offensive. And anyone who thinks Juan Carlos Ferrero or Albert Costa is serving 125 mph is clearly out of his depth talking authoritatively about the sport.

A dead giveaway, incidentally, for one of these hit-and-run jobs is some mention of the length of the points. "The men's game," a fellow scrivener told us last week, "is just serve, ace, serve, ace." Really? Where was he when Andy Roddick finished off Alex Corretja with a 43-stroke match point? When, time and again, men's matches exceeded three hours? When Hewitt, a counterpuncher who doesn't weigh 150 pounds, was becoming No. 1? When, for that matter, Sampras and Agassi ran each other around in a final that went nearly three hours?
Vera is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 05:18 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Vera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: We'll build it, they'll come. 2010
Posts: 3,580
                     
Okay, I do think that we here are all diehard tennis fans, which are far more knowledgable than those faceless sports writers and columnist.

And I'm a little too excitd seeing this, because that's what we've been talking here for the past few days.

Last edited by Vera; 09-10-2002 at 05:25 AM.
Vera is offline  
post #3 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 05:38 AM
Registered User
 
Chloe le Bopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,276
                     
I noticed this as well, I'm glad someone pointed it out

Of course there are two sides, and I expect someone will provide us with a rebuttle

But for once he hit *some* things right on the head.

I lack direction.

Chocking makes me sad.
Chloe le Bopper is offline  
post #4 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 05:50 AM
Registered User
 
Tennis Fool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not on the court, obviously.
Age: 42
Posts: 8,752
                     
the failure of unquestionably talented players like Marat Safin and Roger Federer to step up -- those issues are fair game for criticism.

Hmmm. Things I've been saying all along...


Weirthem also said this yesterday:


I think in general, it would have been nice in a different way had Andy Roddick been in the final. But to sort of send these guys off, in the oldest U.S. Open final, for them to show they can still hang in their 30s, they've been playing each other for 20 years -- it's not just two veterans. This was really special. At the same time, had the final been Roddick-Hewitt, I'm not sure we would have complained.

He was surprised (as we were all) that Pete resurged. Notice how he says its a great "send-off" for Pete, and how he mentions Roddick twice!

I guess what I'm saying, Vera, is that I agree with Weirthem about particular problems with the New Ballz...
Tennis Fool is offline  
post #5 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 05:50 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Vera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: We'll build it, they'll come. 2010
Posts: 3,580
                     
Ya, it didn't really answer all doubts ppl have. But with all those threads here seemingly bashing ATP and the New Ball, I thought it's worth a try. And I've posted so many comments in different thread saying why it's important to promote NEW BALL even if they are still just up-and-coming and not there yet, Or that tennis is still very excited, with those high quality rally. And the best part of all, I totally agree when he said "The implication that the players are faceless because they have foreign names is offensive". Damn right. And it's surprising how often that these ppl can't get the foreign players' name right.
Vera is offline  
post #6 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 05:53 AM
Registered User
 
Chloe le Bopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,276
                     
It is appalling how often they get names wrong

I couldn't beleive it at Roland Garros when two new players - Albert Corretja and Alex Costa hit the scene

I lack direction.

Chocking makes me sad.
Chloe le Bopper is offline  
post #7 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 05:56 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Vera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: We'll build it, they'll come. 2010
Posts: 3,580
                     
Ya, it pissed me right off in Cincy when JC got into the semi and the article they posted on ATP called him Ferriera. Until some fan wrote in to ask them to change it.
Vera is offline  
post #8 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 06:00 AM
Registered User
 
Ada Monroe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cold Mountain
Posts: 326
                     
I agree with Tennis Fool, the problems are not the usual whinings, but what is taking so long for the next generation to arrive.

"If you are marching, stop marching. If you are fighting, stop fighting..."
Ada Monroe is offline  
post #9 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 06:03 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Vera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: We'll build it, they'll come. 2010
Posts: 3,580
                     
BTW, TF, I posted this not to shut you up. Just thought it's an interesting article. Besides, you agreed with Jon for particular points that you like. I agree with him the big picture, that"Ultimately, the men's matches carried the Open" despite all those criticisms which may or may not have merit.
Vera is offline  
post #10 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 06:15 AM
Registered User
 
Tennis Fool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not on the court, obviously.
Age: 42
Posts: 8,752
                     
Vera,

Jon is saying the men's matches were better, more thrilling, AND also that New Ballz have been disappointment.

I saw only part of one thrilling match, Hewitt-Blake. (It was only getting good when I had to leave the house. I put on my VCR but it messed up! I came back to realize Blake had taken a set. I was really, really upset).

Though I hear those early round matches were thrilling, who lost? Marat, Federer, Guga, Haas.

I saw those supposed "thrilling" semi-finals, and I have to say I didn't think they were thrilling at all. In fact, very disappointing. Especially, Hewitt, who I didn't think served great and looked very flat.
Tennis Fool is offline  
post #11 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 07:00 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Vera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: We'll build it, they'll come. 2010
Posts: 3,580
                     
Jon said Safin and Roger, not necessarily the whole New Ballz group.

Safin lost to Guga after winning the previous match in 4.5 hours. He looked a little fatigue. Guga and Haas were recovering from injury and suffering injury respectively. And Roger, no idea why he lost these days.

I'm sure you will accuse me of giving them excuses. And I'm just sorry that these tennis players are not supermen, as much as I wish they are.

I saw Hewitt's match, he seems a bit out of sort. But I saw that he still played some remarkable defensive tennis, may not be pretty but it's surely effective.

Well, I think we can't agree on this issue because I'm just too positive. Preferring to give these players benefit of a doubt by not judging them based on one tournament. And you are so negative about men's tennis that you just refuse to see there's any good in it.
Vera is offline  
post #12 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 07:06 AM
Registered User
 
Tennis Fool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not on the court, obviously.
Age: 42
Posts: 8,752
                     
Vera,

If I'm negative it's because I'm a dishearted fan. If I didn't care anything about the sport, I wouldn't waste my time here.

But, just my beliefs.
Tennis Fool is offline  
post #13 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 07:07 AM
Registered User
 
Tennis Fool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not on the court, obviously.
Age: 42
Posts: 8,752
                     
But, thanks for trying to sway me to the light. Thanks for the Wertheim post.
Tennis Fool is offline  
post #14 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 07:15 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Vera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: We'll build it, they'll come. 2010
Posts: 3,580
                     
Any time!
Vera is offline  
post #15 of 21 (permalink) Old 09-10-2002, 07:59 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 326
                     
I don't know if this helps the discussion or not. Frankly I don't know what to make of it.


Time for a new rivalry


Sampras and Agassi have dominated the men's game



By Dan Warren
BBC Sport Online



Pete Sampras' triumph over Andre Agassi in the US Open has forced the record book writers, once again, to rewrite their tomes.

Yet, while the American's 14th Grand Slam title is the highlight of a glorious Indian Summer to his career, the golden era of Sampras and Agassi is coming to an end.


Sampras: Victory was "best ever"
These two great rivals have dominated the men's game during the past decade, but who among the next generation will be filling their shoes?


Head to head:
Sampras v Agassi
Wins:
Sampras 20
Agassi 14

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Career titles:
Sampras 64
Agassi 53

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Grand Slam wins:
Sampras 14
Agassi 7

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prize money:
Sampras $43m
Agassi $25m
Lleyton Hewitt, who became the youngest-ever world number one towards the end of 2001, is widely tipped as the next player to dominate the men's game.

Just 21, the Australian has already won 16 titles and his Wimbledon triumph in June was his second Grand Slam win.

He has been labelled by Sampras as "the future of tennis", although his game bears more resemblance to Agassi's.

Not a huge server, his unerring - and unnerving - accuracy saw him sweep aside allcomers at Wimbledon, dropping just two sets along the way.

It would seem the only person who can prevent Hewitt enjoying a lengthy spell at the top is himself - despite his passion on court, his love of the sport remains curiously lukewarm.

He has admitted he would sometimes rather be playing Aussie rules football than tennis.


Who will challenge Lleyton Hewitt in the future?


He needs a true rival to force him to improve - in the same way as John McEnroe needed Bjorn Borg to reach his best.

Russia's Marat Safin seems the most natural opponent.

His big-serving, powerful game contrasts with Hewitt's in a similar way to how Sampras' differed from Agassi.

In head-to-head encounters, both players have three wins, yet Safin is notoriously inconsistent, seemingly plagued by even more inner demons than the Australian.

Still, aged just 22, time is very much on the Russian's side - not a luxury which Britain's Tim Henman enjoys.

Henman, 28, has consistently failed to beat the very best in the sport.


Players' ages upon winning their last Grand Slam
Bjorn Borg - 25
John McEnroe - 25
Stefan Edberg - 26
Boris Becker - 28
Andre Agassi - 30
Jimmy Connors - 31
Pete Sampras - 31
He has only beaten Pete Sampras once in their seven meetings, at the ATP Masters Series event in Cincinnati.

And it is cruel for Henman that as Sampras' powers began to fade, in came Hewitt - who has a 100% record against the Briton in their six meetings.

Perhaps a bigger threat to Hewitt's dominance comes from the clay court specialists.

Gustavo Kuerten is moving towards fitness after a lengthy lay-off and will be always be a threat on clay.

Hewitt has, however, beaten Kuerten in their one and only meeting on the surface - although the Australian has never progressed beyond the quarter-finals at Roland Garros.

Albert Costa, this year's French Open champion, is another clay-courter who could trouble the Aussie.

But Costa is now 27, and Kuerten approaching 26 - so neither are likely to be able to sustain their challenge at the top for the next decade.

Maybe the new breed of American stars, Andy Roddick and James Blake, will prove the biggest rivals to Hewitt in years to come.

Both are young and have plenty of promise, although neither has quite managed to impact on the world stage as of yet.


Pistol Pete v A-Rod
Indeed, the way in which the old master Sampras knocked over young pretender Roddick in straight sets in the US Open suggests the upstarts might still have to play second fiddle for a while yet.

Arwen and Aragorn
Eowyn and Faramir
Eomer

Marat, Lleyton, Marcelo, Yevgeni, Serena, Anna k., Venus, Martina H. So they say you're arrogant, tell em to kiss your ***.

So they say you can't control your temper, so what?

So they say you're rude, keep laughing as you win titles

To all the bad boys and bad girls keep on keeping on and screw everyone else.
luvbadboys is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome