1000,500,250... how much for the slams? - MensTennisForums.com

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 9 (permalink) Old 10-04-2007, 12:56 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 28
                     
1000,500,250... how much for the slams?

I'm wondering. Does anybody know how many points will be awarded for a slam next year?
This year is 1000 for a slam and 500 for a master series.
snoo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 9 (permalink) Old 10-04-2007, 01:03 PM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,507
                     
Re: 1000,500,250... how much for the slams?

2000

It's for 2009.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
post #3 of 9 (permalink) Old 10-04-2007, 06:59 PM
Registered User
 
Purple Rainbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: BoL
Age: 35
Posts: 6,782
                     
Re: 1000,500,250... how much for the slams?

How many points for challengers and futures is a more interesting question.

17 (yes, yes, yes!) Slams! And counting....
Purple Rainbow is offline  
post #4 of 9 (permalink) Old 10-04-2007, 07:36 PM
Registered User
 
CyBorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,166
                     
Re: 1000,500,250... how much for the slams?

2000 points for winning a major could have actually made some sense... except that the numbers are just basically double the old ones, meaning that Mr. Disney spent a vast amount of time reading over his first grade math textbook in search of the perfect algebraic solution to the tennis scheduling problem. And, alas, he found it.

Repeat after me: 2 times 2 is four. 2 times 2 is four. 2 times 2 is four. 2 times 2 is four.
/barney voice.

And so on.

Seriously speaking, I would have been perfectly happy with the points system we have at this time with a few minor but necessary corrections. The fact that a player does not have to have much success in grand slam competition in order to be in the ATP top 10 is a bit of an issue, because by virtue of the current system one can posit that playing a number of events in the summer clay season for example can be as effective, points wise, as making it to the final of a major (one is a tremendous feat, the other - let's say, two semis and one final in Sopot - is not.

So why not just make the majors worth more? And I don't mean multiply by two and everything else as well. I mean just the majors. This is why I say that 2000 points for the winner of a major is not a bad thing. But make the number mean something. Let's give the majors more weight. If not 2000 points, it could have at least been 1500. When you win a major you should have more points to your ranking than a guy who had a decent run across a number of minor events.

The 2009 formula is a band aid solution and it's stupid, unnecessarily jampacked with numbers and redundant. It will make things more competitive but succeeding in the majors is still not paramount to building up one's ranking. A guy will still be able to get by on 4r-QF types of results and rank as good as number three in the world if he does well enough elsewhere. Let's reward the true superstars: let's reward guys who play well at the best events.
CyBorg is offline  
post #5 of 9 (permalink) Old 10-04-2007, 07:36 PM
Registered User
 
Peoples's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,294
                     
Re: 1000,500,250... how much for the slams?

Why not call the slams "2000" then? It may be necessary for the marketing you know.

fernandogonzález
Peoples is offline  
post #6 of 9 (permalink) Old 10-04-2007, 07:41 PM
Registered User
 
CyBorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,166
                     
Re: 1000,500,250... how much for the slams?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peoples View Post
Why not call the slams "2000" then? It may be necessary for the marketing you know.
Pete Sampras holds the all-time record with 14 2000s. Many people also forget that he amassed a grand total of 5(!) WTFs.

That's right. 5 WTFs. It's incredible.

However the one minor blemish on his resume is that Sampras collected only 11 De Villiers ballsacks (formerly known as the masters series), a number long time ago surpassed by Federer.
CyBorg is offline  
post #7 of 9 (permalink) Old 10-04-2007, 07:44 PM
Registered User
 
Labamba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland
Age: 34
Posts: 32,551
                     
Re: 1000,500,250... how much for the slams?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peoples View Post
Why not call the slams "2000" then? It may be necessary for the marketing you know.
If only mr Disney could control the Slams damn ITF
Labamba is offline  
post #8 of 9 (permalink) Old 10-04-2007, 07:45 PM
Registered User
 
Purple Rainbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: BoL
Age: 35
Posts: 6,782
                     
Re: 1000,500,250... how much for the slams?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CyBorg View Post
Pete Sampras holds the all-time record with 14 2000s. Many people also forget that he amassed a grand total of 5(!) WTFs.

That's right. 5 WTFs. It's incredible.

However the one minor blemish on his resume is that Sampras collected only 11 De Villiers ballsacks (formerly known as the masters series), a number long time ago surpassed by Federer.
14 2000's? That's, like, 28,000! I love this new system!
Remember though that Agassi is the 1000 king!

17 (yes, yes, yes!) Slams! And counting....
Purple Rainbow is offline  
post #9 of 9 (permalink) Old 10-04-2007, 07:59 PM
Registered User
 
CyBorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,166
                     
Re: 1000,500,250... how much for the slams?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Purple Rainbow View Post
14 2000's? That's, like, 28,000! I love this new system!
Remember though that Agassi is the 1000 king!
Yup. Federer has 24,000. Meaning that he's 4,000 away from tying Sampras.
CyBorg is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome