The Federer Decline Thread - Page 75 - MensTennisForums.com
View Poll Results: Do you agree with Pete?
No. I think Federer's decline is a fact and he's not winning any major in the future. 39 17.57%
I kinda agree... He's in a great moment, but the other 2 guys are too good. No more slams for Feddy 45 20.27%
I totally agree. Fed's still playing great tennis and he'll probably win another major 105 47.30%
Hello. I'm Rod Laver and my records are intact. Suck it losers. 33 14.86%
Voters: 222. You may not vote on this poll

 1Likes
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1111 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-16-2012, 11:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Age: 47
Posts: 3,574
                     
Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by EliSter View Post
Indeed, but in case of Fed and Nadal, if they play 27 times from now on H2H would be same if not even worse. Clearly Nadal knows how to deal with Federer.
Finally some sense from a nole troll. Nadull knows how to deal with fed. Play him on clay and slow high bouncing HC an avoid federer like the plague for the second half of the year the low bouncing faster tour. Especially when not 100%.

The law of nature,only the strong survive.




THE GREAT TACTICAL RIVALRY OF THE OPEN ERA
FEDERER 10 VS TONI NADAL 20
ADVANTAGE TONI NADAL
RAPHEAL NADULL,A PRETTY FACE & MUSCLE
NOTHING MORE

Fed 2 nadull 13 fed is nadull CLAY TURKEY. THE REAL ERA 2003-2010.
luie is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #1112 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-16-2012, 11:15 PM
country flag sco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 631
                     
Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatness View Post
It's nice to say all that but Novak didn't take away number 1 ranking away from Nadal because of winning an ATP 500.

Fed is always exhausted when he loses. If he's so good he wouldn't have needed to play 58 games to win a best of 3 on grass against Del Potro for which grass is his worst surface.
The ranking are based on a 12 month period - not only dependent on a single ATP 500 tourney.

Likewise, if Nole is so good he wouldn't have LOST a best of 3 (in straight sets) on grass to Del Potro for whom grass is his worst surface.

Last edited by sco; 08-16-2012 at 11:21 PM.
sco is offline  
post #1113 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-16-2012, 11:31 PM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,672
                     
Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Drop to #4? Someone is butt hurt.
Honestly is offline  
post #1114 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-17-2012, 12:00 AM
Registered User
 
IOFH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 26
Posts: 3,678
                     
Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

If everyone rotated answering to his/her posts, I wonder how long Greatness (lol) would continue to troll in here.

Actual cannibal
IOFH is offline  
post #1115 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-17-2012, 01:36 AM
Registered User
 
chenx15's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Age: 61
Posts: 2,045
                     
Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Greatness reaching GOAT level of trollness fast. such a prodigy!

the Fed vs anderson IW 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by SheepleBuster View Post
Fed ... don't F this up. You got the break. Just finish this. I got work tomorrow, I got kids... wife needs affection. Give me a break man.
chenx15 is offline  
post #1116 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-17-2012, 04:47 AM
Registered User
 
rickcastle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 934
                     
Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatness View Post
The weak era argument is backed 1000% by stats.
Maybe in a world where 1000% is considered a proper statistical value.

Keep it coming though man, your butthurt gives me life.
rickcastle is offline  
post #1117 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-17-2012, 07:01 AM
Registered User
 
Johnbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,566
                     
Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatness View Post
It's nice to say all that but Novak didn't take away number 1 ranking away from Nadal because of winning an ATP 500.
Fed is always exhausted when he loses. If he's so good he wouldn't have needed to play 58 games to win a best of 3 on grass against Del Potro for which grass is his worst surface.


as far as i can remember, fed became #1 again by beating djokovic in the semifinal and winning wimbledon against murray...

and at least fed is good enough to beat del potro on grass...
Johnbert is offline  
post #1118 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-17-2012, 07:02 AM
Registered User
 
Jverweij's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Age: 34
Posts: 5,222
                     
Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

A word of advice to those talking badly about other players.

Talking Federer down does not make Djokovic a great player and vice versa.

Some of you people here remind me of religious zealouts who criticize evolution, thinking that that will prove them right.. It doesn't make any sense!

Novak is a great player, Roger is a great player, Rafa is a great player, end of story.
Jverweij is offline  
post #1119 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-17-2012, 12:23 PM
Registered User
 
Sophocles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Age: 42
Posts: 9,036
                     
Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatness View Post
What many variables? Far more skilled players of today would destroy the weaker field Federer faced. You don't need a million variables to realize that Bagdhatis/Roddick/Gonzalez/etc at their best are nowhere near as good as Novak/Rafa/Murray.
Let's see if we can get your creaking synapses moving with this: the point is not whether Novak/Rafa/Murray are better than Baghdatis/Roddick/Gonzalez. Of course they are. The question is whether they are better than Federer, & to determine that, we have to ask whether Bag/Rod/Gonzo are any worse than the people Novak/Rafa/Murray have beaten in winning slams - i.e., the Soderlings, Berdychs, & Tsongas of this world. It is abundantly obvious that they are not.

"There is no such thing as 'the world'." - Enoch Powell.

Last edited by Sophocles; 08-17-2012 at 12:34 PM.
Sophocles is offline  
post #1120 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-17-2012, 12:44 PM
Federer Fan & Dull Hater
 
duarte_a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 11,209
                     
Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Djokovic is not in the same league as nadal and Roger.

Roger and nadal are in the top 10 all time greats. Djokovic is one or two tiers below.

djokovic had a great 2011. Be happy for that because as we've seen so far in 2012 it won't be happening again.
duarte_a is online now  
post #1121 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-17-2012, 12:51 PM
Registered User
 
manadrainer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 33
Posts: 2,280
                     
Weak era argument is dead. Long live weak era argument.


29th january 2017: 18 slams!

The Maestro delivers his masterpiece: Roger Federer defeats Rafael Nadal 6-4, 3-6, 6-1, 3-6, 6-3!

The King is back!

18 Grand Slam titles
7 Wimbledon titles
302 weeks at #1
Legend
manadrainer is offline  
post #1122 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-17-2012, 12:51 PM
Registered User
 
Nole fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,624
                     
Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by duarte_a View Post
Djokovic is not in the same league as nadal and Roger.

Roger and nadal are in the top 10 all time greats. Djokovic is one or two tiers below.

djokovic had a great 2011. Be happy for that because as we've seen so far in 2012 it won't be happening again.
You're so arrogant, truth will come to bite you in the ass.
Things change very quickly in tennis and Novak has been in almost every final this year, not what I would call a bad season. he already won AO, Miami and Toronto and could win USO very possibly, which would make his year better than Roger's or Rafa's. And he would still end nº1. So be careful what you wish for.



Novak Djokovic nº1!

The Golden Era of Novak: Australian Open * Dubai * Indian Wells * Miami * Belgrade * Madrid * Rome * Wimbledon * Montreal * US Open * Abu Dhabi * Australian Open * Miami * Toronto * China * Shanghai * World Tour Finals 2012 * Australian Open 2013 * Dubai * Montecarlo * Beijing * Shanghai * Paris * WTF * Indian Wells * Miami * Rome * WIMBLEDON 2014 * AUSSIE OPEN 2015
Federer to Nole: "Amazing year. Amazing tournament. Amazing match. You are THE BEST!"
Nole fan is offline  
post #1123 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-17-2012, 01:12 PM
Federer Fan & Dull Hater
 
duarte_a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 11,209
                     
Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nole fan View Post
You're so arrogant


What did I say that was arrogant. You're a bit touchy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nole fan View Post
Things change very quickly in tennis and Novak has been in almost every final this year, not what I would call a bad season. he already won AO, Miami and Toronto and could win USO very possibly, which would make his year better than Roger's or Rafa's.
And did I say the opposite?!

I said he won't have another season like 2011, 3 slams and 5 masters. Of course he's having a good season, as Roger has said any season where you win a slam is a good season.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nole fan View Post
So be careful what you wish for.
I really can't see what you mean with this....

I merely stated 2 things which are true in my eyes, and the majority of people will agree with me I believe.

#1 Roger and nadal are in another league. Djokovic is below them.
#2 Djokovic won't have another season like 2011.

I didn't wish for anything nor did I say djokovic's season has been bad so far.

If you want to implicate with someone at least make a valid argument.
duarte_a is online now  
post #1124 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-17-2012, 01:12 PM
Banned!
 
Corey Feldman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 95,412
                     
Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Corey Feldman is offline  
post #1125 of 1591 (permalink) Old 08-17-2012, 04:29 PM
Registered User
 
Greatness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 979
                     
Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by luie View Post
As expected , u didn't understand what I was saying. In a unilateral battle nadull is greater than fed on Slow courts if they meet . My point is apart from the USO 2010 nadull is pretty irrelevant this time of the year.
The meetings favor nadull predominantly. Nadull had treatment to the knee before MC but he chose to play the clay season. Was successful. He had treatment after Wimby and chose to sit out. Why. Because he isn't that successful at this period of the year for a number of reason.
Even uncle toni said the doctor told nadull to take a rest to regenerate the tendons n ligaments but he still chose to play the entire clay season. In 2009 he missed Wimby. However played the FO. Seems anytime he is destroyed by a flat hitter exposing his weakness he takes a break.
As for RG 08. Fed was declining even before he meet nadull. He had food poisoning any way taken to the hospital never recovered. Lost to his pigeons Roddick , radek Novak at the time.
So he was in a weaken state with no confidence and he tried something different under Jose higueras . It didn't work. Nadull level was high that year his absolute prime that year.
Fed didn't play too much baseline points that match.
Thus leading to that shoreline.
Never meet at the USO,
Fed is always declining even though in his prime he lost to mugs.
His achievements are severely tarnished by his constant failures against Rafa in the slams, which clearly proves that one man alone can easily dominate a weak field since Rafa dominated Federer who was collecting slams easily against mugs in the previous years.


Quote:
Originally Posted by sco View Post
The ranking are based on a 12 month period - not only dependent on a single ATP 500 tourney.

Likewise, if Nole is so good he wouldn't have LOST a best of 3 (in straight sets) on grass to Del Potro for whom grass is his worst surface.
12 month period or not, had Federer not played a measly 500 ATP in Rotterdam, he wouldn't be #1 regardless of having won Wimbledon.
Basically, a slam didn't make the difference to claim him the #1, it was a mug tournament win that gave him the #1 ranking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnbert View Post


as far as i can remember, fed became #1 again by beating djokovic in the semifinal and winning wimbledon against murray...

and at least fed is good enough to beat del potro on grass...
But he isn't good enough to beat 34 year old Haas on grass.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophocles View Post
Let's see if we can get your creaking synapses moving with this: the point is not whether Novak/Rafa/Murray are better than Baghdatis/Roddick/Gonzalez. Of course they are. The question is whether they are better than Federer, & to determine that, we have to ask whether Bag/Rod/Gonzo are any worse than the people Novak/Rafa/Murray have beaten in winning slams - i.e., the Soderlings, Berdychs, & Tsongas of this world. It is abundantly obvious that they are not.
Reading comprehension isn't your forte. The point is not whether or not Novak/Rafa/Murray are better than Federer because that's not what I argued: the merit of winning slams against mugs is what I have been arguing. It is abundantly obvious that the current Rafa/Murray/Novak are far better than the opposition Federer faced in 2003-2006 which is why I said collecting so many slams so quickly doesn't make Federer as impressive as some think. It is still a difficult task to maintain a high level but had he been absent from that time and prime Novak/Rafa/Murray were there, either one of them would have collected several slams.


Also, if you think the previous field of Bag/Rod/Gonzo are no worse than the current players Novak/Murray/Rafa are beating then obviously what I have been saying is true because Novak/Murray/Rafa have been beating the Tsonga/Berdych/Soderling on the way to making slam fnals or winning slams.

Whether or not Nole/Rafa are better than Federer can be argued eventually because they are both over 5 years younger than Federer and have a long way to go in their careers; what can't be argued is the fact that they both beat Federer several times on their way to winning slams.
So if people want to argue that winning a slam in a time when Novak/Rafa/Federer/Murray are playing at a high level is easier than when Roddick/Gonzo/Bag/Hewitt were playing at their best then all I can do is laugh at the sheer stupidity of that notion.

Last edited by Greatness; 08-17-2012 at 04:34 PM.
Greatness is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome