THe French Open men final rating very very low - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 03:20 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 184
                     
THe French Open men final rating very very low

Nadal-Federer III draws lower rating
3 hours, 51 minutes ago

Buzz Up PrintNEW YORK (AP)—Rafael Nadal’s rout of Roger Federer in the French Open final drew the lowest TV rating of the duo’s three consecutive title matches in Paris.

NBC’s telecast of Nadal’s 6-1, 6-3, 6-0 victory Sunday drew an overnight rating of 1.8, the network said Monday.

It was the most lopsided Grand Slam men’s final in 24 years and lasted less than two hours.

That rating is down from the 2.2 rating in 2007, and the 2.1 in 2006. Each of those years, Nadal beat Federer in four sets.

This year’s rating is the lowest for the French Open men’s final since the 2003 championship also drew a 1.8 overnight.

NBC got a 1.8 rating for the women’s final Saturday, when Ana Ivanovic won her first Grand Slam title by beating Dinara Safina in straight sets. The rating was the same in 2007, when Ivanovic lost to Justine Henin.
zadle69 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 03:32 AM
Registered User
 
tennizen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 27,276
                     
Re: THe French Open men final rating very very low

I think US and clay don't go very well together. That's the most likely reason. Nothing to be surprised about.

“For life be, after all, only a waitin' for somethin' else than what we're doin'; and death be all that we can rightly depend on.” - Bram Stoker, Dracula
tennizen is offline  
post #3 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 03:48 AM
Registered User
 
Knightmace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,544
                     
Re: THe French Open men final rating very very low

^^^Agreed, it's all about the hard courts in US.
Knightmace is offline  
post #4 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 03:55 AM
Registered User
 
Oj-Ala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Somewhere dreaming...
Posts: 468
                     
Re: THe French Open men final rating very very low

Exactly.... they simply dont like clay....
Plus, wasnt the same (or very similar) situation some years ago with Wimbledon final ??? I think it was Federer versus... Roddick for the second time I guess... and I dont know if it was the BBC or which tv company but they posted on yahoo something very similar so....... for tv companies is all about money and they want spectacular ratings.....

GINEPRIRODDICKDJOKOVICMALISSEMURRAYFEDERERHAASNADAL
HEWITT
SAFINMATHIEUANCICLOPEZGAMBILLFISH
DEL POTROGASQUETKIEFERCLEMENTANDREEV...


"Im a great kisser" -Andy Roddick

Roger: YOU ARE GOLD !


Oj-Ala is offline  
post #5 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 03:58 AM
Last dance, Andy
 
tangerine_dream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York New Englander
Posts: 25,436
                     
Re: THe French Open men final rating very very low

Of all the slams Roland Garros gets the worst coverage (and no promotion) here in the states so it's no real surprise the ratings are low.

Plus it's no good for NBC to show only one taped semifinal. That angered their only viewers, the hardcore tennis fans. Nobody else was watching, they all went to the beach.

"What kind of shape am I in now? Well round is a shape." said Roddick with a laugh. "I had a very detailed retirement plan, and I feel like I've met every aspect of it: a lot of golf, a lot of carbs, a lot of fried food, and some booze, occasionally — I've been completely committed ... The results have shown."


Mugs Tennis Forums
tangerine_dream is offline  
post #6 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 04:32 AM
Registered User
 
Fedex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 17,533
                     
Re: THe French Open men final rating very very low

Quote:
Originally Posted by tangerine_dream View Post
Of all the slams Roland Garros gets the worst coverage (and no promotion) here in the states so it's no real surprise the ratings are low.

Plus it's no good for NBC to show only one taped semifinal. That angered their only viewers, the hardcore tennis fans. Nobody else was watching, they all went to the beach.
Yep.

And besides, I wouldn't expect a finals that was so one sided to generate great ratings anyway; many people probably flipped the channel after the first set.

"I think that now and until the end of my career, I can really play with my mind at peace, and no longer hear that I've never won Roland Garros." - Roger Federer
Fedex is offline  
post #7 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 07:15 AM
Registered User
 
rafa the best's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 230
                     
Re: THe French Open men final rating very very low

They get pathetic raitings even for US Open, who cares. FO final had great ratings in other countries especially Spain.

