I know (and agree to a certain extent) that its stupid to compare players that are not playing at the same time.
Anyway, I think it would have been an interesting matchup to see Nadal take on agassis style where he hits it early, hard and flat. we know that Nadal has problems with that style on other surfaces and that Andre have killed a couple of claycourt specialists during his prime.
What jerk you are.
Just look at their head-to-head. Nadal even kicked ass on grass with Agassi not having a single break point. How do you think he would manage to beat Nadal on clay? He even got beaten easily in 2005 on hard and declared after the match that he didn´t stand a chance against Nadal. Why don´t you think a bit before you open a thread and saying Agassi was so much better in his prime than in 2005 is bullshit also.
Nadal is the one who has improved since 2005.