Originally Posted by Action Jackson
Wilander 3-0 in the Slams over Becker.
Wilander won Slams on 4 surfaces, something Becker never did.
yes I know your arguments
(for the slams 2 of them were in Roland-Garros with the best Wilander on his best surface against a Becker who was less than 20 : in these conditions anybody but Lendl would have been beaten)
Becker (7-3 against Wilander) also beat Wilander 3 times in the Masters Cup, twice in Davis Cup and once in a "Masters Series" final (Cincinatti).
I don't really think that the H2H is a good argument in favour of Wilander
Fortunately statistics don't say all
My opinion is Becker (even if I think Edberg had a better carreer than Becker, to please Action_Jackson
, Wilander is different)
And if Roland-Garros had been as complicated as the Australian Open in that time, no doubt that Becker would have won it
I will not say anything more in this thread.