RAFAEL NADAL:

MARIA SHARAPOVA
rafa the best is offline  
post #8 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 07:28 AM
Registered User
 
Wojtek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gdañsk
Posts: 13,322
                     
Re: THe French Open men final rating very very low

Very big problem
Wojtek is offline  
post #9 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 07:42 AM
Registered User
 
Castafiore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,954
                     
Re: THe French Open men final rating very very low

Not really a surprising result.

Roland Garros scored excellent ratings in other countries like in Spain and France.
In Europe, Roland Garros and Wimbledon tend to get the highest ratings if I'm not mistaken. The Australian Open is not easy to show on tv because a lot of the matches take place in the middle of the night or in the morning over here and where I live, I struggle to find tv coverage for the US Open as well (and Eurosport focussing a lot on WTA doesn't really help either)
Castafiore is offline  
post #10 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 10:44 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 545
                     
Re: THe French Open men final rating very very low

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fedex View Post
Yep.

And besides, I wouldn't expect a finals that was so one sided to generate great ratings anyway; many people probably flipped the channel after the first set.
Maybe some people are tired of the same old Federer/Nadal `rivalry' year after year. New blood is needed as this RG Final clearly showed.
sanshisan is offline  
post #11 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 11:51 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 184
                     
Re: THe French Open men final rating very very low

snashian i agree with your point indeed. I think it is getting to that point.
zadle69 is offline  
post #12 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 11:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,769
                     
Re: THe French Open men final rating very very low

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanshisan View Post
Maybe some people are tired of the same old Federer/Nadal `rivalry' year after year. New blood is needed as this RG Final clearly showed.

The low rating correlates with the interest in tennis in N. America, period. About 2% play or are interested in the sport. so only 2% and a few more stragglers who click on the channel by mistake will watch. The rest of the population has no clue whether Federer is playing Nadal for the first time or the 20th time in the final. In fact they likely don't even know who they are. (For fun,do a survey, ask your neighbourts if they know who they are)

The enthusiasm for tennis and tennis players is a phenomenon of messageboards &/or those who go to tournaments and watch it on TV year long. About 2 % of the population.
michellej is offline  
post #13 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 11:57 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 184
                     
Re: THe French Open men final rating very very low

now compare this this sport is drawing people in and it is worldwide Will be the next big thing overtaking boxing probably. It is becoming even more popular now than tennis

Fight Biz: Live shows likely next round for NBC, Strikeforce
Steve Sievert, MMAjunkie.com
Jun 9, 2:07 pm EDT

Buzz Up PrintThe programming suits at NBC have a decision to make.

EliteXC’s Saturday Night Fights debut on CBS May 31 proved that live mixed martial arts is more than viable on network television. Despite the fact that most MMA fans jeered the show, ripping into everything from the production to the officiating, SNF was the most-watched MMA event in U.S. television history. The broadcast drew a peak audience of more than 6.5 million viewers â and 4.85 million viewers in total â to top the 5.9 million who tuned into the Quinton Jackson-Dan Henderson match at UFC 75.

Those are game-changing numbers that TV executives simply can’t ignore, especially when it comes to delivering the male, 18-to-34 audience that advertisers crave. That demographic comprised a sizeable portion of the viewers who tuned into SNF.

NBC already carries MMA, albeit in a time slot far removed from the bright lights of primetime. Strikeforce launched its weekly 30-minute taped series on the Peacock Network April 12. The promotion, which those familiar with the deal say purchased the airtime from the network, hoped the series would be the catalyst that leads to live shows on NBC.

“Periodically, we’re in talks (with NBC),” said Strikeforce’s Mike Afromowitz. “Of course, we want to be live on the network. That’s always been part of our long-term objective. People want to see live events. The show’s been a good way to introduce the brand and the product to people, but moving forward, we want to be live. That’s the next step.”

Not only do the ratings generated on CBS suggest that the next step might be imminent for NBC, programming brass at the network need to look no further than their own ratings to see that MMA draws a crowd. Viewership of “Strikeforce on NBC,” which follows “Poker After Dark” every Saturday night/early Sunday morning, has increased nearly 200 percent from its first show to one of its recent airings.

The fifth episode, during the week of May 5, drew an audience of 949,000 viewers. That topped the average ratings for other late-night fare, including “Jimmy Kimmel Live” and “The Late, Late Show with Craig Ferguson.”

“The show has exceeded our expectations,” said Afromowitz, who oversees selection of fights featured in the production. “We’re only several weeks into the series. We got the production together very quickly with minimal promotion. We didn’t have a big, big campaign to promote it, but word spread from the first week we were on.”

It seems only a matter of time before NBC makes a more significant commitment to MMA programming.

“We’re prepared for a live event,” said Afromowitz. “We’re ready to move forward. We have the venues, and we have the talent if we’re given the opportunity.”

Encore key to EliteXC success â In the wake of strong ratings for EliteXC on CBS, the question now is â can Gary Shaw and Co. do it again?

The first show was promoted exceedingly well by EliteXC. They scheduled a series of media conference calls, held open workouts to highlight fighters for media, had fighter video packages on the CBS website and drew considerable mainstream press.

While all of that drummed up interest in the show, no aspect of the broadcast promotion was more important to its success than the simple novelty of live MMA on network TV for the first time. That guaranteed that the show would get a sizeable audience, but the ratings topped even CBS’ projections.

The true test for the potential of a franchise-in-the-making in Saturday Night Fights will be measured with the second show, slated for late summer/early fall.

Tepid start to Ortiz book sales â Tito Ortiz’s autobiography, This Is Gonna Hurt: The Life of a Mixed Martial Arts Champion, hit book retailers last month, but it hasn’t been a hit so far with readers.

The 224-page read chronicles Ortiz’s challenging childhood, a trouble marriage and battles inside the Octagon. The cover of the book features Ortiz in a UFC championship belt, which, reportedly resulted in a cease-and-desist order from the UFC.

Ortiz kicked off a nine-city book tour this past Tuesday to jumpstart sales of the book, which currently falls short of making the list of the top 150 selling books in the country, according to USA Today.

Rival Chuck Liddell is currently the champion of MMA book sales. His memoir, My Fighting Life, hit The New York Times bestseller list earlier this year.

Further changing of the guard at IFL â Kurt Otto, one of the co-founders of the struggling International Fight League, has resigned from the company’s board of directors. Otto’s departure is described as a voluntary resignation. He will remain with the league in a matchmaking capacity and is still the company’s largest shareholder.

With Otto no longer on the board, the two men who conceptualized the IFL are no longer in leadership roles with the company. Co-founder Gareb Shamus resigned as CEO and board chair last November.

Steve Sievert is the Lead Staff Writer for MMAjunkie.com and the former MMA beat writer and blogger for the Houston Chronicle. He pens his “Fight Biz” column every other week.
zadle69 is offline  
post #14 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 12:29 PM
Registered User
 
Castafiore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,954
                     
Re: THe French Open men final rating very very low

Quote:
Maybe some people are tired of the same old Federer/Nadal `rivalry' year after year. New blood is needed as this RG Final clearly showed.
How do you explain the high tv ratings outside the USA (and not only in Spain) then?

Football (Soccer) doesn't get high tv ratings in the US. Oh noooooo....should we be getting worried about the popularity of football???
Castafiore is offline  
post #15 of 34 (permalink) Old 06-10-2008, 12:34 PM
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
 
IAMlegend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 198
                     
Re: THe French Open men final rating very very low

An education on the rising popularity of the MMA in the US doesn't seem incongruous at all--on this tennis blog

OK GAEL, THIS IS CALLED TRANSFERENCE
BASELINE.MARGOT.MARGOT.BASELINE. TREAT THEM BOTH AS EQUAL

FUTURE BEASTS: DEL POLTRO,GULBIS, CILIC, DONALD YOUNG
IAMlegend is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome