But he only got those results thanks to his seeding, which is a result of his vulturing. Haven't you been reading the posts of Lender's and his minions?
I have. But that argument is as retarded as it sounds.
If it was in fact so that Ferrer did not deserve his ranking, then chances are that someone WOULD beat him before the QF in most of the slams. But that doesn't happen. In fact Ferrer seldom loses to anyone outside the top 10. Hence, a person with a brain would draw the conclusion that Pics truly is top 10 material at the very LEAST.
It's true, David doesn't have a peak level as high as Tsonga, Soderling, Berdych or Del Potro. But he has an incredible consistency and always delivers when he is supposed to. You have to be either a moron or an attention whore to hate Ferrer for that. I suspect Lenders and Tyson are both.