The last player serving in the tiebreak receives in the next set. It doesn't matter who starts serving in the tiebreak , tiebreak is neutral in the sense of serve which is why we have 1-2-2-1 format
I thought the same until yesterday,but Kiefer was the last to serve in the tiebreak and served first in the next set.
I was confused
,but Farenhajt explained it later...-> Kiefer served first because Novak opened tiebreak with the serve.
I thought it was important who served last in the tiebreak,but it turned out to be other way round...
I think I saw the question on eurosport site,in their tennis quiz,and the right answer on the question: if a player is on serve in the last point of the tiebreak,who's serving first in the next set...? (or sth.like that) that player,opponent