hello hello Rafa=fedkilla
, are u listening. this is specially for u.
i've seen u plenty of times mentioning that djoko and rafa have saved mens tennis
but my following fair analysis will prove who actually saved the mens tennis, what wouldve been the state of mens tennis without roger
if u go back when roddick
won US open, there was a buzz around that america has found a new champ who will carry on where pete left, who will help to fill the gap left by petes retirement and carry america forward
just imagine if there was no roger, it would have become a reality and rod would have had atleast 6/7 slams and u know how. A serve only mug
wouldve been the dominant force of mens tennis atleast for 2/3 years. oh God..
then comes nadal
. he would have had 2 wimb titles. a moonballer, who doesnt know how to serve or return a serve, who only knows how to run and keep ball in play wouldve been 2 times wimb champ .he also wouldve been the no 1 player for atleast 3 yrs with so many limitations to his game.
wouldnt that have made a complete mockery of mens tennis.
my goodness me isnt it scary.
now who would u like to have dominate the mens tennis
1 roddick who only knows how to serve
2 rafa the moonballer, enough said about him
3 or the man with a complete game in the the history of tennis who can play on all surafces
the ans is clear.
im sure if there was no roger, all his critics here and everywhere wouldve wished that there was such a guy represented by option no 3 playing tennis.
the truth is there to see. open up your eyes and ur hearts, all the fedhaters, there is still time
or u'll miss him when he will retire.