Originally Posted by Hewitt =Legend
I'm all for equality in tennis but Murray brought up an excellent point during Wimbledon. As the female players are spending less time on court (for the most part), and their matches are less physically taxing, they have the option of participating in the doubles event and thus can generate even more revenue than the men. The Williams sisters are a perfect example of the aforementioned point.
It is an excellent point brought up by Murray and a very intelligent way of generating debate about equal prize money without sparking negative debate about women's rights.
Not a valid point imo.
Girls play 3 setters coz that's their maximum. Guys are stronger and they can play 5 setters.
Both genders have players doing singles and doubles at the same time.
You can't give different prizes to the Olympic gold medalist male at 100m and less to the Olympic gold medalist female at 100m.
Yes, she is slower, but it took her the same amount of work and sacrifice to be the best in her gender. She attracts as many spectators as the guys, so why less money for the ladies?