What do you expect, a title like: "Nadal thinks that Djokovic is a better player on clay at this moment because he beat Federer on Rome and he won Belgrade and reached the finals at MC & Rome"?
Well, I'd like to think that members of this forum would be sensible enough to discern relevant comments from irrelevant comments (in which case this thread would cease to exist) -- utopianism, I know.
Are you talking about your threads on Middle East?
My thread (singular, not plural) has generated more discussion than any thread you've created. I'd be willing to bet that. Not that your standards are particularly high, after all, you're appealing to the lowest common denominator of this forum: prepubescent children. We've all done it, but don't get defensive when someone with a rudimentary comprehension of the Spanish language is able to spot your theatrics.
Thanx for posting your opinion
Djokovic made the finals of Rome and Monte Carlo, not to mention his stunning SF performance against Nadal in Madrid; on the other hand, Roger's first final of the clay court season came in Madrid. Based on these facts, I don't think it's a matter of opinion: Djokovic's results, on clay, have been hitherto superior to those of Federer.