The Federer Decline Thread - Page 34 - MensTennisForums.com

View Poll Results: Do you agree with Pete?
No. I think Federer's decline is a fact and he's not winning any major in the future. 39 17.57%
I kinda agree... He's in a great moment, but the other 2 guys are too good. No more slams for Feddy 45 20.27%
I totally agree. Fed's still playing great tennis and he'll probably win another major 105 47.30%
Hello. I'm Rod Laver and my records are intact. Suck it losers. 33 14.86%
Voters: 222. You may not vote on this poll

 1Likes
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #496 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:14 AM
Registered User
 
azinna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,665
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SheepleBuster View Post
....My main problem is with Novak. He is a great player. But he is a couple of classes below Roger and Rafa. Roger should have beaten him at the U.S. Open for two straight years. The young Roger would not have choked those match points. Let's get real....
I just don't see how a careful observer of tennis can say the above with such confidence. Tennis at that level, in those matches and during those points is mental. And there was too much going on there to simply say that a half-step faster Federer would have taken those points. I was there at last year's semi and could see how pissed -- even disgusted -- Federer was at Djokovic's go-for-broke forehand on the first match point. And the arm-raising for the crowd. I remember saying to my friend, "What's up with that face? He better not lose his focus...."

....

<---"Espera. ¿Dónde están?"

Always on the lookout for a great tennis match.
azinna is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #497 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:26 AM
Registered User
 
Mark Lenders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 17,212
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tribalfusion View Post
It may be debatable but let's look at some facts...Safin at his best barely beat Federer. Nadal at his very best made it hard for Roger to win GAMES.

Nadal and Djokovic are of course more consistent but you are selling them short to make it only about consistency yet to take once in a lifetime performances from the others (which usually didn't blow Roger out...certainly not like Nadal has and not even as Djokovic has beaten him)
That assumes that Federer was playing the same level, which is not the case.

Federer was imperial in AO 2005; it was surely one of his best ever Grand Slam tournaments in terms of level. He was just blowing everyone off easily, including Agassi who was dismissed in easy 3 sets in the quarters. He had something like 25-30 matches unbeaten. I don't remember the bookies odds, but only very optimistic Safin fans believed he could even trouble Roger in that semi.

FO 2008 on the other hand was one of the least convincing marches to the final from Federer, it was basically his aura that got him there despite not playing even near to his best.

It is not without reason that many regard Federer vs Safin of AO 05 as one of the best matches in tennis history, it was sublime quality from both. It was the real final of that tournament, no doubt Federer would have easily crushed Hewitt in the final had he made it.
Mark Lenders is offline  
post #498 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:28 AM
Registered User
 
Mark Lenders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 17,212
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspindoctor View Post
The problem is that kind of level is not sustainable. You can't serve bombs and paint the lines in every match.

My main problem with guys like Tsonga, Berdych etc is that they lack plan B. Whenever their high risk ballbashing game isn't working, they are vulnerable to any top 30 player due to the outbreaks of unforced errors when they have an "off day". Thus their inconsistency.

Whenever guys like Nadal, Djokovic are having an "off day" they can fall back on their defense and grind out their matches. Tsonga/Berdych/Sodering live and die by the sword so to speak. Their best is unplayble, but their worst is utterly horrendous.
Absolutely. That's why Djokovic and Nadal are far better players overall.

That said, those guys - Tsonga, Berdych... - would probably have more success than they have so far if they lived in an era of faster surfaces.
Mark Lenders is offline  
post #499 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:32 AM
Registered User
 
Mark Lenders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 17,212
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

Quote:
Originally Posted by thrust View Post
A truly great player, plays great tennis on a consistant basis and does not get injured often. Nalbandian, Safin and Hewitt could play great tennis every now and then but the fact is Roddick has one slam, Safin had two, Hewitt had two, Nalbandian has none. Combined they have less than half of what Sampras has, never mind what Roger has. Today you have a still great Roger, a great Nadal and a great Novak. Del Potro has a slam, but seems injury prone, Murray is a head case.
Bullshit. Injuries are mostly down to luck. Had Federer or Nadal suffered a career-threatening injury right after they won their first Slam title (or even before), today we'd be wondering about what could have been instead of praising them as legends of the game.

There have been multiple cases of extraordinary athletes being derailed by injuries, it's just something that is out of your control most times. Some are just more fortunate that others in that regard; believe it or not, luck does play a part in sports as well.
Mark Lenders is offline  
post #500 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:36 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sen'jin Village
Age: 32
Posts: 18,509
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

There is a difference between a freak, unexpected injury and an injury derived from gamestyle, poor technique, lack of fitness etc.

Safin's and Nalbandian's injures weren't freak or unlucky. They happened because they failed to put in the hours into their fitness.

Olderer and Nadal sacrificed their lives for the sport. Safin and Nalbandian chose to whore around. It's disrepectful to say they were more "lucky" when they actually put their heart and soul into tennis.
Topspindoctor is offline  
post #501 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:36 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,889
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Lenders View Post
That assumes that Federer was playing the same level, which is not the case.

Federer was imperial in AO 2005; it was surely one of his best ever Grand Slam tournaments in terms of level. He was just blowing everyone off easily, including Agassi who was dismissed in easy 3 sets in the quarters. He had something like 25-30 matches unbeaten. I don't remember the bookies odds, but only very optimistic Safin fans believed he could even trouble Roger in that semi.

FO 2008 on the other hand was one of the least convincing marches to the final from Federer, it was basically his aura that got him there despite not playing even near to his best.

It is not without reason that many regard Federer vs Safin of AO 05 as one of the best matches in tennis history, it was sublime quality from both. It was the real final of that tournament, no doubt Federer would have easily crushed Hewitt in the final had he made it.
There is a problem here though Mark. Nadal at his best can actually shut Roger down on clay such that of course it won't be a great match to watch. It is impressive to see the extent of it though and that was my point if we are talking top level games.

Safin at his best could certainly not shut Roger down on any surface. He had no easy victory over Roger. EVER.

Big difference.
tribalfusion is offline  
post #502 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,889
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspindoctor View Post

Safin's and Nalbandian's injures weren't freak or unlucky. They happened because they failed to put in the hours into their fitness.

Olderer and Nadal sacrificed their lives for the sport. Safin and Nalbandian chose to whore around. It's disrepectful to say they were more "lucky" when they actually put their heart and soul into tennis.
There is a lot of truth to this and perhaps we should regard this kind of concentration/focus as talent as well.
tribalfusion is offline  
post #503 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:42 AM
Registered User
 
Mark Lenders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 17,212
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tribalfusion View Post
There is a problem here though Mark. Nadal at his best can actually shut Roger down on clay such that of course it won't be a great match to watch. It is impressive to see the extent of it though and that was my point if we are talking top level games.

Safin at his best could certainly not shut Roger down on any surface. He had no easy victory over Roger. EVER.

Big difference.
Yes, he can. But can he shut down Roger at his best? I think it's safe to assume that, for his standards, Federer wasn't in great form in the spring of 2008.

I do concede though that, on clay, Nadal at his best is surely better than Safin at his best, and most other players in history as well.

Not sure it's the same on other surfaces though.
Mark Lenders is offline  
post #504 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:46 AM
Registered User
 
tektonac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,307
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger the Dodger View Post
Sampras is correct. Don't argue with someone who has 14 slams.
+ Wilander's 7 = 21.

ASI Director-General Gautam Sengupta said the list of India's treasures held abroad was "too long to handle" and there was a need for a "diplomatic and legal campaign" for their restitution from institutions, including the British Museum, the Royal Collection and the Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery.
tektonac is offline  
post #505 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:46 AM
Registered User
 
Mark Lenders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 17,212
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspindoctor View Post
There is a difference between a freak, unexpected injury and an injury derived from gamestyle, poor technique, lack of fitness etc.

Safin's and Nalbandian's injures weren't freak or unlucky. They happened because they failed to put in the hours into their fitness.

Olderer and Nadal sacrificed their lives for the sport. Safin and Nalbandian chose to whore around. It's disrepectful to say they were more "lucky" when they actually put their heart and soul into tennis.
There's an element of true to this, but some players get injured despite putting him all the hardowork. Look at Hewitt, who had his career completely derailed by injuries despite being one of the hardest workers and fittest players around.

Or even your favorite hate subject Del Potro, who got a nasty wrist injury after winning his first Slam.

It can happen; sometimes even all the fitness work in the world can't help you. There's no shortage of extraordinary athletes who had their careers cut short by injuries.
Mark Lenders is offline  
post #506 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:49 AM
Registered User
 
Mountaindewslave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12,105
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tribalfusion View Post
It may be debatable but let's look at some facts...Safin at his best barely beat Federer. Nadal at his very best made it hard for Roger to win GAMES.

Nadal and Djokovic are of course more consistent but you are selling them short to make it only about consistency yet to take once in a lifetime performances from the others (which usually didn't blow Roger out...certainly not like Nadal has and not even as Djokovic has beaten him)
dawg get real the only times Nadal has made it 'hard for Roger to win games' were when Roger was far past his prime. and 08 Roland Garros is in fact past Federer's prime.... get real man

<3 Roger Federer <3 David Ferrer <3 Juan Martin Del Potro <3 Ernest Gulbis <3

------------------------ <3 Richard Gasquet <3

Rafael Nadal
Mountaindewslave is offline  
post #507 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,889
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Lenders View Post
Yes, he can. But can he shut down Roger at his best? I think it's safe to assume that, for his standards, Federer wasn't in great form in the spring of 2008.

I do concede though that, on clay, Nadal at his best is surely better than Safin at his best, and most other players in history as well.

Not sure it's the same on other surfaces though.

My guess is that it wouldn't much have mattered how Federer felt going into the 2008 FO, he was going to get a beating from that Nadal on clay. I am not sure about the other surfaces either necessarily but along with the consistency, that's more than enough for me.

I don't think we are disagreeing on much at this point though...thanks for the civil conversation.
tribalfusion is offline  
post #508 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:49 AM
Registered User
 
reery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 834
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

Fed's declined, specially at wimbledon. Pete is full of it.
reery is offline  
post #509 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,889
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountaindewslave View Post
dawg get real the only times Nadal has made it 'hard for Roger to win games' were when Roger was far past his prime. and 08 Roland Garros is in fact past Federer's prime.... get real man
2008 would make Federer 26. In what UNIVERSE is 26 far past a tennis player's prime?

Get real yourself.
tribalfusion is offline  
post #510 of 1591 (permalink) Old 05-24-2012, 01:52 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sen'jin Village
Age: 32
Posts: 18,509
                     
Re: Sampras: "I don't see any decline in Federer" Do you agree?

Not to mention Olderer made 2008 Wimbledon final without dropping a set and went on to win USO the same year.
Topspindoctor is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome