Clearly you have no idea.
You have to beat your opponent if they are 5'1" or 6"10. Rochus is a mug if he is 5'1" or 6'10". You cant say hes a good player because he's short.
Its like saying Nate Robinson is a better dunker than say Rudy Fernendez because he's short. Thats simply not true.
Or that Jason Blake is better than Sidney Crosby because he's short.
Or that Dustin Pedroia is a better player than Manny because he's short.
And if watched Frank play Mardy Fish, I'd love to hear your opinion, but in mine, he isn't close to the player he was in 2007.
Are you being argumentative and obtuse on purpose? Or are you really this thick?
You completely missed my point. I am not suggesting that *because* he is short he's better than anyone. It is not a coincidence that there is no one else in the top 100 who is 5'2 or anywhere near that height. Most athletes that short, no matter what sport, couldn't even become a nationally ranked junior let alone go on to win ATP events. ALL I AM SAYING is that, considering his physical limitations, his achievements are impressive. As someone who is a fan of the game of tennis rather than just a results-whore, this is something I can appreciate. But I think this point is beyond your comprehension so let's just move on.