Thirdly, the reason these players have been so heavily criticised is because there is no reason for them to pick this fight which can only damage the sport. The women aren't taking money away from them and there is no prospect the decision to award equal pay will be reversed so what is the point of them bringing it up? Is it just to cause trouble? Is it because they are unlikeable players who would never receive any attention unless they say something controversial?
I quite honestly can't believe that such a juvenile a nd petty person such as you is also made out of 70% water just like me. It's mindboggling.
Tipsarevic, Stakhovsky and Simon are each more likable and interesting that 90% of the joke tour that is the WTA.
The absolutely hilarious part of this debate is that Stakhovsky didn't say that he wants women to receive less. He even explicitly said that he doesn't care how much women earn. Yet, whiny feminists and the homosexuals over at TF keep whining because Stakhy is making statements and arguments he literally never made.
What absolutely gets me is that, the main argument that these supposed "mysogynists" produce, the best of 5 sets argument, is actually far more progressive and egalitarian that any of those queens could possibly even conceive. Topsy basically says that it's laughable that women here are made to play a different, physically less demanding sport....just because.
Feminists used to complain because women weren't allowed to run marathons. Now they complain because Tipsy wants them to play the sport under the same rules. This is the first time a guy asking for equal pay for equal work is derided as a sexist ****.
I also haven't seen a bunch of people torn apart quite as hard as the girls here in this thread. I mean you probably can't even comprehend how superior these guys are to you in reasoning and debating skill, but let me tell you, it's a MASSACRE.