Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 08:00 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 373
                     
Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay
Spaniard, however, may eventually surpass Swede as best-ever on dirt




OPINION
By Bud Collins

NBC Sports


Bud Collins


PARIS – I sat dazzled today by the amazing display that Rafael Nadal put on before a packed stadium at Roland Garros to win his fourth consecutive French Open title. The Spaniard, ranked No. 2 in the world and seeded second here, was brilliant beyond words and so dominant that world No. 1 Roger Federer could only win four games in a lopsided straight-set defeat, 6-1, 6-3, 6-0 that took under two hours to complete.


For Nadal it was a history-making Sunday as he became the second man to win four consecutive French Open titles. Bjorn Borg, who was on hand to watch today’s final, won four in a row in 1978-81. Nadal raged through this Paris fortnight, a young superstar on a mission, not dropping a set and losing only 41 games in seven rounds while extending the perfection of his career match record at Roland Garros to an astounding 28-0.


Borg is unsurpassed at this major, having won the ultimate test on dirt six times (he won consecutive titles in 1974-75 to precede his run of four straight to close out the ‘70s and begin the ‘80s).


And it is Borg who remains at the head of the class of clay-court artists – even in light of all that we are seeing from Nadal. My belief on that could eventually change since Nadal, who just turned 22, would seem on track -- unless something goes terribly wrong with his career -- to overtake Borg as the all-time clay-court master. Nadal winning seven or more French Opens does not seem out of reach by any means – but until he does, Borg stays as my King of Clay.


Certainly Borg’s accomplishments on the red dirt of Roland Garros stand alone, but there have been some other illustrious clay-court players worth including in the discussion of the best-ever players on the surface. One of those is Nadal’s Spanish compatriot Manuel Santana, who won the French Open twice (1961 and 1964). And there was the great Italian clay-court artist Nicola Pietrangeli, who won consecutive titles in 1959 and 1960. And Guillermo Vilas, who won here in 1977, was -- like Nadal -- a great southpaw on clay although Nadal is quicker on the court than Vilas though I suspect the Argentine was probably stronger than the Spaniard.


But none of the three aforementioned clay-court superstars was better than Nadal. No it’s just Borg that Nadal must surpass on dirt. Borg, the all-time cream of the clay-court crop, who rose to the highest of heights on the surface has for so long seemed to have his supremacy on the surface beyond the reach of anyone. But that began to change the first time Nadal stepped foot on a court at Roland Garros. And no one understands better than the Spaniard – as humble as he has been in interviews geared around his mastery on clay – that to eventually be anointed King Rafa of the Clay he must reduce what Borg achieved on the surface to second best.


What is most impressive about Nadal is that he is a far better player than he was last year. He’s serving better and if it’s possible, he’s moving better as he covers the court. The thing which helps Nadal look so good on clay against Federer is he is always there – meaning he is always in place to have a shot at hitting the ball, which takes away one of Federer’s strengths, which is keeping the ball away from his opponents. And like most players, Federer just cannot handle the immense spin that Nadal puts on his shots.


If you look at the stats from this latest Paris collision of the two best players in the world – this was the third straight year they have met in the French Open final --


Federer was only able to win five of 24 points when his second serve went in, and 26-of-53 points on his first-serve. He made 35 unforced errors to seven for Nadal and only won 18-of-42 points at the net. Federer faced at least one break point in all but one of his 11 service games.


In case fans are wondering, the last time Federer lost a set at love was in 1999 at the Queen’s Club tournament on grass -- he fell to Zimbabwean Byron Black 6-3, 6-0 in the first round.


The only worse final I recall at Roland Garros was in 1977 when Vilas defeated Brian Gottfried 6-0, 6-3, 6-0, but it’s hard not to notice that Gottfried wasn’t the top player in the world as Federer has been for so long.


Nadal is just marvelous and I don’t see how Federer can be called the greatest player of all time if he can’t beat Nadal on a clay court. Nadal improved his overall winning record over Federer to 11-6. In their 10 clay-court meetings, Federer has won only once in the Hamburg final last year. And instead of looking better in this third consecutive Paris title-match against Nadal -- the last two of which both went to four sets -- Federer looked as if he was lost with no answers.


While it’s hard to deny that today was all about Nadal and deservedly so, a few words about Federer must be written. I keep looking back to the third-round match at the Australian Open in January when Janko Tipsarevic tested all of Federer’s patience before the world No. 1 barely came through but then went on to lose to eventual champion Novak Djokovic in the semifinals. I’ve felt that since that Tipsarevic match Federer is just not the same player and it’s possible that maybe he never will be.


It is probably premature to write but it could be that we’re seeing the end of Federer’s reign at the top. I’m thinking that Pete Sampras might be feeling a little safer with his all-time record of 14 majors won after today since Federer is still two majors behind equaling that record. I know a few months ago that Sampras said he thought that Federer would go way ahead of him, but I’m not so sure that is all that certain now.


One question that is always brought up when discussing Nadal is whether he can win at any of the other majors. I believe he can and his best shot is at Wimbledon. He can win Wimbledon and should’ve won Wimbledon last year. He has a tough time at the U.S. Open because over the course of the year he takes a lot out of himself when he plays so by the time Flushing Meadows comes around in late August he’s worn out. But if Nadal sets his mind to winning the U.S. Open he can tinker with his schedule and work it out to where he can be fresh and ready to contest for the title in New York. As for the Australian Open, maybe it takes place too early in the year for Nadal to be at his best since he just hasn’t shown much Down Under, although I think his game should translate well to the Aussie hardcourt surface.



Nadal can back up his French Open win with a title at Wimbledon in just a few weeks time. And I also believe that one day in the future, maybe sooner than most think, Nadal will take from Federer the No. 1 ranking. Bottom line: If you’re Nadal, the best is yet to come!

© 2008 NBC Sports
WhataQT is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 08:39 AM
Registered User
 
Knightmace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,544
                     
Re: Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

Big ups to Nadal, he is equally Borg imo, but only on clay.
Knightmace is offline  
post #3 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 09:10 AM
Registered User
 
BlueSwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 41
Posts: 2,243
                     
Re: Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhataQT View Post
Nadal is just marvelous and I don’t see how Federer can be called the greatest player of all time if he can’t beat Nadal on a clay court.
Now that is just nonsense. If Nadal is the greatest clay courter of all time, which I believe that he is, why should the greatest allround tennis player of all time be expected to beat him on clay (which, BTW, he has done, in Hamburg last year)??

I mean, who else is in contention for the title of GOAT? Pete Sampras whose clay court results are dismal for a player of his status? Bjorn Borg, who never won the US Open (or the Australian Open) and whom Federer has already superceded in terms of number of Grand Slams won as well as in most other statistical terms?

Certainly, the fact that Federer can't defeat the greatest clay courter of all time at Roland Garros, in absolutely no way threatens his claim to the title of the GOAT.
BlueSwan is offline  
post #4 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 09:49 AM
Registered User
 
Tnn74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,110
                     
Re: Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

^^ Okay, calm down... this article was, after all, written by Bud Collins
One thing he is correct though... Rafa is indeed the greatest clay courter ever

:: Rafael Nadal ::
World Number 1!


>>PHENOMENADAL.COM
-Rafael Nadal Fansite! A Fresh Look.


-Still Slammin' for SAFIN. Forever.

Ferrero . Robredo . Nalbandian

I don't like Federer or Djokovic.
Tnn74 is offline  
post #5 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 09:50 AM
Registered User
 
avocadoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,591
                     
Re: Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

basically, this is good news for Roger, as BC is overwhelmingly wrong in his predictions
avocadoe is offline  
post #6 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 09:52 AM
RAJ KAREGA KHALSA
 
Bibberz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9,975
                     
Re: Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueSwan View Post
Now that is just nonsense. If Nadal is the greatest clay courter of all time, which I believe that he is, why should the greatest allround tennis player of all time be expected to beat him on clay (which, BTW, he has done, in Hamburg last year)??

I mean, who else is in contention for the title of GOAT? Pete Sampras whose clay court results are dismal for a player of his status? Bjorn Borg, who never won the US Open (or the Australian Open) and whom Federer has already superceded in terms of number of Grand Slams won as well as in most other statistical terms?

Certainly, the fact that Federer can't defeat the greatest clay courter of all time at Roland Garros, in absolutely no way threatens his claim to the title of the GOAT.
I agree. If we're waiting for a GOAT who is the GOAT on all surfaces, we're never going to crown anyone.
Bibberz is offline  
post #7 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 10:45 AM
Registered User
 
Kolya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Munich
Posts: 11,324
                     
Re: Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

He's equal to Borg on clay. But never in greatness.

Robin Bo Carl Söderling
Kolya is offline  
post #8 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 11:12 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,091
                     
Re: Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bachelor Dandy View Post
I agree. If we're waiting for a GOAT who is the GOAT on all surfaces, we're never going to crown anyone.
I think the best way to explain why Federer is seen as the best player ever is to put things in quality/quantity perspective. A player can overcome all before him in purely way of quantity - striking the ball harder, being more consistent etc. but not introducing anything new quality-wise. With Federer, he didn't bring anything bigger quantity-wise in the game - and even nothing completely new quality-wise for that matter - but, he in a way compiled into a harmonic whole everything that was done before him and with a personal stamp and style of his own. He looks like a final stage of evolution of decades of the game - in the way on which he plays and he looks.
Younger players like Nadal and Djokovic are bringing new things only quantity-wise - they are stronger, more consistent etc. but they don't bring anything new to the game on they way on which Federer did, or some other ex-champs like Borg in their's time.

Grand Slam Season as of 2008:

Australian Open
Roland Garros
JOKE SLAM
U.S. Open


Right word in the right moment - a glass of watter in the desert.
DDrago2 is offline  
post #9 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 11:22 AM
Registered User
 
Forehander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,424
                     
Re: Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

Quote:
Originally Posted by DDrago2 View Post
I think the best way to explain why Federer is seen as the best player ever is to put things in quality/quantity perspective. A player can overcome all before him in purely way of quantity - striking the ball harder, being more consistent etc. but not introducing anything new quality-wise. With Federer, he didn't bring anything bigger quantity-wise in the game - and even nothing completely new quality-wise for that matter - but, he in a way compiled into a harmonic whole everything that was done before him and with a personal stamp and style of his own. He looks like a final stage of evolution of decades of the game - in the way on which he plays and he looks.
Younger players like Nadal and Djokovic are bringing new things only quantity-wise - they are stronger, more consistent etc. but they don't bring anything new to the game on they way on which Federer did, or some other ex-champs like Borg in their's time.
wow this is good post

The BIGGEST (borderline delusional) fan of players on General Message Board according to Forehander:
Grigor Dimitrov: FedererBulgaria
Borna Coric: Crowdmaker
Nick Krygios: Dan.
Tommy Haas: Leng Jai
Sebastien Grosjean: Myself
Novak Djokovic: Chiico (Leader of the No1e Cult)
Forehander is offline  
post #10 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 11:37 AM
Registered User
 
Bazooka's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,414
                     
Re: Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

Nadal has been more dominant than Borg in the clay tournaments, he never won 81 matches in a row. He's the recordman in Montecarlo, Rome and Barcelona. Also Borg failed to win the USO on clay, I would like to see what Nadal would do there...

Talking strictly about RG, Borg is still a little above Nadal. It's true that he has 6 titles, but Nadal is undefeated, never played a 5th set, and has defeated the number 1 in three finals in a row. Also, by just winning his first round match next year, he will make a new 29-0 record in the tournament.

So for me, Nadal has equaled or slightly surpassed Borg in clay.

Just talking about clay, you know, in general tennis there's no doubt who's greatest.

Nadal career prediction: 6 RG, 2 Wimbledon, 1 Australian Open, 1 US Open, 2 Master Cup, 20 Master Series, 65 titles.
(Predicted before RG 2008 when he had 3xRG)
--------
Quote:
The inhabitants of the Balearic Islands are said to have been the inventors of slings, and to have managed them with surprising dexterity, owing to the manner of bringing up their children. The children were not allowed to have their food by their mothers till they had first struck it with their sling.
~Vegetius, De Re Militari, late 4th century
Nadal: the last Balearic Slinger, the ultimate product of natural selection. Feel the weight of the centuries in the Topspin from Hell!
Bazooka is offline  
post #11 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 12:09 PM
Registered User
 
gebl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 347
                     
Re: Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazooka View Post
Nadal has been more dominant than Borg in the clay tournaments, he never won 81 matches in a row. He's the recordman in Montecarlo, Rome and Barcelona. Also Borg failed to win the USO on clay, I would like to see what Nadal would do there...

Talking strictly about RG, Borg is still a little above Nadal. It's true that he has 6 titles, but Nadal is undefeated, never played a 5th set, and has defeated the number 1 in three finals in a row. Also, by just winning his first round match next year, he will make a new 29-0 record in the tournament.

So for me, Nadal has equaled or slightly surpassed Borg in clay.

Just talking about clay, you know, in general tennis there's no doubt who's greatest.
yes.

as usual, Bud Collins misjudges matters.

for the reasons in the quote above, Nadal has already pulled ahead of Borg on clay.

also, Federer can already be reasonably expected to be labelled the GOAT without needing to beat Nadal at RG.

thank you Bud for confirming (by putting forward the opposite) the above.

NOTWITHSTANDING!


(Promote a Preposition)
gebl is offline  
post #12 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 12:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,712
                     
Re: Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueSwan View Post
Now that is just nonsense. If Nadal is the greatest clay courter of all time, which I believe that he is, why should the greatest allround tennis player of all time be expected to beat him on clay (which, BTW, he has done, in Hamburg last year)??

I mean, who else is in contention for the title of GOAT? Pete Sampras whose clay court results are dismal for a player of his status? Bjorn Borg, who never won the US Open (or the Australian Open) and whom Federer has already superceded in terms of number of Grand Slams won as well as in most other statistical terms?

Certainly, the fact that Federer can't defeat the greatest clay courter of all time at Roland Garros, in absolutely no way threatens his claim to the title of the GOAT.
Glad to know that I"m not the only one who has thought this repeatedly over the last 2 or so years. I felt like I was taking crazy pills.
Beforehand is offline  
post #13 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 01:16 PM
Registered User
 
Bazooka's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,414
                     
Re: Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

Quote:
Originally Posted by gebl View Post
yes.

as usual, Bud Collins misjudges matters.

for the reasons in the quote above, Nadal has already pulled ahead of Borg on clay.

also, Federer can already be reasonably expected to be labelled the GOAT without needing to beat Nadal at RG.

thank you Bud for confirming (by putting forward the opposite) the above.
Fair enough, Federer would be the GOAT except for Laver

Nadal career prediction: 6 RG, 2 Wimbledon, 1 Australian Open, 1 US Open, 2 Master Cup, 20 Master Series, 65 titles.
(Predicted before RG 2008 when he had 3xRG)
--------
Quote:
The inhabitants of the Balearic Islands are said to have been the inventors of slings, and to have managed them with surprising dexterity, owing to the manner of bringing up their children. The children were not allowed to have their food by their mothers till they had first struck it with their sling.
~Vegetius, De Re Militari, late 4th century
Nadal: the last Balearic Slinger, the ultimate product of natural selection. Feel the weight of the centuries in the Topspin from Hell!
Bazooka is offline  
post #14 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 01:30 PM
Blown Out On the Trail
 
star's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 62,739
                     
Re: Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

Thanks for posting the article!

I figured the GOAT defenders would troop out to protest.
star is offline  
post #15 of 28 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 02:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,004
                     
Re: Collins: Nadal still not Borg's equal on clay

Rosewall lost 11 years of his prime at the Slams because he became a Pro. Laver lost 5 or 6 years of his prime. Had they played the Slams those years, both would have more than 14 Slam wins. Rosewall won 15 of the Pro Slams, against tougher competition, than those playing the Slams those 11 years. The same is true of Laver during his years as a Pro. GOAT? We will never know, for sure.
thrust is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome