- View Single Post - 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?
View Single Post
post #70 of (permalink) Old 01-16-2013, 07:17 PM
country flag Nole fan
Registered User
Nole fan's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,624
Re: 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?

Originally Posted by Sophocles View Post
If the Big 4 means those 4 players who are currently way above all other players, you just have to ask whether the gap between 4 & 5 is much bigger than the gap between 3 & 4. In my opinion, it is. There are 4 players genuinely competing regularly for slam titles. Nobody else is. There were grounds for hesitation about Murray before he won the U.S. Open since it seemed he might be a hopeless choker in slam finals and therefore not a real competitor for a title despite consistently making the last 4, but his U.S. Open title has put paid to that.
Sensible post as usual. Gamewise we all know Murray is up there. He can regularly beat the other Top 3 and he's miles ahead of those ones below him. His achievements pale in comparison to Fedole, but he has time.

Novak Djokovic nº1!

The Golden Era of Novak: Australian Open * Dubai * Indian Wells * Miami * Belgrade * Madrid * Rome * Wimbledon * Montreal * US Open * Abu Dhabi * Australian Open * Miami * Toronto * China * Shanghai * World Tour Finals 2012 * Australian Open 2013 * Dubai * Montecarlo * Beijing * Shanghai * Paris * WTF * Indian Wells * Miami * Rome * WIMBLEDON 2014 * AUSSIE OPEN 2015
Federer to Nole: "Amazing year. Amazing tournament. Amazing match. You are THE BEST!"
Nole fan is offline  
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome