I don't think either player was severely injured and took advantage of the rules yet again.
I didn't catch the match, myself, so I don't have any comment as to whether or not they were seriously injured. I would have to think that they weren't, based on everything I have read from people who did see the match... I'd like to come to my own conclusions based on having seen it, but ESPN wouldn't allow for such a match to be shown
Personally I am against the players having a massage for "cramps" when they are not fit enough to go the distance.
Well, I accept it because it's allowed. But if they all of a sudden altered the rules, and they weren't ridiculous, I don't think that I'd lose too much sleep over the matter.
These timeouts were between games though werent they? (i.e not on break points)
I believe so, yes. So not quite as sketchy as the Robredo timeout, but notable none the less.
That and anything done to contribute to a case of the Gaudio chokes is EEEEEEVVVVVIIIIILLLLL
Hee. That's a lot of variables to be calling evil