I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss at tmc 2005 from now on - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 10:27 PM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Uppsala
Posts: 3,123
                     
I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss at tmc 2005 from now on

Was I the only one who could see back then that Federer was simply beeing outplayed by Nalbandian in that final? He had some minor injury problems, the same kind Nadal had in the wimbledon final this year, it really disappointed me that Nalbandians surreal performance was not fully aknowledged by most people in MTF (not only the Fed tards). Can we from today on not make excuses to why Federer was outplayed for most of the match and simply get down to the fact that if you are not at the top of your game and Nalbandian is at his absolute best stuff like that happens, even if you are at the top of your game and your name is Roger Federer you can still lose a match against Nalbandian.

Last edited by marcRD; 10-21-2007 at 10:32 PM.
marcRD is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 10:32 PM
_._._._._._
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 32
Posts: 72,524
                     
Re: I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss in tmc 2005 from now on

Fat chance, Federer only loses for a variety of reasons, and none of them are due to him being outplayed.
adee-gee is offline  
post #3 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 10:34 PM
Motherhater
 
RagingLamb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 5,571
                     
Re: I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss in tmc 2005 from now on

It would be nice to agree with something like that.

However, we don't know for certain at what level each player performed today, and we can't really know that. We can say based on common sense that they were close to their best or not, but that's as accurate as it gets.

So there will always be those who will exploit this margin of error to argue that someone wasn't at their best etc. when they lost.

Nice idea though.

And I agree that Roger was outplayed, but was he at his best? Can't say for sure. Was he close to it? Maybe. Same goes for Nalbandian.
RagingLamb is offline  
post #4 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 10:36 PM
Motherhater
 
RagingLamb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 5,571
                     
Re: I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss in tmc 2005 from now on

Quote:
Originally Posted by adeegee!. View Post
Fat chance, Federer only loses for a variety of reasons, and none of them are due to him being outplayed.
hey isn't that from some sort of encyclopedia?

Encyclopedia Fedtardica?
RagingLamb is offline  
post #5 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 10:38 PM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Uppsala
Posts: 3,123
                     
Re: I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss in tmc 2005 from now on

Quote:
Originally Posted by adeegee!. View Post
Fat chance, Federer only loses for a variety of reasons, and none of them are due to him being outplayed.
Well, it is rare to see him beeing outplayed. I mean he lost to Canas and Djokovic this year because he didnt take his chanses and lost important points, the same goes for Safin in AO 2005, he was not outplayed in that match. Federer actually can only be outplayed when he plays Nadal on clay (I think he was outplayed most of the match in wimbledon this year too) and when he plays Nalbandian on almost any surface.

Federer is quite lucky Nalbandian doesnt play up to his potential in grand slams, he could lose some grand slams outside RG if Nalby becomes more consistent.
marcRD is offline  
post #6 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 10:43 PM
Registered User
 
World Beater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,922
                     
Re: I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss at tmc 2005 from now on

federer played a different nalbandian that day. Nalbandian won 7-6 in a TB. So i really dont quite see it as being outplayed. Remember that federer also served for the match.

Federer did have some fitness problems as i recall but that is different. He had his chances and didnt take them

Today's nalbandian was better than that one, and today's federer was much better than the one that showed up at the TMC.

There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.

-Richard Feynman

World Beater is offline  
post #7 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 10:44 PM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Uppsala
Posts: 3,123
                     
Re: I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss in tmc 2005 from now on

Quote:
Originally Posted by RagingLamb View Post
It would be nice to agree with something like that.

However, we don't know for certain at what level each player performed today, and we can't really know that. We can say based on common sense that they were close to their best or not, but that's as accurate as it gets.

So there will always be those who will exploit this margin of error to argue that someone wasn't at their best etc. when they lost.

Nice idea though.

And I agree that Roger was outplayed, but was he at his best? Can't say for sure. Was he close to it? Maybe. Same goes for Nalbandian.
Federer was not at his best, but he was not far from it. He played some of the most fantastic tennis I have seen him play this year in the first 2 sets, but Federer didnt really serve at his best which is cruscial against Nalbandian and he did some UEs too many even if most of them were becase he was feeling the pressure to end points quickly against Nalbandian.

Lets just say that Federer was good enought today to defeat Nadal or any other player than Nalbandian in 2 straight sets on this surface.

Even if Federer had been at his best I think Nalby would have a chanse to beat Federer.
marcRD is offline  
post #8 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 10:48 PM
Registered User
 
R.Federer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,821
                     
Re: I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss in tmc 2005 from now on

Quote:
Originally Posted by adeegee!. View Post
Fat chance, Federer only loses for a variety of reasons, and none of them are due to him being outplayed.
Nice qualification of chance here.
Fat Dave knows how to play him, has a game style that can weather the offense and produce about as good or better defense as Federer. I think here on, it is going to be a tossup who wins. His game style certainly is not one which will always give him the edge like Nadal's does.

I would be happy to see Fit Dave back in the mix, you just don't know what you are going to get with him and Safin.

Whoever watched the match today can say without such a bother about it that the player who imposed his game, won. Federer had chances but could not take them, not by bad luck or bad day. He seemed to get impatient and seemed to be distracted in the third, maybe about the break chance back at 4-5 in the 2nd.
R.Federer is offline  
post #9 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 10:48 PM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Uppsala
Posts: 3,123
                     
Re: I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss at tmc 2005 from now on

Quote:
Originally Posted by World Beater View Post
federer played a different nalbandian that day. Nalbandian won 7-6 in a TB. So i really dont quite see it as being outplayed. Remember that federer also served for the match.

Federer did have some fitness problems as i recall but that is different. He had his chances and didnt take them
Even in the 1st 2 sets Federer was having major problems against Nalbadian in the rallies but with his serve working and great mental strength he won 2 close tiebreaks. he lost the next 2 sets 2-6 1-6 and was losing 0-4 in the 3rd set when Nalbandian was playing superhuman tennis and Federer had some confidense and fitness problems. I have however to this day never seen anyone outplay Federer like Nalby was doing in these 2 and a half sets.

Quote:
Originally Posted by World Beater View Post
Today's nalbandian was better than that one, and today's federer was much better than the one that showed up at the TMC.
Agreed.
marcRD is offline  
post #10 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 10:50 PM
Motherhater
 
RagingLamb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 5,571
                     
Re: I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss in tmc 2005 from now on

Quote:
Originally Posted by marcRD View Post
Federer was not at his best, but he was not far from it. He played some of the most fantastic tennis I have seen him play this year in the first 2 sets, but Federer didnt really serve at his best which is cruscial against Nalbandian and he did some UEs too many even if most of them were becase he was feeling the pressure to end points quickly against Nalbandian.

Lets just say that Federer was good enought today to defeat Nadal or any other player than Nalbandian in 2 straight sets on this surface.

Even if Federer had been at his best I think Nalby would have a chanse to beat Federer.
I personally agree with what you're saying. Even if RFed wasn't at his best, he was close enough to it, it would seem.

I'm just trying to point out that there is a margin of error in these statements, and that people will likely use this margin to argue against otherwise valid points.
RagingLamb is offline  
post #11 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 10:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 591
                     
Re: I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss at tmc 2005 from now on

I know it is totally out of topic, but i really think that "if a player X is at his best" concept is pure crap.
GonzoFed is offline  
post #12 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 10:55 PM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Uppsala
Posts: 3,123
                     
Re: I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss at tmc 2005 from now on

When Nalbandian plays Federer it is all about confidence. Both play aggresive tennis trying to hit the lines, so whoever is leading is often high on confidence and is more relaxed he is the one who will during a rally try the backhand dtl and take initiatives. That is why sets often end 6-1 to Federer or the other way around, when they are on a roll they become very confident and the other player starts to doubt and becomes afraid. I could see that in Federer in the end of this match, he was afraid of the Nalby returns on his 2nd serve, he was afraid to go to the net, to hit difficult shots. Nalby on the other hand in the end of the match was strikin the ball with the most incredible angles and with alot of pace and precision, Federer was doing the same in the 1st set which was the best set I have seen Federer play in a very long time.
marcRD is offline  
post #13 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 10:56 PM
Registered User
 
tripb19's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,174
                     
Re: I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss at tmc 2005 from now on

Injury excuses are Defence 101 of supporting a tennis player. Doesn't matter, he proved that victory wasn't a fluke today.

David Nalbandian /.\ Marcos Baghdatis /.\ Juan Martin Del Potro /.\ Alejandro Falla /.\ Bernard Tomic /.\ Gustavo Kuerton /.\
/.\Roger Federer /.\

Quote:
Originally Posted by my0118
Watch your hero getting schooled by Nalbandian like this pansy again.
At least this pansy took 6 games from Nalby whilst your hero took 3 games in Madrid.
Oct/Nov 2007: There was a time in history when the quality of a tennis player was determined by how many games he won off David Nalbandian.
tripb19 is offline  
post #14 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 10:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 591
                     
Re: I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss at tmc 2005 from now on

Quote:
Originally Posted by tripb19 View Post
Injury excuses are Defence 101 of supporting a tennis player. Doesn't matter, he proved that victory wasn't a fluke today.
Ok. What do you think of RG 2006 SF between these two?
GonzoFed is offline  
post #15 of 49 (permalink) Old 10-21-2007, 11:00 PM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Uppsala
Posts: 3,123
                     
Re: I hope not to hear the injury excuses for Federers loss at tmc 2005 from now on

Quote:
Originally Posted by GonzoFed View Post
I know it is totally out of topic, but i really think that "if a player X is at his best" concept is pure crap.
It is, only if it is used in a biased way only trying to lift your favorite. But it is a fact that level of tennis that you play is like a roller coaster, it has ups and downs but how high can you go and how low can you go?

Nadal can go very high and never gows low, Nalbandian outside clay can go higher than Nadal but also most often much lower.

I think it is crap when fans say that Safin at his best would defeat anyone or that Federer at his best would defeat Nadal at his best on clay. That is the kind of biased bullshit which has misused the term "if a player X is at his best".
marcRD is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome